Does Economic Growth Pay Political Dividends in India?

Abstract

Since independence in 1947, India has witnessed several changes in economic policies of governments. Economic reforms were started in India in 1984 and were accelerated later in 1991. It is believed that Bharatiya Janata Party won the 2014 parliamentary elections on the promise of economic development and growth. In this article, an attempt has been made to investigate the link between economic and electoral performances in Indian elections. The data for 1951–2014 period has been analysed by establishing regression equations using vote percentage received by a ruling party as dependent variable and sectoral economic growth during the ruling tenure as independent variables. Comparisons have been made between the pre- and post-1984 eras. An important contribution of this article is that it highlights the fact that electoral performances can be better explained using sectoral growth data as compared to overall GDP growth rates. The article also highlights a significant role played by volatility in growth rates.

Keywords

Sectoral economic growth political dividend electoral performance Indian elections

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Johnson

Robinson

J. A.

Thaicharoen

(2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomics symptoms: volatility, crises, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics , 50(1), 49–122.

Ahluwalia

M. S.

(1995). Economic reform for the 1990s (First Raj Krishna Memorial Lecture). Department of Economics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 1. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4ae6/934477b171f8ac835c1cea10efcff93c25e4.pdf

Alesina

Rosenthal

(1989). Moderating elections (NBER Working Paper No. 3072). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Alesina

Rosenthal

(1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy . Cambridge University Press.

Brender

Drazen

(2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. American Economic Review , 98(5), 2203–2220.

Dallal

G. E.

(2012). The little handbook of statistical practice . http://www.jerrydallal.com/lhsp/simplify.htm

DeLong

J. B.

(2001). India since independence: An analytic growth narrative. In Rodrik

(Ed.), Modern economic growth: Analytical country studies . Princeton University Press.

Fair

R. C.

(1978). The effect of economic events on votes for presidents. The Review of Economic and Statistics, LX (2),159–173.

Field

A. P.

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll . SAGE Publications.

10.

Gupta

Pangariya

(2011, 31 March–1 April). India: Election outcomes and economic performance . Paper presented at Columbia–NCAER Conference on Trade, Poverty, Inequality and Democracy, New Delhi.

11.

Levin

R. I.

Rubin

D. S.

(1997). Statistics for management . Prentice Hall.

12.

Lewis-Beck

M. S.

(1988). Economics and elections: The major western democracies . University of Michigan Press.

13.

Loayza

N. V.

Rancie‘re

Serve´n

Ventura

(2007). Macroeconomic volatility and welfare in developing countries: An introduction. The World Bank Economic Review , 21(3), 343–357.

14.

Mobarak

A. M.

(2005). Democracy, volatility & economic development. Review of Economics & Statistics , 87(2), 348–361.

15.

Mukherji

(2011). The political economy of development in India. In Ganguly

& Mukherji

(Eds.), India since 1980 . Cambridge University Press.

16.

Nayar

B. R.

(2006 May 13). When did the ‘Hindu’ rate of growth end? Economic and Political Weekly , 41(19), 1885–1890.

17.

Pangariya

(2004). India in the 1980s and 1990s: A triumph of reforms (IMF Working Paper No. WP/04/43). International Monetary Fund.

18.

Powell

G. B.

Whitten

G. D.

(1993). A Cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37(2), 391–414.

19.

Rodrik

(2000). Institutions for high quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them . (NBER Working Paper No. 7540). National Bureau of Economic Research.