The current study explored the extent to which college graduates with and without physical disabilities reported experiencing discrimination in their overall work histories. Resufts suggested that respondents with disabilities reported experiencing significantly more access discrimination than respondents without disabilities and that the specific type of physical disability influenced the extent of access discrimination experienced. There were no significant differences in the extent of treatment discrimination experienced by individuals with and without disabilities. The current study also explored the level of job satisfaction reported by currently employed respondents with and without physical disabilities. Results indicated that access discrimination significantly reduced current job satisfaction, and, when it was statistically controlled, individuals with disabilities reported marginally higher levels of job satisfaction than individuals without physical disabilities. These and other resufts are presented and their implications are discussed.
Aarts, L.J.M. , Burkhauser, R.V. & De Jong, P.R.A comparison of European and United States disability policy. In T. Thomason, J. Burton, Jr, and D.E. Hyatt (Eds), New approaches to disability. Madison, WI: Industrial Rela-tions Research Association, 1998, pp. 299-338.
2.
Ash, A. , Bellew, J., Davies, M., Newman, T. & Richardson, L.Everybody in? The experience of disabled students in further education. Disability & Society, 1997, 12, 605-621.
3.
Baldwin, M. & Johnson, W.G.Labor market discrimination against men with disabilities. The Journal of Human Resources, 1994, 29, 1-19.
4.
Bender, L.F.1980 Presidential address to the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine . Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1981, 23, 103-108.
5.
Benshoff, J.J. , Kroeger, S.A. & Scalia, V.A.Career maturity and academic achievement in college students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1990, 56, 40-44.
6.
Bordieri, J.E. & Drehmer, D.E.Hiring decisions for disabled workers: Looking at the cause. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 16, 197-208.
7.
Bowman, J.T.Attitudes toward disabled persons: Social distance and work competence . Journal of Rehabilitation, 1987, 53, 41-44.
8.
Braddock, D.L. & Bachelder, L.The glass ceiling and persons with disabilities. Institute on Disability and Human Development, College of Associated Health Professions, University of Illinois at Chicago, Monograph Series, No. 56. Chicago, IL, 1994.
9.
Bressler, R.B. & Lacy, A. W.An analysis of the relative job progression of the perceptibly physically handicapped. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23, 132-143.
10.
Cesare, S.J. , Tannenbaum, R.J. & Dalessio, A.Interviewers' decisions related to applicant handicap type and rater empathy. Human Performance, 1990, 3, 157-171.
11.
Colella, A. , Denisi, A.S. & Varma, A.The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. Journal of Applied Psychol-ogy, 1998, 83, 102-111.
12.
Colorez, A. & Geist, G.O.Rehabilitation vs general employer attitudes toward hiring disabled persons. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1987, 53, 44-47.
13.
Croft, B.Assisting the disabled . Personnel Journal, 1996, 75(7), 89-91.
14.
Czajka, J.M. & DeNisi, A.S.Effects of emotional disability and clear perform-ance standards on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 394-404.
15.
D'Arcy, C. , Syrotuik, J. & Siddique, C.M.Perceived job attributes, job satisfac-tion, and psychological distress: A comparison of working men and women. Human Relations, 1984, 37, 603-611.
Drehmer, D.E. & Bordieri, J.E.Hiring decisions for disabled workers: The hidden bias. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1985, 30, 157-164.
18.
Employment Gazette, 1995, 103(1), LFS 47.
19.
Esses, V.M. & Beaufoy, S.L.Determinants of attitudes toward people with dis-abilities. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1994, 9, 43-64.
20.
Fichten, C.S. & Amnsel, R.Trait attributions about college students with a physi-cal disability: Circumplex analysis and methodological issues. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 16, 410-427.
21.
Frank, K. , Karst, R. & Boles, C.After graduation: The quest for employment by disabled college graduates. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 1989, 20, 3-7.
22.
Fuqua, D.R. , Rathbun, M. & Gade, E.M.A comparison of employer attitudes toward the worker problems of eight types of disabled workers. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 1984, 15, 40-43.
23.
Goldblum, M.Reengineering: The new disability methodology . NOSSCR Social Security Forum, 1995, 17, 4-6.
24.
Goodyear, D.L. & Stude, E.W.Work performance: A comparison of severely dis-abled and non-disabled employees. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 1975, 6, 210-216.
25.
Gouvier, W.D. , Steiner, D.D., Jackson, W.T., Schlater, D. & Rain, J.S.Employment discrimination against handicapped job candidates: An analog study of the effects of neurological causation, visibility of handicap, and public contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1991, 36, 121-129.
26.
Greenwood, R. & Johnson, V.A.Employer perspectives on workers with dis-abilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1987, 53, 37-45.
Hall, F.S. & Hall, E.L.The ADA: Going beyond the law. Academy of Management Executive, 1994, 8, 17-26.
29.
Haveman, R.H. & Wolfe, B.The economic well-being of the disabled, 1962-1984. Journal of Human Resources, 1990, 25, 32-54.
30.
Hendricks, W. , Schiro-Geist, C. & Broadbent, E.Long term disabilities and college education. Industrial Relations, 1997, 36, 46-60.
31.
