Matrix Management of Projects and Power Struggles: A Case Study of an R&D Laboratory

Abstract

Matrix management of projects, it is argued, may generate normative conflict, prompting project and functional managers to engage in nonconformist conflict behavior which challenges the division of authority in matrix. An analysis of such struggles has been lacking yet. The present study fills this gap. Distinguishing between retreatism, ritualism, manipulation and rebellion, forms and outcomes of such power struggles are explored in a case study of the R&D establishment of a multinational corporation. A so-called balanced matrix was applied, in which power between both kinds of matrix managers is equally balanced. Analysis shows, how each party tried to shift the balance of power toward its side -mostly in vain however; in the end, the "hot" war between contending parties gave way to a mixture of "cold" war and willing cooperation. From the case data, organizational features other than matrix design as such are identified, that seem to affect the chances of mutual conflict escalating. Finally, it is conjectured, that types of matrix other than the balanced matrix are less susceptible to such intense power struggles, as the balance of power is not nearly equal.

Keywords

matrix management project management conflict power struggles R&D case study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADAMS, J. R. , & KIRCHOF, N. S. The practice of matrix management. In D. I. Cleland (Ed.), Matrix management systems handbook. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984, pp. 13-30.

ARGYRIS, C. Today's problems with tomorrow's organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 1967, 4, 31-55.

BARKER, J. , TJOSVOLD, D. , & ANDREWS, I. R. Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, 25, 167-178.

BLAKE, R. R. , & MOUTON, J. S. Reactions to intergroup competition under win-ose conditions. Management Science, 1961, 7, 420-435.

DE LAAT, P. Een kwestie van vertrouwen: Sociale effecten van de invoering van matrixstructuren in R&D-organisaties: Een case-studie van de organisatie-ontwikkeling bij Scholten-Honig Research (A question of trust: Social effects of the introduction of matrix structures into R&D organizations: A case study of organization development at Scholten-Honig Research). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1990.

FOX, A. A sociology of work in industry. London: Collier MacMillan, 1971.

GALBRAITH, J. R. Designing complex organizations. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.

GOBELI, D. H. , & LARSON, E. W. Relative effectiveness of different project structures. Project Management Journal, 1987, 18, 81-85.

GUNZ, H. P. , & PEARSON, A. W. Introduction of a matrix structure into an R&D establishment. R&D Management, 1977, 7, 173-181.

10.

KNIGHT, K. Matrix organization: A review. Journal of Management Studies, 1976, 13, 111-130.

11.

KNIGHT, K. (Ed.). Matrix management: A cross-functional approach to organisation. Westmead: Gower Press, 1977.

12.

KONO, T. Organizational problems of research and development. International Journal of Technology Management, 1992, 7 (special issue on strengthening corporate and national competitiveness through technology), 61-74.

13.

LARSON, E. W. , & GOBELI, D. H. Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. California Management Review, 1987, XXIX, 126-138.

14.

MASTENBROEK, W. F. G. Conflict management and organization development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

15.

MERTON, R. K. Social theory and social structure (Enlarged ed.). New York: Free Press, 1968.

16.

MINTZBERG, H. The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979.

17.

MINTZBERG, H. Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983.

18.

POSNER, B. Z. What's all the fighting about? Conflicts in project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1986, EM-33, 207-211.

19.

SHERIF, M. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63, 349-356.

20.

STUNTZ, J. W. A general manager talks about matrix management. In D. I. Cleland (Ed.), Matrix management systems handbook. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984, pp. 209-230.

21.

THAMHAIN. H. J. , & WILEMON, D. L. Conflict management in project life cycles. Sloan Management Review, Spring 1975, 31-50.

22.

THAMHAIN, H. J. , & WILEMON, D. L. Leadership, conflict, and program management effectiveness. Sloan Management Review, Fall 1977, 69-89.

23.

THOMPSON. J. D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

24.

WALTON, R. E. , & DUTTON, J. M. The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 73-84.

25.

YIN, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills/London: Sage, 1984.