This paper assesses the effect of the crowd size on home team advantage, using a natural experiment occurred in Brazilian football. In 2015, the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) quasi-randomly assigned games to be played under an alternative schedule on Sundays at 11 a.m. This measure significantly increased attendance in assigned games. Using this alternative schedule as an instrumental variable, we show that the exogenous increase in attendance did not increase home team advantage.
AbadieA.AtheyS.ImbensG. W.WooldridgeJ. (2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering?Working paper. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24003.pdf
2.
AgnewG.CarronA. (1994). Crowd effects and home advantage. International Journal of Sports and Psychology, 25, 53–62.
3.
AngristJ. D.ImbensG. W.RubinD. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–472.
4.
AudrinoF. (2018). Do match officials give preferential treatment to the strongest football teams? An analysis of four top European clubs. Journal of Quantitative Analysis of Sports, 14, 185–199.
5.
BoudreauxC.SandersS.WaliaB. (2015). A natural experiment to determine the crowd effect upon home court advantage. Journal of Sports Economics, 18, 737–749.
6.
BuraimoB. (2008). Stadium attendance and television audience demand in English league football. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6), 513–523.
7.
BuraimoB.SimmonsR. (2015). Uncertainty of outcome or star quality? Television audience demand for English premier league football. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 22(3), 449–469.
8.
CarronA.LougheadT.BrayS. (2005). The home advantage in sports competitions: Courneya and Carron’s (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 395–407.
9.
ClarkeS.NormanJ. (1995). Home ground advantage of individual clubs in English soccer. The Statistician, 44, 509–524.
10.
DawsonP.DobsonS. (2010). The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: Evidence from the behavior of referees. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 181–191.
11.
DobsonS.GoddardJ. (2011). The Economics of football. Cambridge University Press.
12.
DohmenT. (2008). The influence of social forces: Evidence from the behavior of football referees. Economic Inquiry, 46, 411–424.
13.
ForrestD.SimmonsR. (2006). New issues in attendance demand: The case of the English football league. Journal of Sports Economics, 7(3), 247–266.
14.
GaricanoL.Palacios-HuertaI.PrendergastC. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 208–216.
15.
GournasC. (2014). Home advantage in Australian soccer. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sports, 17, 119–123.
16.
KrumerA.LechnerM. (2018). Midweek effect on soccer performance: Evidence from German Bundesliga. Economic Inquiry, 41, 193–207.
17.
LougheadT.CarronA.BrayS.KimA. (2003). Facility familiarity and the home advantage in professional sports. International Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 1, 264–274.
18.
MadalozzoR.VillarR. (2009). Brazilian football: What brings fans to the game?Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 639–650.
19.
Montiel OleaJ. L.PfluegerC. (2013). A robust test for weak instruments. Journal of Business Economics & Statistics, 31, 358–369.
20.
MurrayM. P. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 111–132.
21.
NicholsM. (2014). The impact of visiting team travel on game outcome and biases in NFL betting markets. Journal of Sports Economics, 15, 78–86.
22.
OberhoferH.PhilippovicT.WinnerH. (2010). Distance matters in away games: Evidence from German football league. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 200–211.
23.
PageK.PageL. (2010). Alone against the crowd: Individual differences in referees’ ability to cope under pressure. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 192–199.
24.
PollardR. (2002). Evidence of a reduced form advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 969–973.
25.
PollardR. (2006). Worldwide regional variation in home advantage in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 231–240.
26.
PollardR.PollardG. (2005). Home advantage in soccer: A Review of its existence and causes. International Journal of Soccer and Science Journal, 3, 28–38.
27.
PonzoM.ScoppaV. (2016). Does the home advantage depend on crowd support? Evidence from same-stadium derbies. Journal of Sports Economics, 19, 562–582.
28.
ScoppaV. (2008). Are subjective evaluations biased by social factors or connections? An econometric analysis of soccer referee decisions. Empirical Economics, 35, 123–140.
29.
SmithE. E.GroetzingerJ. D. (2010). Do fans matter? The effect of attendance on the outcomes of major league baseball games. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(1), 4.
30.
SutterM.KocherM. G. (2004). Favoritism of agents—The case of referees’ home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 461–469.
31.
WangC.GoossensD.VandebroekM. (2016). The impact of the soccer schedule on TV viewership and stadium attendance evidence from the Belgian Pro League. Journal of Sports Economicshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1527002515612875
