A survey of 137 employees provided data on performance appraisal reviews conducted by 38 managers. Participation in the review was influenced more by which manager conducted the review than the circumstances of the specific review. The effect of participation was greater for variables measuring future relationship (potential in the firm and seeking feedback from manager) than immediate decisions (self-evaluation and intention to stay). Reaction to the review was moderated by subordinate experience and prior feedback. The results indicate the importance of understanding the context in which the review occurs and the limited degree to which managers alter their own behavior in the review.
ASHFORD, S. J., & CUMMINGS, L. L.Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies for creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 32, 370-398.
2.
BECKER, T E., & KLIMOSKI, R. J.A field study of the relationship between organizational feedback environment and performance. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 343-358.
3.
BLACK, J. S., & GREGERSEN, H. B.Participative decision making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 1997, 50, 859-878.
4.
CASTROGIOVANNI, G. J., & MACY, B. A.Organizational information-processing capabilities and degree of employee participation: A longitudinal field experiment. Group and Organizational Studies, 1990, 15, 313-336.
5.
EREZ, M., EARLEY, P C., & HULIN, C. L.The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two step model. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, 28, 50-66.
6.
FEDOR, D. B., RENSVOLD, R. B., & ADAMS, S. M.An investigation of factors expected to affect feedback seeking: A longitudinal field study. Personnel Psychology, 1992, 45, 779-805.
7.
FELDMAN, D. C., & BRETT, J.Coping with new jobs: A comparative study of new hires. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26, 258-272.
8.
FIEDLER, F E.A theory of leader effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
9.
FRENCH, J. R. P, KAY, E., & MEYER, H. H.Participation and the appraisal system. Human Relations, 1966, 19, 3-20.
10.
GLEW, D. J., O'LEARY-KELLY, A. M., GRIFFIN, R. W, & VAN FLEET D. D.Participation in organizations: Preview of the issues and proposed framework for future analysis. Journal of Management, 1995, 21, 395-421.
11.
GREENHAUS, J. H., PARASURAMAN, S., & WORMLEY, W M.Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33, 64-86.
12.
GRELLER, M. M.The nature of subordinate participation in the appraisal interview. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 646-658.
13.
GRELLER, M. M.Feedback on, job performance and expected career advancement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1992, 75, 1323-1329.
14.
GRELLER, M. M., & JACKSON, J. H.The effect of subordinate's level of experience and prior feedback on participation in the performance appraisal reviews. Psychological Reports, 1997, 80, 547-561.
15.
GRELLER, M. M., & PARSONS, C. K.Feedback and feedback inconsistency as sources of strain and self evaluation. Human Relations, 1992, 45, 601-620.
16.
GRELLER, M. M., & PARSONS, C. K.Contingent pay systems and job performance feedback. Group and Organization Management, 1995, 20, 90-108.
17.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
18.
HANSER, L. M., & MUCHINSKY, P M.Work as an information environment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 21, 47-60.
19.
HEROLD, D. M., & GRELLER, M. M.Feedback: The definition of a construct. Academy of Management Joumal, 1977, 20, 142-147.
20.
HEROLD, D. M., & PARSONS, C. K.Assessing the feedback environment in a work organization: Development of the Job Feedback Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70, 290-305.
21.
HEROLD, D. M., PARSONS, C. K., & RENSVOLD, R. B.Individual differences in the generation and processing of performance feedback. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1996, 56, 5-25.
22.
HlkLLERY, J. M., & WEXLEY, K. N.Participation in appraisal interviews conducted in a training situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 168-171.
23.
ILGEN, D. R., FISHER, C. D., & TAYLOR, M. S.Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 349-371.
24.
KAY, E., MEYER, H. H., & FRENCH, J. R. P, Jr.Effects of threat in the performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 311-317.
25.
KEIRSEY, D., & BATES, M.Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Books, 1978.
26.
LARSON, J. R., Jr.The dynamic interplay between employees feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors' delivery of performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 408-422.
27.
LATHAM, G. P, WINTERS, D. C., & LOCKE, E. A.Cognitive and motivational effects of participation. Joumal of Organizational Behavior, 1994, 15, 49-63.
28.
LEFTON, R. E., BUZZOTTA, V R., SHERBERG, M., & KARRAKER, D. L.Effective motivation through performance appraisal Dimensional appraisal strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
29.
LEVY, P E., & STEELMAN, L. A.Determinants of Feedback Seeking: Cost Environment and the Performance Appraisal Process. Paper presented at the Meetings of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN, 1994.
30.
LEVY, P E., ALBRIGHT, M. D., CAWLEY, B. D., & WILLIAMS, J. R.Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 62, 23-37.
31.
LOCKE, E. A., & LATHAM, G. PA theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.
32.
LOCKE, E. A., SCHWEIGER, D. M., & LATHAM, G. PParticipation in organizational decision making: When should it be used. Organizational Dynamics, 1986, 14(3), 65-79.
33.
LOCKE, E. A., LATHAM, G. R., & EREZ, M.The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 14, 23-35.
34.
MAIER, N. R. FPsychology in industry. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1946.
35.
MAIER, N. R. FThe appraisal interview: Three basic approaches. La Jolla, CA: University Associates, 1976.
36.
MANN, R. D., ARNOLD, S. M., BINDER, J. L., CYTRYNBAUM, S., NEWMAN, B. M., RINGWALD, B. E., RINGWALD, J. W, & ROSENWEIN, R.The college classroom: Conflict, change, and leaming. New York: Wiley, 1970.
37.
MEYER, H. H.A solution to the performance appraisal enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 1991, 5, 68-76.
38.
MEYER, H. H., KAY, E. E., & FRENCH, J. R. P, Jr.Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43(1), 123-129.
39.
NATHAN, B. R., MOHRMAN, A. M., Jr., & MILLIMAN, J.Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34, 352-369.
40.
ROGERS, C. R., & ROETHLISBERGER, F J.Barriers and gateways to communication. Harvard Business Review, 1952, 30(4), 46-52.
41.
SCHRAUGER, J. S.Responses to evaluation as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 581-596.
42.
SMITH, H. P, & BROUWER, P J.Performance appraisal and human development. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1977.
43.
STEEL, R. P, & MENTO, A. J.The participation-performance controversy reconsidered: Subordinate competencies as a moderating factor. Group and Organizational Studies, 1987, 12, 411-423.
44.
TSUI, A. S., & ASHFORD, S. J.Adaptive self-regulation: A process view of managerial effectiveness. Journal of Management, 1994, 20, 93-121.
45.
VROOM, V H., & JAGO, A. G.The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
46.
VROOM, V H., & YETTON, P WLeadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.
47.
WAGNER, J. A. III. Participation's effects on performance and satisfaction: a reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19, 312-330.
48.
WAGNER, J. A. III, LEANNA, C. R., LOCKE, E. A., & SCHWEIGER, D. M.Cognitive and motivational frameworks in U.S. research on participation: A meta-analysis of primary research effects. Joumal of Organizational Behavior, 1997, 18, 49-65.
49.
WEXLEY, K, N., & KLIMOSKI, R.Performance appraisal: An update. In G. R. Ferris and K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Performance evaluation, goal setting, and feedback. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990, pp. 1-45.
