Drawing on a qualitative analysis of two recent labor disputes in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, this article asks: Why has a broad-based labor movement failed to emerge in contemporary China? Both pro-labor legislation and the existence of movement-oriented labor NGOs appear to provide opportunities and resources for workers to engage in organized action to expand workers’ rights. Two political mechanisms, however, help explain why a strong labor movement has not developed: 1) legislation and courtroom procedures and 2) official institutions that monopolize the space for representation—specifically the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU). We call these two mechanisms “political fixes” and discuss how they interact to engender a feedback between the fragmentation of collective action during labor conflict and the continuous uptick in labor insurgency. This article contributes to labor movement theory: It puts greater emphasis on the institutional mechanisms that constrain labor, as opposed to sheer repression or economic factors.
AlimiEitan. 2009. Mobilizing under the gun: Theorizing opportunity structure in a highly repressive setting. Mobilization14(2): 219–37.
2.
AlmeidaPaul. 2003. Opportunity organizations and threat-induced contention: Protest waves in authoritarian settings. American Journal of Sociology109(2): 345–400.
3.
AndersenEllen Ann. 2006. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
BellinEva. 2012. A modest transformation: Political change in the Arab world after the “Arab Spring.” In HenryClementJi-HyangJang (Eds.), The Arab Spring: Will It Lead to Democratic Transitions? pp. 33–48. Asan-Palgrave Macmillan Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
CaiYongshun. 2010. Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
CaijingWang. 2014. IBM 深圳罢工调查：变相阻扰员工维权 高层伪装普通员工参与谈判 [Shenzhen strike investigation: Labor rights activism hampered as high-level managers disguised as regular workers engage in negotiations], March3. Accessed at http://tech.caijing.com.cn/2014-03-10/113994813.html. Online news source.
9.
CarawayTeriCookMariaCrowleyStephen. 2015. Working through the Past: Labor and Authoritarian Legacies in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
ChanAnita. 1993. Revolution or corporatism? Workers and trade unions in post-Mao China. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs29: 31–61.
11.
ChanChris King-chi. 2010. The Challenge of Labour in China: Strikes and the Changing Labour Regime in Global Factories. China Policy Series 16. London: Routledge.
12.
ChanChris King-chi. 2013. Contesting class organization: Migrant workers’ strikes in China’s Pearl River Delta, 1978–2010. International Labor and Working-Class History83: 112–36.
13.
ChanJennyNgaiPunSeldenMark. 2013. The politics of global production: Apple, Foxconn, and China’s new working class. New Technology Work and Employment28(2): 100–115.
14.
ChenFengXuXin. 2012. “Active judiciary”: Judicial dismantling of workers’ collective action in China. China Journal, no. 67: 87–108.
15.
ChengJoseph YSNgokKinglunZhuangWenjia. 2010. The survival and development space for China’s labor NGOs: Informal politics and its uncertainty. Asia Survey50(6): 1082–1106.
ChuaLynette. 2012. Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law and Society Review46(4): 713–48.
18.
ClemensElisabeth S.MinkoffDebra C.KriesiHanspeter. 2004. Beyond the iron law: Rethinking the place of organizations in social movement research. In SnowDavid A.SouleSarah A. (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, pp. 155–70. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19.
CressDanielSnowDavid. 1996. Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. American Journal of Sociology61: 1089–1109.
20.
de la Luz InclanMaria. 2008. From the !Ya Basta! to the Caracoles: Zapatista mobilization under transitional conditions. American Journal of Sociology113(5): 1316–50.
21.
della PortaDonatellaRuchtDieter. 1995. Left-Libertarian movements in context: A comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990. In JenkinsJ. CraigKlandermansBert (Eds.), The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, pp. 220–72. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DobbinFrank. 2009. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
EarlJennifer. 2011. Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review of Sociology37: 261–84.
25.
EdelmanLauren B.SuchmanMark C.1997. The legal environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology23: 479–515.
26.
EinwohnerRachel. 2003. Opportunity, honor, and action in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943. American Journal of Sociology109(3): 650–75.
27.
ElfstromManfredKuruvillaSarosh. 2014. The changing nature of labor unrest in China. ILR Review67(2): 453–80.
28.
EppCharles R.1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
EskridgeWilliam. 2001. Channeling: Identity-based social movements and public law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review150: 419–525.
30.
EwickPatriciaSilbeySusan S.1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
FriedmanEli. 2012. Getting through the hard times together? Chinese workers and unions respond to the economic crisis. Journal of Industrial Relations54(4): 459–75.
32.
FriedmanEli. 2014a. Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Postsocialist China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
33.
FriedmanEli. 2014b. Alienated politics: Labour insurgency and the paternalistic state in China. Development and Change45(5): 1001–18.
34.
FriedmanEliLeeChing Kwan. 2010. Remaking the world of Chinese labour: A 30-year retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(3): 507–33.
35.
GallagherMary E.2004. “Time is money, efficiency is life”: The transformation of labor relations in China. Studies in Comparative International Development39(2): 11–44.
36.
GallagherMary E.2006. Mobilizing the law in China: “Informed disenchantment” and the development of legal consciousness. Law & Society Review40(4): 783–816.
37.
GallagherMary E.2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
GinsburgTomMoustafaTamir (Eds.). 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
GransowBettinaZhuJiangang. 2014. Labour rights and beyond—How migrant worker NGOs negotiate urban spaces in the Pearl River Delta. Population, Space and Place. Accessed at wileyonlinelibrary.com: doi:10.1002/psp.1894.
40.
HarperDouglas. 1992. Small N’s and community case studies. In RaginCharlesBeckerHoward (Eds.), What Is a Case?, pp. 139–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HaleguaAaron. 2016. Who Will Represent China’s Workers? Lawyers, Legal Aid, and the Enforcement of Labor Rights. US–Asia Law Institute, New York University School of Law. Accessed at https://usali.org/chinasworkers.
