In contrast to traditional economic methods to address negative externalities, the study of pro-social nudges within the field of behavioral economics is quickly developing (Carlsson et al., 2019, 2021; Schubert, 2017). The aim of pro-social nudges is to reduce a negative externality to a defined group or community. This study uses a natural field experiment to examine the impact of a pro-social nudge on a local negative externality of hot rooms in college residence buildings and the resulting more global externality of excess greenhouse gas emissions. These externalities are the result of the interplay between the heating system and the propensity of students to open their windows causing the system to produce more heat to everyone––labeled the snowballing problem. This study suggests the nudge did not reduce the negative externalities, rather it may have backfired and exacerbated the existing problem (room temperatures increased 0.5–1.6 F° after the intervention). As the results illustrate, addressing negative externalities with pro-social nudges may be particularly challenging because they often target behavior that benefits a larger society and requires the individual to experience some short-term disutility.
AllcottH.RogersT. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. The American Economic Review, 104(10), 3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003
4.
AndorM. A.GersterA.PetersJ.SchmidtC. M. (2020). Social norms and energy conservation beyond the US. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 103, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102351
5.
BambergS.HuneckeM.BlöbaumA. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
6.
BaoJ.HoB. (2015). Heterogeneous effects of informational nudges on pro-social behavior. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15(4), 1619–1655. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0125
7.
BicchieriC.DimantE. (2019). Nudging with care: The risks and benefits of social information. Public Choice, 191(3-4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00684-6
8.
BicchieriC.DimantE.XiaoE. (2021). Deviant or wrong? The effects of norm information on the efficacy of punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 188, 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.002
9.
BonanJ.CattaneoC.d’AddaG.TavoniM. (2020). The interaction of descriptive and injunctive social norms in promoting energy conservation. Nature Energy, 5(11), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00719-z
10.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
11.
BrunsH.Kantorowicz-ReznichenkoE.KlementK.Luistro JonssonM.RahaliB. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective?Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.02.002
CarlssonF.GravertC.Johansson-StenmanO.KurzV. (2021). The use of green nudges as an environmental policy instrument. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 15(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1086/715524
14.
CarlssonF.GravertC. A.KurzV.Johansson-StenmanO. (2019). Nudging as an environmental policy instrument. University of Gothenburg.
15.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
16.
CialdiniR. B.DemaineL. J.SagarinB. J.BarrettD. W.RhoadsK.WinterP. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510500181459
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
19.
CzajkowskiM.ZagórskaK.HanleyN. (2019). Social norm nudging and preferences for household recycling. Resource and Energy Economics, 58, 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.07.004
20.
FongG. T.HammondD.HitchmanS. C. (2009). The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(8), 640–643. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.09.069575
21.
GoldsteinN. J.CialdiniR. B.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
22.
HagmanW.AnderssonD.VästfjällD.TinghögG. (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2
23.
Haita-FalahC. (2017). Sunk-cost fallacy and cognitive ability in individual decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 58, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.001
24.
HallsworthM.ChadbornT.SallisA.SandersM.BerryD.GreavesF.ClementsL.DaviesS. C. (2016). Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: A pragmatic national randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England), 387(10029), 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00215-4
25.
HallsworthM.ListJ. A.MetcalfeR. D.VlaevI. (2017). The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
26.
HanksA. S.JustD. R.SmithL. E.WansinkB. (2012). Healthy convenience: Nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. Journal of Public Health, 34(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds003
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
30.
KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610009
31.
KantolaS. J.SymeG. J.CampbellN. A. (1984). Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.69.3.416
32.
LegrosS.CislaghiB. (2020). Mapping the social-norms literature: An overview of reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866455
33.
LewisD. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. John Wiley & Sons.
34.
MackieG.MonetiF.ShakyaH.DennyE. (2015). What are social norms? How are they measured. University of California at San Diego-UNICEF Working Paper.
35.
MillerC. H.BurgoonM.GrandpreJ. R.AlvaroE. M. (2006). Identifying principal risk factors for the initiation of adolescent smoking behaviors: The significance of psychological reactance. Health Communication, 19(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1903_6
36.
NayarA.KanakaS. (2017). A comparative study on water conservation through behavioral economics based nudging: Evidence from Indian city “a nudge in time can save nine”. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8(11), 73–78.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
42.
StibeA.CugelmanB. (2016). Persuasive backfiring: When behavior change interventions trigger unintended negative outcomes. In International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 65–77). Springer.
SzasziB.PalinkasA.PalfiB.SzollosiA.AczelB. (2018). A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: Toward understanding when and why nudges work. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2035
45.
ThalerR. H.BenartziS. (2004). Save more tomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164–S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/380085
46.
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
47.
TyersR. (2018). Nudging the jetset to offset: Voluntary carbon offsetting and the limits to nudging. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(10), 1668–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1494737
48.
VelezM. A.MorosL. (2021). Have behavioral sciences delivered on their promise to influence environmental policy and conservation practice?Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.06.008
49.
Wunderground Local Weather Forecast, News and Conditions. (2023). [dataset]. Wunderground Local Weather Forecast, News and Conditions. https://www.wunderground.com/
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
