This paper deals with the three waves of the discourse on group work in social science and industrial practice that have helped pave the way for the current boom in the introduction of group work in companies. These waves are represented by the human relations approach, the sociotechnical systems approach, and the lean management debate. They are reviewed in two perspectives. The first relates to their concepts of work design and group work, following four questions: (a) What emphasis is put on work factors or on subjective orientations, on the design of working conditions or symbolic strategies? (b) How do the various approaches address the relationship between efficiency and control? (c) Which concepts of participation or democracy are involved? (d) How is the role of the social scientist in the process of industrial modernization conceptualized, explicitly or implicitly? The second perspective from a sociology of science relates to the context of production and utilization of social scientific knowledge. In general, two theses are put forward. The first states that a gap exists between the aspirations and reality of group work because the basic conflict of efficiency and control has been overlooked for ideological reasons. The second postulates that there is no linear progress in the theory and practice of group work. It seems that the socioeconomical context determines reasonably which group concept and ideology dominates certain historical phases of industrial modernization.
ACKROYD, S., & THOMPSON, P.All quiet on the workplace front. A critique of trends in recent British industrial sociology. Sociology, 1995, 29(4), 615-633.
3.
ADAIR, J. G., SHARPE, D., & HUYNH, C. L.Placebo, Hawthorne, and other artifact controls: Researchers, opinions and practices. Journal of Experimental Education, 1989, 57341-355.
4.
ADLER, P. S., & COLE, R. E.Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. In A. Sandberg (Ed.), Enriching production. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995, pp. 157-177.
5.
ALTMANN, N.How do German trade unions perceive the "Japanese way of manufacturing?"The Keizai Gaku, 1995, 53(3), 411-423.
6.
ALTSHULER, A., ANDERSON, M., JONES, D., ROOS, D., & WOMACK, C.The Future of the Automobile. The Report of MIT's International Automobile Program. London/Sydney, 1984.
7.
ARENDT, H.Vita Activa. Munchen: Piper, 1967.
8.
BECK, U.The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 1-56.
9.
BERGGREN, C.Alternatives to lean production: Work organization in the Swedish auto industry. Ithaca, New York: ILR Press, 1992.
10.
BERGGREN, C., & BJORKMANN, T.Contradictions in the team concept. Auto transplants and labor relations in North America. In S. Tokunaga et al. (Eds.), New impacts on industrial relations. Munchen: ludicium, 1992, pp. 149-180.
11.
BLACKLER, F. H. M.Job redesign and social policies. In J. E. Kelly and C. W. Clegg (Eds.), Autonomy and control at the workplace, 1982, pp. 157-180.
12.
BOLWEG, J. F.Job design and industrial democracy. In L. E. Davis and J. C. Taylor (Eds.), Design of jobs (2nd ed.). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Co., 1979, pp. 230-239.
13.
BRAMEL, D., & FRIEND, R.Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 867-878.
14.
CAREY, A.The Hawthorne studies. A radical criticism. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32(1), 403-416.
15.
CARLINER, L.Deep therapy on the assembly line. Ammunition, 1949, 7-7.
16.
CHERNS, A. B., & WACKER, G. J.Analyzing social systems: An application of Parsons' macrosystem model to the organizational level and the sociotechnical perspective. Human Relations, 1978, 31, 823-842.
17.
CHERNS, A. B.Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 1987, 40, 153-162.
18.
COOKE, PH.The Experiences of German Engineering Firms in Applying Lean Management Methods. Paper for the 2nd Meeting "Lean Management and Beyond,"Geneva, Nov. 5-6, 1992.
19.
CUMMINGS, T., & BLUMBERG, M.Advanced manufacturing technology and work design. In T Wall et al. (Eds.), The human side of advanced manufacturing technology, Chichester: Wiley, 1987, pp. 37-60.
20.
DERTOUZOS, M. L., LESTER, R. K., & SOLOW, R. L.Made in America. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989.
21.
DICKSON, W.An engineering study of human fatigue. In Hawthorne Studies Collection, 1931.
22.
DOHSE, K., JURGENS, U., & MALSCH, T.Vom "Fordismus" zum "Toyotismus?"Leviathan, 1984, 12(4), 448-477.
23.
DONHAM, W.Education for responsible living: The opportunity for liberal-arts-colleges. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1944.
24.
ELDEN, M.Autonomy at work and participation in politics. In A. Cherns (Ed.), Quality of working life and the kibbutz experience, Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions, 1980, pp. 230-256.
25.
EMERY, F., & EMERY, M.Participative design. Canberra: Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University, 1974.
26.
EMERY, F., & THORSRUD, E.Democracy at work. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.
27.
EMERY, F.Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In F Emery (Ed.), The emergence of a new paradigm of work. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Continuing Education, 1978, pp. 38-86.
28.