42.
HeAlex JingweiHuangGenghua. 2014. Fighting for migrant labor rights in the world’s factory: Legitimacy, resource constraints and strategies of grassroots migrant labor NGOs in South China. Journal of Contemporary China24(93): 471–92.
JenkinsJ. Craig. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology9(1): 527–53.
45.
JenkinsJ. CraigPerrowCharles. 1977. Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review42(2): 249–68.
46.
KingGaryPanJenniferRobertsMargaret. 2013. How censorship in China allows government criticisms but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review107(2): 1–18.
47.
KriesiHanspeter. 1996. The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. In McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N. (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 152–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
KurzmanCharles.1996. Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: The Iranian Revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review61(1): 153–70.
49.
LeeChing Kwan. 2002. From the specter of Mao to the spirit of the law: Labor insurgency in China. Theory and Society31(2): 189–228.
50.
LeeChing Kwan. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
LiPeilinChenGuangjinZhangYi. 2015. Analysis and Forecast of Chinese Society (2015). Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Publishing House.
52.
LichbachMark I.1987. Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution31(2): 277–97.
53.
MarwellGeraldOliverPamela E.PrahlRalph. 1988. Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. American Journal of Sociology94(3): 502–34.
54.
McAdamDoug. 1983. Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review48(6): 735–54.
55.
McAdamDoug. 1996. Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N. (Eds.). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 23–40. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
McCannMichael W.1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
McCannMichael W.SilversteinHelena. 2001. Rethinking law’s allurements: A relations analysis of social movement lawyers in the United States. In SaratAustinScheingoldStuart A. (Eds.), Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era, pp. 261–92. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
McCannMichael W.SilversteinHelena. 2006. Law and social movements. Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 17–38.
59.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology82(6): 1212–41.
60.
MeyerMegan. 2004. Organizational identity, political contexts, and SMO action: Explaining the tactical choices made by peace organizations in Israel, Northern Ireland, and South Africa. Social Movement Studies3(2): 167–97.
NgaiPunChanJenny. 2012. Global capital, the state, and Chinese workers: The Foxconn experience. Modern China38(4): 383–410.
63.
O’BrienKevin J. (Ed.). 2009. Popular Protest in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
O’BrienKevin J.LiLianjiang. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
PanitchLeo. 1980. Recent theorizations of corporatism: Reflections on a growth industry. British Journal of Sociology31(2): 159.
66.
PedrianaNicholas. 2004. Help wanted NOW: Legal resources, the women’s movement and the battle over sex-segregated job advertisements. Social Problems51: 182–201.
67.
PedrianaNicholas. 2006. From protective to equal treatment: Legal framing processes ad transformation of the women’s movement in the 1960’s. American Journal of Sociology111: 1718–61.
68.
PedrianaNicholasStrykerRobin. 2004. The strength of a weak agency: Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and expansion of state capacity, 1965–1971. American Journal of Sociology110: 709–60.
69.
PeerenboomRandall. 2002. China’s Long March toward Rule of Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
PringleTim. 2013. Reflections on labor in China: From a moment to a movement. South Atlantic Quarterly112(1): 191–202.
71.
ScheingoldStuart A.2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. 2nd edition.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
72.
SilbeySusan. 1998. Ideology, power, and justice. In GarthBryant G.SaratAustin (Eds.), Justice and Power in Sociolegal Studies, pp. 272–308. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
73.
SilverBeverly J.2003. Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SnowDavid A.Rochford Jr.E. BurkeJr.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review51(4): 464–81.
75.
SnowDavid A.CressDaniel M.DowneyLiamJonesAndrew. 1998. Disrupting the quotidian: Reconceptualizing the relationship between breakdown and the emergence of collective action. Mobilization3(1): 1–22.
76.
StrykerRobin. 2007. Half empty, half full, or neither: Law, inequality, and social change in capitalist democracies. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences3: 69–97.
77.
TarrowSidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
ThompsonEdward P.1966. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books.
79.
TillyCharles. 2006. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80.
TocquevilleAlexis de. 2002 [1889]. Democracy in America. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
81.
VanhalaLisa. 2012. Legal opportunity structures and the paradox of legal mobilization by the environmental movement in the UK. Law and Society Review46(3): 523–56.
82.
WangDan J.SouleSarah A.2012. Social movement organizational collaboration: Networks of learning and the diffusion of protest tactics, 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology117(6): 1674–1722.
83.
WangHaiyanAppelbaumRichard P.DegiuliFrancescaLichtensteinNelson. 2009. China’s new labour contract law: Is China moving towards increased power for workers?Third World Quarterly30(3): 485–501.
84.
WangTianyuCookeFang Lee. 2017. Striking the balance in industrial relations in China? An analysis of court decisions of 897 strike cases (2008–2015). Journal of Industrial Relations59(1): 22–43.
85.
YanXiaojun. 2011. Regime inclusion and the resilience of authoritarianism: The local people’s political consultative conference in post-Mao Chinese politics. China Journal66: 53–75.
86.
YuanJianzhang. 2013. 做了20年护工怎么就和医院没关系 [I’ve Been a Nursing Assistant for Twenty Years, How Could I Not Have Relations with the Hospital]. 信息时报 [Information Times], April13. Accessed at http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2013-04-13/071926813858.shtml.
87.
ZaldMayerMcCarthyJohn D.2002. The resource mobilization research program: Progress, challenge, and transformation. In BergerJosephZelditchMorris (Eds.), New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, pp. 147–71. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
88.
ZhaoYun. 2009. China’s new Labor Dispute Resolution Law: A catalyst for the establishment of a harmonious labor relationship?Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal30(2): 409–30.
