Individuals with physical disabilities are often stigmatized because their bodies are assumed to vary from norms of physical competence and bodily appearance. Possession of a discrediting attribute may impair social interactions and result in the devaluation of an individual. The purpose of this paper is to explore how involvement in sport and physical activity may be one strategy to manage the stigma of a disabled body. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 24 male college students with physical disabilities. Findings indicate that respondents believe this context helps them exceed expectations associated with their disability through demonstration of physical skill, a fit healthy body, a muscular body, and a liberated body. Sport and physical activity may be effective in compensating for a spoiled identity as participation in this setting is unexpected and emphasizes an alternative representation of a disabled body.
ASCH, A.The experience of disability: A challenge for psychology. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 529-536.
2.
ASKEN, M. J.The challenge of the physically challenged: Delivering sport psychology services to physically disabled athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 1991, 5, 370-381.
3.
BOGDAN, R. C., & BIKLEN, S. K.Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
4.
CASH, T. F.The psychology of physical appearance: Aesthetics, attributes, and images. In T. F. Cash and T Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990, pp. 51-79.
5.
COAKLEY, J. J.Sport in society: Issues and controversies (5th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby, 1994.
6.
EITZEN, D. S., & SAGE, G. H.Sociology of North American sport (5th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark, 1993.
7.
ELLIOTT, G. C., ZIEGLER, H. L., ALTMAN, B. M., & SCOYTV D. R.Understanding stigma: Dimensions of deviance and coping. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Deviant behaviorNew York: Hemisphere, 1990, pp. 423-443.
8.
FINE, M., & ASCH, A.Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44, 3-21.
9.
GERSCHICK, T. J., & MILLER, A. S.Gender identities at the crossroads of masculinity and physical disability. Masculinities, 1994, 2, 34-55.
10.
GERSCHICK, T. J., & MILLER, A. S.Coming to terms: Masculinity and physical disability. In D. Sabo and D. F. Gordon (Eds.), Men's health and illness: Gender, power, and the body. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 183-204.
11.
GOFFMAN, E.Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
12.
GROCH, S. A.Oppositional consciousness: Its manifestation and development. The case of people with disabilities. Sociological Inquiry, 1994, 64, 369-395.
13.
HAHN, H.Sports and the political movement of disabled persons: Examining nondisabled social values. Arena Review, 1984, 8, 1-15.
14.
HAHN, H.The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44, 39-47.
15.
HIGGINS, P. C.Societal reaction and the physically disabled: Bringing the impairment back in. Symbolic Interaction, 1980, 3, 139-156.
16.
KAISER, S. B., FREEMAN, C. M., & WINGATE, S. B.Stigmata and negotiated outcomes: Management of appearance by persons with physical disabilities. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Deviant behaviorNew York: Hemisphere, 1990, pp. 444-464.
17.
LEVITIN, T. E.Deviants as active participants in the labeling process: The visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 1975, 22, 548-557.
18.
MAXWELL, J. A.Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
19.
MAYERSON, A.Title I-Employment provisions of the Americans with disabilities act. Temple Law Review, 1991, 64, 499-520.
MESSNER, M.Boyhood, organized sports, and the construction of masculinities. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1990, 18, 416-444. (a)
22.
MESSNER, M. A.Men studying masculinity: Some epistemological issues in sport sociology. Sociology of Sport Journal, 1990, 7, 136-153. (b)
23.
MESSNER, M. A.Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon, 1992.
24.
MILLER, J. B.Domination and subordination. In P S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin's, 1995, pp. 57-64.
25.
NIXON, H. L. II. Handicapism and sport: New directions for sport sociology research. In N. Theberge and P Donnelly (Eds.), Sport and the sociological imagination. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1984, pp. 162-176.
26.
PFUHI, E. H., & HENRY, S.The deviance process (3rd ed.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993.
27.
SAGE, G. H.Power and ideology in American sport: A critical perspective. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1990.
28.
SCHUR, E. M.Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
29.
SHONTZ, F. C.Body image and physical disability. In T. F. Cash and T Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990, pp. 149-169.
30.
SUSMAN, J.Disability, stigma and deviance. Social Science and Medicine, 1994, 38, 15-22.
31.
WANG, C.Culture, meaning and disability: Injury prevention campaigns and the production of stigma. Social Science and Medicine, 1992, 35, 1093-1102.
32.
WARREN, C. A. B.Destigmatization of identity: From deviant to charismatic. Qualitative Sociology, 1980, 3, 59-72.
33.
WENDELL, S.Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 1989, 4(2), 104-124.
34.
WOLF, C.Legitimation of oppression: Response and reflexivity. Symbolic Interaction, 1986, 9, 217-234.
