The purpose of this study was to explore the degree to which concepts drawn from North American research are applicable to marital violence among Israeli Jews. Interviews were conducted with 161 women after they gave birth in a large medical center, 29 of whom reported at least one occurrence of violent marriage (VM) during the study year. As in comparable North American research, marital violence was associated with economic hardship, with lack of collectiveness in the dyad, and with the conflict solving tactics employed by both spouses. VM women held different attitudes toward husband control and marital violence, and were emotionally dependent on their husbands. Discriminant analysis successfully classified 90% of the cases (67% of VM). The findings can be interpreted in terms of the battered women syndrome as well as in terms of a struggle for power within the family. The data strongly suggest that these may be two distinct patterns of marital violence.
AVNI, N.Battered wives: Characteristics of their courtship days. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1991, 6, 232-239.
2.
BATESON, G.Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books, 1972.
3.
BERSANI, C. A., & CHEN, H. T.Sociological perspectives in family violence. In V. B. Van Hasselt, R. L. Morrisin, A. S. Bellack, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of family violence (chap. 4). New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
4.
BROWNING, J., & DUTrON, D.Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1986, 48, 375-379.
5.
CAPLAN, P. J.The myth of women's masochism. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 130-139.
6.
COLEMAN, D. H., & STRAUS, M. A.Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1986, 1, 141-157.
7.
DELL, P. F.Violence and the systemic view: The problem of power. Family Process, 1989, 28, 1-14.
8.
DESCHNER, J. P.The hitting habit: Anger control for battering couples, New York: Free Press, 1984.
9.
DOUGLAS, H.Assessing violent couples. Families in Societies, 1991, 72, 525-534.
10.
FRISHTIK, M.The attitude of Judaism toward physical violence against women. Society and Welfare (Hebrew), 1990, 11, 26-44.
11.
GEFFNER, R., ROSENBAUM, A., & HUGHES, H.Research issues concerning family violence. In V. B. Van Hasselt, R. L. Morrisin, A. S. Bellack, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of family violence. New York: Plenum Press, 1988, pp. 457-481.
12.
GELLES, R. J.Abused wives: Why do they stay. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 36, 659-668.
13.
GELLES, R. J., & CONTE, J. R.Domestic violence and sexual abuse of children: A review of research in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1990, 52, 1045-1058.
14.
GOLDNER, V., PENN, P., SHEINBERG, M., & WALKER, G.Love and violence: Gender paradoxes in volatile attachments. Family Process, 1990, 29, 343-364.
15.
GOODE, W. J.Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1971, 33, 627-636.
16.
GRAETZ, N.The Battered Women in the Jewish Tradition. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Judaism, Psychology, and Feminism, Seattle, Oct. 29-Nov. 1st, 1992.
17.
HAMBERGER, L. K., & LOHR, J. M.Proximal causes for spouse abuse: A theoretical analysis for cognitive-behavioral intervention. In P. L. Ceasar & L. K Hamberger (Eds.), Treating men who batter: Theory, practice, and programs. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1989, pp 53-76.
18.
HELTON, A., McFARLANE, J., & ANDERSON, E.Battered and pregnant: A prevalence study. American Journal of Public Health, 1987, 77, 1337-1339.
19.
HERBERT, T. B., SILVER COHEN, R., & ELLARD, J. H.Coping with an abusive relationship: How and why do women stay?Joumal of Marriage and the Family, 1991, 53, 311-325.
20.
HILLARD, P. J.Physical abuse in pregnancy. Obstetric Gynaecology1985, 66, 185-190.
21.
KALMUSS, D. S. & STRAUS, M. A.Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1982, 44, 272-286.
22.
KRANICHFELD, M. L.Rethinking family power. Journal of Family Issues, 1987, 842-56.
23.
LONG, G. M., & McNAMARA, J. R.Paradoxical punishment as it relates to the battered women syndrome. Behavior Modification, 1989, 13, 192-205.
24.
MACK, N.Spouse abuse: A dyadic approach. In G. Weeks (Ed.), Treating couples. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1989.
25.
MARGOLIN, G., BURMAN, B, & JOHN, R. S.Home observation of married couples reenacting naturalistic conflicts. Behavioral Assessment, 1989, 11, 101-118.
26.
McCALL, G. J., & SHIELDS, N. M.Social and structural factors in family violence. In M. Lystad (Ed.), Violence in the home: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1986, pp. 98-123.
27.
OKUN, L.Women abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany, NY: State University Press, 1986.
28.
PARSONS, T.The social system (Chaps. III and V). The Free Press: London, 1964.
29.
SMITH, M. D.Sociodemographic risk factors in wife abuse: Results from a survey of Toronto women. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1990, 15, 39-58.
30.
STEINER, J.Battered women-Needs and self-image (Hebrew). Brairot: Tel-Aviv, 1989.
31.
STRAUS, M. A.Sexual inequality, cultural norms, and wife-beating. Victimology, 1976,1, 54-70.
32.
STRAUS, M. A.Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Mariage and the Family, 1979, 41, 75-88.
33.
STRAUS, M. A., & GELLES, R. J.Societal change and changes in marital violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed in two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1986, 48, 465-479.
34.
STRAUS, M. A., & GELLES, R. J.How violent are American families? Estimates from national family violence resurvey and other studies. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhore, J. T. Kirkpatric, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Family abuse and its consequences: New directions in research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988, pp. 14-36.
35.
STRAUS M. A., GELLES, R. J., & STEINMETZ, S. K.Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor Press. Doubleday, 1980.
36.
STUBE, M. J., & BARBOUR, L. S.Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1984, 46, 837-844.
37.
TEICHMAN, M, & TEICHMAN, Y.Violence in the family: An analysis in term of interpersonal resource-exchange. Journal of Family Violence, 1989, 4, 127-142.
38.
TYREE, A.Occupational socioeconomic status, ethnicity and sex in Israel (Hebrew), Megamot, 1981, 27, 7-21.
39.
WALKER, L. W. A.A feminist perspective on domestic violence. In R. B. Straus (Ed.), Violent behavior: Social learning approaches to prediction, management and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1981, pp. 102-115.
40.
WALKER, L. E. A.The battered women syndrome. New York: The Springer Publishing Company, 1984.
41.
WALKER, L. E. A.Psychological causes for family violence. In M. Lystad (Ed.), Violence in the home: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1986, pp. 71-97.
42.
WALKER, L. E. A.Terrifying love. New York: Harper & Row, 1989.
43.
WARREN, J., & LANNING, W.Sex role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 1992, 7, 108-108.
44.
YLLO, K.The status of women, marital equality, and violence against wives. Journal of Family Issues, 1984, 5, 307-320.
