An Assessment of Extrinsic Feedback on Participation,Role Perceptions,Motivation,and Job Satisfaction in a Self-Managed System for Monitoring Group Achievement
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 1991
An Assessment of Extrinsic Feedback on Participation,Role Perceptions,Motivation,and Job Satisfaction in a Self-Managed System for Monitoring Group Achievement
A longitudinal field experiment was conducted to examine a participative scheme for measuring productivity and some of the system outcomes. In addition to evaluating the robustness of the participative monitoring system, the impact of extrinsic feedback on participation, role indices, motivation, productivity, and job satisfaction was assessed. It was reported by subjects of 76 geographically-dispersed maintenance groups of a State railway that extraneous feedback had a significant influence on role ambiguity, motivation, job satisfaction, and productivity, and a number of the variable causal paths. However, contrary to predictions, which were based mainly on correlational research, substantially lower role stress levels were not encountered after the participative scheme was installed. The results are discussed.
AKIN, G., & HOPELAIN, D.Finding the culture of productivity. Organizational Dynamics, 1986, 14(3), 19-32.
2.
ARMITAGE, H. M.The use of management accounting techniques to improve productivity analysis in distribution operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 1984, 14(1), 41-51.
3.
Australia reconstructed: ACTU/TDC mission to Western Europe.Canberra, AGPS, 1987.
4.
BRIEF, A. P., & ALDAG, R. J.Correlates of role indices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61(4), 468-472.
5.
CAMMANN, C., FICHMAN, M., JENKINS, D., & KLESH, J. The Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1979. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
CHEW, W. B.No-nonsense guide to measuring productivity. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1988, 110-120.
7.
CHOWDHURY, A. R.The basics of productivity analysis. Quality Progress, 1986, 19(10), 68-70.
8.
COHEN-ROSENTHAL, E.Orienting labor-management cooperation toward revenue and growth. National Productivity Review, 1985, 4(4), 385-396.
9.
COOK, J. D., HEPWORTH, S. J., WALL, T. D., & WARR, P. B.The experience of work: A compendium and review of 249 measures and their use. London: Academic Press, 1981.
10.
DECI, E. L.The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 1972, 8, 217-229.
11.
DUNOON, D.Reform in the workplace. Directions in Government, April, 1990, 31-33.
12.
EARLEY, P. C., & KANFER, R.The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 36, 378-390.
13.
EMERY, F. E.Characteristics of sociotechnical systems. London: Tavistock, 1959.
14.
FROST, D. E.Role perceptions and behavior of the immediate superior: Moderating effect on the prediction of leadership effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983, 31, 123-142.
15.
GREENHOUSE, S. W., & GEISSER, S.On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 1959, 24(2), 95-112.
16.
GRIFFIN, R. W.Consequences of quality circles in an industrial setting: A longitudinal assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31(2), 338-358.
17.
GRIFFIN, R. W., WELSH, A., & MOORHEAD, G.Perceived task characteristics and employee performance: A literature review. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6(4), 655-664.
18.
GUZZO, R. A., JETTE, R. D., & KATZELL, R. A.The effects of psychologically-based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 1985, 38(2), 275-291.
19.
HACKMAN, J. R., & OLDHAM, G. R.Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 159-170.
20.
HAMNER, W. C., & TOSI, H. L.Relationship of role conflict and role ambiguity to job involvement measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59(4), 497-499.
21.
ILGEN, D. R., FISHER, C. D., & TAYLOR, M. S.Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 349-371.
22.
IVANCEVICH, J. M., & McMAHON, J. T.The effects of goal setting, external feedback, and self-generated feedback on outcome variables: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25(2), 359-372.
23.
JACKSON, S. E.Participation in decision making as a strategy for reducing job-related strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68(1), 3-19.
24.
JAMAL, M.Relationship of job stress to job performance: A study of managers and blue collar workers. Human Relations, 1985, 38(5), 409-424.
25.
KIM, J. S.Effect of behavior plus outcome goal setting and feedback on employee satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, 27(1), 139-149.
26.
LAWLER, E. E., & MOHRMAN, S. A.Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb. 1985, 65-71.
27.
MARGULIES, N., & BLACK, S.Perspectives on the implementation of participative approaches. Human Resource Mangement, 1987, 26, 385-412.
28.
MARKS, M. L., MIRVIS, P. H., HACKETT, E. J., & GRADY, J. F.Employee participation in a quality circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71(1), 61-69.
29.
MATSUI, T., KAKUYAMA, T., & ONGLATCO, M. L.Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72(3), 407-415.