Hodson, R.Gender differences in job satisfaction: Why aren't women more dis-satisfied?The Sociological Quarterly, 1989, 30, 385-399.
32.
Jagger, L. , Neukrug, E. & McAuliffe, G.Congruence between personality traits and chosen occupation as a predictor of job satisfaction for people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1992, 36, 53-60.
33.
Jiranek, D. & Kirby, N.The job satisfaction and/or psychological well being of young adults with an intellectual disability and nondisabled young adults in either sheltered employment, competitive employment or unemploy-ment. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1990, 16, 133-148.
34.
Johnson, R. & Heal, L.W.Private employment agency responses to the physi-cally handicapped applicant in a wheelchair. Journal of Applied Rehabili-tation Counseling, 1976, 7, 12-29.
35.
Johnson, W.G. & Baldwin, M.The Americans with disabilities act: Will it make a difference?Policy Studies Journal, 1993, 21, 775-788.
36.
Johnson, W.G. & Lambrinos, J.The effect of prejudice on the wages of disabled workers. Policy Studies Journal, 1987, 15, 571-590.
37.
Johnson, V.A. , Greenwood, R. & Schriner, K.F.Work performance and work personality: Employer concerns about workers with disabilities. Rehabili-tation Counseling Bulletin, 1988, 32, 50-57.
38.
Jones, G.E.Advancement opportunity issues for persons with disabilities . Human Resource Management Review, 1997, 7, 55-76.
39.
Kilbury, R.E , Benshoff, J.J. & Rubin, S.E.The interaction of legislation, public attitudes, and access opportunities for persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1992, 58, 6-9.
40.
Kitchin, R. , Shirlow, P. & Shuttleworth, I.On the margins: Disabled people's experience of employment in Donegal, West Ireland. Disability and Society, 1998, 13, 785-806.
41.
Krefting, L.A. & Brief, A.P.The impact of applicant disability on evaluative judgments in the selection process. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 675-680.
42.
Lefkowitz, J.Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: Now you see them , ... Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 323-349.
43.
Lester, R.A. & Caudill, D.W.The handicapped worker: Seven myths. Training and Development Journal, 1987, 41(8), 50-51.
44.
McAffee, J.K.The handicapped worker and job satisfaction . Vocational Evalu-ation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 1986, 19, 23-27.
45.
Macan, T.H. & Hayes, T.L.Both sides of the employment interview interaction: Perceptions of interviewers and applicants with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1995, 40, 261-278.
46.
McFarlin, D.B. , Song, J. & Sonntag, M.Integrating the disabled into the workforce: A survey of Fortune 500 company attitudes and practices. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1991, 4, 107-123.
47.
Mahoney, D.J.Factors affecting the success of the mentally retarded in employment . Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 1976, 4, 38-51.
48.
Marchioro, C.A. & Bartels, L.K.Perceptions of a job interviewee with a disabil-ity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1994, 9, 383-394.
49.
Mithaug, D.E.Negative employer attitudes toward hiring the handicapped: Fact or fiction?Journal of Contemporary Business, 1980, 8, 19-44.
Moseley, C.R.Job satisfaction research: Implication for supported employment . Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 1988, 13, 211-219.
52.
Oldham, G. , Kulik, C.T. & Stepina, L.Physical environments and employee reac-tions: Effects of stimulus-screening and job complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 929-938.
53.
Patterson, J.B. & Witten, B.Myths concerning person with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 1987, 18, 42-44.
54.
Perry, E.L.A cognitive approach to understanding discrimination: A closer look at applicant gender and age . Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 1997, 15, 175-240.
55.
Roos, P.A. & Treiman, D.J.Worker functions and worker traits for the l970 US census classification. In A.R. Miller, D.J. Treiman, P.S. Cain and P.A. Roos (Eds), Work, jobs and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1980, pp. 336-389.
56.
Rose, G.L. & Brief, A.P.Effects of handicap and job characteristics on selection evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 1979, 32, 385-392.
57.
Stone, C.I. & Sawatzki, B.Hiring bias and the disabled interviewee: Effects of manipulating work history and disability information of the disabled job applicant. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1980, 16, 96-104.
58.
Stone, D.L. & Colella, A.A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21, 352-401.
59.
Stone, E.F. , Stone, D.L. & Dipboye, R.L.Stigmas in organizations: Race handi-caps, and physical unattractiveness. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992, pp. 385-457.
60.
Terborg, J.R. & Ilgen, D.R.A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in tra-ditionally masculine occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 352-376.
61.
Test, D.W. , Hinson, K.B., Keul, P. & Solow, J.Job satisfaction of persons in supported employment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 1993, 28, 8-46.
62.
Thompson, A.R. & Dickey, K.D.Self-perceived job search skills of college students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1994, 37, 358-370.
63.
Tringo, J.L.The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups . The Journal of Special Education, 1970, 4, 295-306.
64.
Tseng, M.S.Job performance and satisfaction of successfully rehabilitated voca-tional rehabilitation clients . Rehabilitation Literature, 1975, 36, 66-72.
65.
Warr, P.Age and employment. In H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 4. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1994, pp. 485-550.
66.
Weiss, D.J. , Dawis, R.V., England, G.W & Lofquist, L.H.Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation Bulletin, 22. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1967.
