This article estimates the causal effect of the prospect of legal status on the employment outcomes of undocumented immigrants. The identification strategy exploits a natural experiment provided by an Italian amnesty program that introduced an exogenous discontinuity in eligibility based on date of arrival. The authors find that immigrants who are potentially eligible for legal status under the amnesty program have a significantly higher probability of being employed relative to undocumented immigrants who are not eligible. The size of the estimated effect is equivalent to about half the increase in employment that undocumented immigrants in our sample normally experience during their first year in Italy. These findings are robust to several checks and falsification exercises.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaBansakCynthia. 2011. The impact of amnesty on labor market outcomes: A panel study using the legalized population survey. Industrial Relations50(3): 443–71.
2.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaMazzolariFrancesca. 2010. Remittances to Latin America from migrants in the United States: Assessing the impact of amnesty programs. Journal of Development Economics91(2): 323–35.
3.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaBansakCynthiaRaphaelSteven. 2007. Gender differences in the labor market: Impact of IRCA. American Economic Review97(2): 412–16.
4.
BarcellosSilvia H.2010. Legalization and the economic status of immigrants. RAND Corporation Working Paper 754. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. URL: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR754.html.
5.
BertakisKlea D.AzariRahmanHelmsL. JaysCallahanEdward J.RobbinsJohn A. 2000. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. Journal of Family Practice49(2): 147–52.
6.
BohnSarahLofstromMagnusRaphaelSteven. 2014. Did the 2007 Legal Arizona Workers Act reduce the state’s unauthorized immigrant population?Review of Economics and Statistics96(2): 258–69.
7.
BorjasGeorge J.2016. The labor supply of undocumented immigrants. NBER Working Paper No. 22102. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BorjasGeorge J.TiendaMarta. 1993. The employment and wages of legalized immigrants. International Migration Review27(4): 712–47.
9.
BratsbergBerntRagan Jr.James F.Jr.NasirZafar M.2002. The effect of naturalization on wage growth: A panel study of young male immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics20(3): 568–97.
10.
BrickKate. 2011Regularizations in the European Union: The contentious policy tool. Migration Policy Institute Insight (2011): 1–21.
11.
CasaricoAlessandraFacchiniGiovanniFrattiniTommaso. 2012. Spending more is spending less: Policy dilemmas on irregular migration. Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano Development Studies Working Paper 330. Milan, Italy.
12.
ChassamboulliAndriPeriGiovanni. 2015. The labor market effects of reducing undocumented immigrants. Review of Economic Dynamics8(4): 792–821.
13.
ChauNancy H.2001. Strategic amnesty and credible immigration reform. Journal of Labor Economics19(3): 604–34.
14.
ChauvinSébastienGarcés-MascareñasBlancaKralerAlbert. 2013. Working for legality: Employment and migrant regularization in Europe. International Migration51(6): 118–31.
15.
Cobb-ClarkDeborah A.ShiellsClinton R.LowellB. Lindsay. 1995. Immigration reform: The effects of employer sanctions and legalization on wages. Journal of Labor Economics13(3): 472–98.
16.
DevillanovaCarlo. 2008. Social networks, information and health care utilization: Evidence from undocumented immigrants in Milan. Journal of Health Economics27: 265–86.
17.
DustmannChristianFasaniFrancescoSpecialeBiagio. 2017. Illegal migration and consumption behavior of immigrant households. Journal of the European Economic Association15(3): 654–91.
18.
EthierWilfred J.1986. Illegal immigration: The host-country problem. American Economic Review76(1): 56–71.
19.
FacchiniGiovanniTestaCecilia. 2011. The rhetoric of closed borders: Quotas, lax enforcement and illegal migration. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 8245. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
20.
FasaniFrancesco. 2010. The quest for La Dolce Vita? Undocumented migration in Italy. In TriandafyllidouAnna (Ed.), Irregular Migration in Europe: Myths and Realities, Chapter 9. Farnham: Ashgate.
21.
FasaniFrancesco. 2015. Understanding the role of immigrants’ legal status: Evidence from policy experiments. CESifo Economic Studies61(3–4): 722–63.
22.
Gonzalez-BakerSusan. 1990. The Cautious Welcome: The Legalization Programs of the Immigration Reform and Control Act. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
HansonGordon H.2006. Illegal migration from Mexico to the United States. Journal of Economic Literature44(4): 869–924.
24.
HansonGordon H.SpilimbergoAntonio. 1999. Illegal immigration, border enforcement, and relative wages: Evidence from apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border. American Economic Review89(5): 1337–57.
25.
Istat. 2008. Capitolo 5. L’immigrazione tra Nuovi Flussi e Stabilizzazioni. Rapporto annuale - La situazione del Paese nel 2007. Rome: Italian National Institute for Statistics (Istat).
26.
KaushalNeeraj. 2006. Amnesty programs and the labor market outcomes of undocumented workers. Journal of Human Resources41(3): 631–47.
27.
KossoudjiSherrie A.Cobb-ClarkDeborah A.2000. IRCA’s impact on the occupational concentration and mobility of newly-legalized Mexican men. Journal of Population Economics13(1): 81–98.
28.
KossoudjiSherrie A.Cobb-ClarkDeborah A.2002. Coming out of the shadows: Learning about legal status and wages from the legalized population. Journal of Labor Economics20(3): 598–628.
29.
KralerAlbert. 2009. Regularisation: A misguided option or part and parcel of a comprehensive policy response to irregular migration. IMISCOE Working Paper No. 24. Rotterdam: International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion.
30.
LeeDavid S.2008. Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 675–97.
31.
LeeDavid S.LemieuxThomas. 2010. Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature48(2): 281–355.
32.
LozanoFernando A.SorensenTodd A.2011. The labor market value to legal status. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5492. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
33.
MastrobuoniGiovanniPinottiPaolo. 2015. Legal status and the criminal activity of immigrants. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics7(2): 175–206.
34.
MazzolariFrancesca. 2009. Dual citizenship rights: Do they make more and better citizens?Demography46(1): 169–91.
35.
McCraryJustin. 2008. Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 698–714.
36.
McKenzieDavid J.MistiaenJohan. 2009. Surveying migrant households: A comparison of census-based, snowball and intercept point surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A172(2): 339–60.
37.
OrreniusPiaZavodnyMadeline. 2003. Do amnesty programs reduce undocumented immigration? Evidence from IRCA. Demography40(3): 437–50.
38.
OrreniusPiaZavodnyMadelineKerrEmily. 2012. Chinese immigrants in the US labor market: Effects of post-Tiananmen immigration policy. International Migration Review46(2): 456–82.
39.
PanYing. 2012. The impact of legal status on immigrants’ earnings and human capital: Evidence from the IRCA 1986. Journal of Labor Research33(2): 119–42.
40.
Redondo-SendinoÁureaGuallar-CastillónPilarBanegasJosé RamónRodríguez-ArtalejoFernando. 2006. Gender differences in the utilization of health-care services among the older adult population of Spain. BMC Public Health6: 155.
41.
Rivera-BatizFrancisco L.1999. Undocumented workers in the labor market: An analysis of the earnings of legal and illegal Mexican immigrants in the United States. Journal of Population Economics12(1): 91–116.
VogelDitaKovachevaVeselaPrescottHannah. 2011. The size of the irregular migrant population in the European Union: Counting the uncountable?International Migration49(5): 78–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