EMERY, F.Socio-technical foundations for a new social order? In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science-A Tavistock anthology. Vol. II: The sociotechnical perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993, pp. 234-253. (a)
29.
EMERY, F.The nine-step model. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), 1993, pp. 569-579. (b)
30.
EMERY, F.The second design principle-Participation and democratization of work. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science-A Tavistock anthology. Vol. II: The socio-technical perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993, pp. 214-233. (c)
31.
ETZIONI, A.The moral dimension. Toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press, 1988.
32.
FRANKE, R., & KAUL, J.The Hawthorne-experiments: First statistical interpretation. In American Sociological Review, 1978, 43623-643.
33.
FRESE, M., & ZAPF, D.Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In M. D. Dunnette, I. M. Hough, and H. C. Triandis (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizationalpsychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1994, pp. 271-340.
34.
FRIEDMAN, A.Managementstrategien und technologie. In E. Hildebrandt and R. Seltz (Eds.), Managementstrategien und Kontrolle, Berlin: Edition Sigma, 1987, pp. 99-136.
35.
FUCINI, J. J., & FUCINI, S.Working the Japanese way. Inside Mazda's auto plant. New York: Free Assoc. Press, 1990.
36.
GIDDENS, A.Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 55-109.
37.
GILLESPIE, R.Manufacturing knowledge. A history of the Hawthome experiments. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.
38.
GRAHAM, L.Inside a Japanese transplant. Work and Occupations, 1993, 2, 147-173.
39.
HACKMAN, J. R.The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986, pp. 315-342.
40.
HALMOS, P., & ALBROW, P. (Eds.). The sociology of science. Keele, 1972.
41.
HAMMER, M., & CHAMPY, J.Reengineering work. A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Collins, 1993.
42.
HERBST, D. P. G.Autonomous group functioning. London: Social Science Paperbacks/Tavistock Publications, 1962.
43.
HERBST, D. P. G.Kontextbezogene vernetzung von arbeit, forschung und lernen-Eine skizze fur die dritte phase des demokratisierungsprogramms. Psychosozial, 1988, 11(33), 113-121.
44.
IMAI, M.Kaizen. Der Schlussel zum Erfolg der Japaner im Wettbewerb (The Key to Japan's Competitive Success, 1986). Landsberg: Moderne Industrie, 1992.
45.
JONES, S. R.Was there a Hawthorne effect?American Journal of Sociology, 1992, 98(3), 451-468.
46.
JURGENS, U.Mythos und realitat von lean production. FB/IE, 1993, 42(1), 18-23.
47.
KELLY, J. E.A reappraisal of sociotechnical systems theory. Human Relations, 1978, 31, 1069-1099.
48.
KNORR-CETINA, K., & MULKAY, M. (Eds.). Science observed. Perspectives in the study of science. London, 1983.
49.
KOJIMA, T.Die zweite lean-revolution. Landsberg: Moderne Industrie, 1995.
50.
KRAFCIK, J. F., & MACDUFFIE, J. P.Explaining High Performance Manufacturing. The International Automotive Assembly Study, Working Paper, MIT, 1989.
51.
KUMAZAWA, M.Industrial relations and management in Japanese companies in Europe. In S. Tokunaga et al. (Eds.), New impacts on industrial relations, Munchen: ludicium, 1992, pp. 97-116.
52.
LAPPE, L.Technologie, qualifikation und kontrolle. Die labor process debatte aus der sicht der deutschen industriesoziologie. Soziale Welt, 1986, 37(2/3), 311-330.
53.
LUTZ, B., & SCHMIDT, G.Industriesoziologie. In R. Konig (Ed.), Handbuch der empirischen sozialforschung, Band 8. Stuttgart: Enke, 1977, pp. 101-262.
54.
MAJCHRZAK, A., & GASSER, L.HITOP-A: A tool to facilitate interdisciplinary manufacturing systems design. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 1992, 2, 255-276.
55.
MAYO, E.The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan, 1933.
56.
MOLDASCHL, M.Thinking machines, dreaming engineers? Towards applied expert systems technology. In N. Altmann et al. (Eds.), Technology and work in German industry. London/New York: Routledge, 1992, pp. 92-103.
57.
MOLDASCHL, M."Die werden zur Hyane." Erfahrungen und belastungen in gruppenarbeit. In M. Moldaschl and R. Schultz-Wild (Eds.), Arbeitsorientierte rationalisierung. Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 1994, pp. 105-150.
58.
MOLDASCHL, M.Lean production im maschinenbau? In M. Moldaschl and R. Schultz-Wild (Eds.), Arbeitsorientierte rationalisierung. Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 1994, pp. 249-294. (a)
59.