30.
MITCHELL, T. R.Motivation and participation: An integration. Academy of Management Journal, 1973, 16(4), 670-679.
31.
MORRIS, J. H., & KOCH, J. L.Impacts of role perceptions on organizational commitment, job involvement, and psychosomatic illness among three vocational groupings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1979, 14, 88-101.
32.
MORRIS, J. H., STEERS, R. M., & KOCH, J. L.Influence of organization structure on role conflict and ambiguity for three occupational groupings. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22(1), 58-71.
33.
ODEN, H. W.An interactive productivity measurement model using spreadsheet software. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1986, 11(1), 325-329.
34.
O'DONNELL, M., & O'DONNELL, R. J.Quality circles-The latest fad or a real winner?Business Horizons, May-June, 1984, 48-52.
35.
PAVETT, C. M.Evaluation of the impact of feedback on performance and motivation. Human Relations, 1983, 36(7), 641-654.
36.
PEARSON, C. A. L., & LEONHARDT, R. P.Improving performance with participative work planning-A longitudinal assessment with track maintenance gangs. In Conference on Railway Engineering 1987, Perth. Better Printing, 1987, pp. 63-69.
37.
PRITCHARD, R. D., JONES, S. D., ROTH, P. L., STUEBING, K. K., & EKEBERG, S. E.Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73(2), 337-358.
38.
Productivity in Australia: Results of recent studies. Economic Planning Advisory Council, Canberra, AGPS, 1989.
39.
RIGGS, J. L.Monitoring with a matrix that motivates as it measures. Industrial Engineering, Jan. 1986, 34-43.
40.
RIGGS, J. L., & TEN PAS, L. A.A productivity audit: The development and use of PROD-5. National Productivity Review, 1985, 4(4), 354-369.
41.
RIZZO, J. R., HOUSE, R. J., & LIRTZMAN, S. I.Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1970, 15, 150-163.
42.
ROSENBERG, R. D., & ROSENSTEIN, E.Participation and productivity: An empricial study. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1980, 33(3), 355-367.
43.
SCHAUBROECK, J., COTTON, J. L., & JENNINGS, K. R.Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1989, 10, 35-58.
44.
SCHILLING, D. J., & BREMER, T. F.Implementing productivity strategies: A program case study at TRW Ramsey. National Productivity Review, 1985, 4(4), 370-384.
45.
SCHROEDER, R. G., ANDERSON, J. C., & SCUDDER, G. D.Measurement of white-collar productivity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 1985, 5(2), 25-34.
46.
SCHULER, R. S.Role perceptions, satisfaction, and performance: A partial reconciliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 683-687.
47.
SCHULER, R. S.A role and expectancy perception model of participation in decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(2), 331-340.
48.
SCHULER, R. S., & KIM, J. S.Employees' expectancy perceptions as explanatory variables for effectiveness of participation in decision making. Psychological Reports, 1978, 43, 651-656.
49.
SCHULER, R. S., ALDAG, R. J., & BRIEF, A. P.Role conflict and ambiguity: A scale analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 20, 111-128.
50.
SEASHORE, S. E., LAWLER, E. E., MIRVIS P. H. & CAMMANN, C. (Eds.). Observing and meaning of organizational change: A guide to field practice. New York: Wiley, 1982.
51.
SIMS, H. P., & MANZ, C. C.Conversations within self-managed work groups. National Productivity Review, Summer 1982, 261-269.
52.
SINK, D. S.Performance and productivity measurement: The art of developing creative scoreboards. Industrial Engineering, 1986, 18, 34-43.
53.
SINK, D. S., TUTTLE, T. C., & DeVRIES, S. J.Productivity measurement and evaluation: What is available?National Productivity Review, 1984, 3(3), 265-287.
54.
STEERS, R. M., & PORTER, L. W.The role of task goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 434-452.
55.
TRIST, E. L., HIGGINS, G. W., MURRAY, H., & POLLOCK, A. B.Organizational Choice. London: Tavistock, 1963.
56.
TUTTLE, T. C., & ROMANOWSKI, J. J.Assessing performance and productivity in whitecollar organizations. National Productivity Review, 1985, 4, 211-224.
57.
VROOM, V. H.Some personality determinants of the effects of participation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1960.
58.
VROOM, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
59.
WALL, T. D., & CLEGG, C. W.A longitudinal field study of work group design. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1981, 2, 31-49.
60.
WALL, T. D., KEMP, N. J., JACKSON, P. R., & CLEGG, C. W.Outcomes of autonomous work groups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, 29(2), 280-304.
