Internet crimes against minors is a complex social emerging issue and a matter of concern that needs more attention from the government law enforcement agencies, legislators, parents, educators, intermediaries and over-the-top (OTT) platforms due to the massive increase in the usage of internet and mobile communication technologies. It is seen that relative ease in accessing media has led to an increase in online crimes against teenagers/adolescents having varied dimensions and impact on the victims. The study explores different forms of online crimes faced by teenagers through various online platforms, the potential offenders and the types of technologies deployed by them to commit crimes against minors. The article focuses on analysing existing laws and policies in India to combat cybercrimes against minors. Strategies for the prevention and protection of children against child abuse and exploitation have also been discussed.
ArmstrongH.L., & FordeP.J. (2003). Internet anonymity practices in computer crime. Information Management & Computer Security, 11, 209–215.
2.
BadaM., & JasonR.C. (2020). The social and psychological impact of cyberattacks. In BensonV. & McalaneyJ. (Eds.), Emerging cyber threats and cognitive vulnerabilities (pp. 73–92). Academic Press.
3.
BalfeM. (2014). Internet child sex offenders’ concerns about online security and their use of identity protection technologies: A review. Child Abuse Review, 24(6), 427–439.
4.
BrooksF., ChesterK., KlemeraE., & MagnussonJ. (2017). Cyberbullying: An analysis of data from the health behaviour in school-aged children. Retrieved, September26, 2020, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621070/Health_behaviour_in_school_age_children_cyberbullying.pdf
5.
ECAPT. (2020). Why children are at risk of sexual abuse and exploitation during COVID-19. Retrieved April4, 2022, from https://ecpat.org/story/why-children-are-at-risk-of-sexual-exploitation-during-covid-19/
6.
FascendiniF., & Fialová, K. (2011). Voices from digital spaces: Technology related violence against women. Association for Progressive Communications.
7.
FinkelhorD., MitchellK., & WolakJ. (2001). Highlights of the Youth Internet Safety Survey. OJJDP Factsheet. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved, October23, 2020, from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/fs200104.pdf
8.
HadzhidimovaL.I., & PayneB.K. (2019). The profile of the international cyber offender in the U.S. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime, 2(1), 40–55. https://www.doi.org/10.52306/0201041YNGG5534
9.
HahnC., & KimD.J. (2014). Is there a shared neurobiology between aggression and Internet addiction disorder?Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(1), 12–20. 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.1.2
10.
HennS. (2013). Teens dig digital privacy, if Snap Chat is any indication. Retrieved, January10, 2021, from http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2013/12/10/249731334/teens-dig-digital-privacy-if-snapchat-is-any-indication
11.
HoltT., KristieB., & BurkerN. (2010). Considering the pedophile subculture online. Sexual Abuse, 22, 3–24.
12.
Internet Safety Technical Task Force. (2008). Enhancing child safety and online technologies: Final report of the internet safety technical task force to the multi-state working group on social networking of state attorneys general of the United States. Berkman. Retrieved, February2, 2021, from https://cyber.harvard.edu/pubrelease/isttf/.
13.
Internet Watch Foundation. (2019). Once upon a year - IWF Annual Report 2018. Retrieved, February15, 2021, from https://www.iwf.org.uk/
14.
JohnsonJ. (2021a, January). Number of online users worldwide 2020, by country. Retrieved, March13, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/271411/number-of-internet-users-in-selected-countries/
15.
JohnsonJ. (2021b, March). Worldwide digital population as of January 2021. Retrieved, March13, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
16.
KierkergaardS. (2011). To block or not to block: European Child Porno Law in question. Computer Law and Security Review, 27, 573–584.
17.
KrishnamurthyS., & ChetlapalliS.K. (2015). Internet addiction: Prevalence and risk factors: A cross-sectional study among college students in Bengaluru, the Silicon Valley of India. Indian Journal of Public Health, 59(2), 115–121.
18.
KussD.J., GriffithsM.D., & BinderJ.F. (2013). Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 959–966.
19.
MaheshwariR. (2020). In one year alone, cyberbullying of Indian women and teenagers rose by 36%. Scroll.in. Retrieved, February16, 2021, from https://scroll.in/article/956085/
20.
MenonS., NarayananL., & KahwajiA.T. (2018). Internet addiction: A research study of college students in India. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(1), 100–106.
21.
MitchellK.J., & JonesL.M. (2013). Internet-facilitated commercial sexual exploitation of children. https://scholars.unh.edu/ccrc/38/
22.
MitchellK., FinkelhorD., JonesL., & WolakJ. (2010). Use of social networking sites in online sex crimes against minors: An examination of national incidence and means of utilization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 183–190.
23.
MitchellK., JonesL., FinkelhorD., & WolakJ. (2011). Internet-facilitated commercial sexual exploitation of children: Findings from a nationally representative sample of law enforcement agencies in the United States. Sexual Abuse, 2, 43–71.
24.
PatchinJ.W. (2019, May29). School bullying rates increase by 35% from 2016 to 2019 [Blog]. Cyber bullying research centre. Retrieved, December26, 2020, from https://cyberbullying.org/school-bullying-rates-increase-by-35-from-2016-to-2019
25.
SakthivelA., & KhaliqueN., AnsariM.A., & FaiziN. (2017). Prevalence & determinants of internet addiction among Indian adolescents. Indian Journal of Community Health, 29(1), 89–95.
26.
StewartJ.N. (2014). Advanced technologies/tactics techniques, procedures: Closing the attack window, and thresholds for reporting and containment. In HathawayM.E. (Ed.), Best practices in computer network defense: Incident detection and response (pp. 30–42). IOS Press.
27.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). The national strategy for child exploitation prevention and interdiction. A report to Congress.
28.
UNICEF. (2011). Child safety online. Global challenges and strategies. Retrieved, September19, 2020, from https://www.unicef.org
29.
UNODC. (2015). Study on the effects of new information technologies on the abuse and exploitation of children. United Nations. Retrieved, September19, 2020, from https://www.unodc.org/documents/organizecrime/cybercrime/Study_on_the_Effects.pdf
30.
VeerasamyS. (2015). Information technology services issues and challenges with a case study in small medium enterprises. International Journal of System and Software Engineering, 3(2). 10.21863/ijsse/2015.3.2.011
31.
WolakJ., FinkelhorD., & MitchellM. (2011). Child pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Sexual Abuse, 23, 22–42.
32.
WolakJ., LiberatoreM., & LevineB.N. (2014). Measuring a year of child pornography trafficking by U.S. computers on a peer-to-peer network. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(2), 347–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.018