MOLDASCHL, M. Kooperative netzwerke und demokratisierung. In P Schdnsleben et al. (Eds.), Werkstattmanagement. In P Schonsleben, E. Scherer, and E. Ulich (Eds.), Werkstattmanagement. Zurich: VdF, 1996, pp. S. 131-156.
60.
MUMFORD, E., & WEIR, M.Computer systems in work design-The ETHICS method, London: Associated Press, 1979.
61.
NEUBERGER, O.Mikropolitik. Stuttgart: Enke, 1995.
62.
NEUMANN, H. Mythos Japan. Untemehmensvergleich zur wettbewerbsstarke der Deutschen und Japanischen autoindustrie. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 1996.
63.
NOMURA, M., & JURGENS, U. Binnenstrukturen des Japanischen produktivitatserfolgs. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 1995.
64.
OHNO, T.Toyota production system. Cambridge: Productivity Press, 1988.
65.
PARKER, M., & SLAUGHTER, J. (Eds.). Choosing sides. Unions and the team concept, Detroit: Labor Notes, 1988.
66.
PARSONS, T.Structure and process in modem societies. New York: Free Press, 1960.
67.
PASMORE, W. A.Designing effective organizations: The socio-technical systems perspective. Chichester, NY: Wiley, 1988.
68.
PASMORE, W. A.Social science transformed: The socio-technical perspective. Human Relations, 1995, 481-21.
69.
PETERS, T. J., & WATERMAN, H.In the search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row, 1982.
70.
PETHIA, R.Pseudo-History in Management Textbooks. College of Business Administration, Western Kentucky University, Working Paper Series 2, 1983.
71.
ROETHLISBERGER, F. J., & DICKSON, W. J.Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1939.
72.
ROSE, M.Industrial behavior Theoretical developments since Taylor. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1981.
73.
SCOTT W. H.Industrial leadership and joint consultation. Liverpool, 1952.
74.
SCOTT W. H., BANKS, A., HALSEY, A. H., & LUPTON, T.Technical change and industrial relations. Liverpool, 1956.
75.
SEY, P A. Japan auf dem weg zur "arbeiterfreundlichen fabrik?" Forschungsbericht: Berlin, Daimler Benz AG, 1994.
76.
SMITH, C., & THOMPSON, P.Re-evaluating the labor process debate. In Wardell, M., Meiksins, P., and Steiger, T. (Eds.), Labor and capital in the late twentieth century: The Braverman legacy and beyond. New York: Suny Press, 1996. Forthcoming.
TRIST E. L.A socio-technical critique of scientific management. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), 1993, pp. 580-598. (a)
83.
TRIST E. L.Socio-technical ideas at the end of the '70s. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), 1993, pp. 324-337. (b)
84.
TRIST, E. L.Work improvement and organizational democracy. In E. Trist and H. Murray (Eds.), 1993, pp. 633-643. (c)
85.
TRIST E. L., HIGGIN, G. W., MURRAY, H., & POLLOCK, A. B.Organizational choice: Capabilities of groups at the coal face under changing technologies. London: Tavistock Publications, 1963.
86.
TRIST, E. L., & MURRAY, H. (Eds.). The social engagement of social science-A Tavistock anthology, Vol II: The socio-technical perspective. London: Tavistock Publications, 1993.
87.
ULICH, E.On the relations between work experience and personality development. In A. Cherns (Ed.), Quality of working life and the kibbutz experience. Norwood: Norwood Editions, 1980, pp. 217-229.
ULICH, E., & WEBER, W. G.Dimensions, criteria and evaluation of work group autonomy. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 1996.
90.
VILMAR, F. (Ed.), Menschenwurde im betrieb. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1973.
91.
VOLPERT, W. Die lohnarbeits wissenschaft und die psychologie der arbeitstatigkeit. In P GroBkurth & W Volpert (Eds.), Lohnarbeitspsychologie. Frankfurt/M: Fischer, 1975, pp. 13-196.
92.
VOLPERT, W.Work design for human development. In C. Floyd et al. (Eds.), Software development and reality construction. Berlin: Springer, 1992, pp. 336-349.
93.
WALTER-BUSCH, E.Das auge der firma. Mayo's Hawthome-experimente und die Harvard business-school, 1900-1960. Stuttgart: Enke, 1989.
94.
WEBER, W. G.Action regulation, co-operative structures and team work in manufacturing systems. In D. Brandt & T Martin (Eds.), Automated systems based on human skill. Preprints of the 5th IFAC Symposium. Berlin, Germany, Oxford: Elsevier Science, September, 26-28, pp. 47-52.
95.
WEBER, W G. Analyse von gruppenarbeit-Kollektive handlungsregulation in soziotechnischen systemen (Schriften zur Arbeitspsychologie Bd. 57). Bern: Huber, 1997.
96.
WOMACK, J. P., JONES, D., & ROOS, D.The machine that changed the world. New York/Toronto: Rawson, 1990.
