Reactions to Individuals Who Are Consistently Positive or Negative: The Impact of Differing Interaction Goals

Abstract

This experiment exposed subjects to one of two interaction goals, and examined their attraction to interaction partners who differed in valence and variability. Specifically, subjects evaluated the desirability of potential interaction partners who were positive vs. negative in their evaluations of people and objects, and who exhibited high versus low variability in their evaluations. In addition, the subject's interaction goal was manipulated: Half of the subjects were led to desire self-enhancement, or to receive information increasing their self-regard; the other half were led to desire cognitive clarity, or to receive information that would increase their accurate understanding of everyday experiences. Consistent with predictions, subjects were more attracted to interaction partners who were positive than to interaction partners who were negative, and subjects were more attracted to interaction partners who were highly variable than to interaction partners who were low in variability. Also consistent with predictions, degree of attraction was influenced by the nature of the subject's interpersonal goal: When desire for self-enhancement-or the need to feel better about oneself-was made salient, subjects focused more strongly on the interaction partner's level of positivity. Conversely, when desire for cognitive clarity -or the need to obtain clarifying information about oneself and the environment -was made salient, subjects focused more strongly on degree of variability in the interaction partner's evaluations. The implications of these findings for interpersonal attraction research are discussed.

Keywords

first impressions interaction goals interpersonal attraction self-enhancement vs. enhancement of cognitive clarity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AMABILE, T. M. Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983, 19, 146-156.

ARONSON, E. , & LINDER, D. Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 156-171.

BACKMAN, C. W. , & SECORD, P. F. The effect of perceived liking on interpersonal attraction. Human Relations, 1959, 12, 379-384.

BERSCHEID, E. Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed.). New York: Random House, 1985, pp. 413-484.

BERSCHEID, E. , BROTHEN, T. , & GRAZIANO, W. Gain-loss theory and the "law of infidelity": Mr. Doting versus the admiring stranger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 709-718.

CLARK. M. S. , & REIS, H. T. Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 1988, 39, 609-672.

DEUTSCH, M. , & GERARD, H. B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 51, 629-636.

FOLKES, V. S. , & SEARS, D. O.

Does everybody like a liker?

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 505-519.

HEWITT, J. Liking and the proportion of favorable evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 231-235.

10.

INSKO, C. A. , DRENAN, S. , SOLOMON, M. R. , SMITH, R. , & WADE, T. J. Conformity as a function of the consistency of positive self-evaluation with being liked and being right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983, 19, 341-358.

11.

Insko, C. A. , Smith, R. H. , Alicke, M. D. , Wade, J. , & Taylor, S. Conformity and group size: The concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1985, 11, 41-50.

12.

JONES, E. E. , & DAVIS, K. E. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 283-329.

13.

JONES, E. E. , & McGILLIS, D. Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey , W. J. Ickes , and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1976, pp. 389-420.

14.

JONES, E. E. , & THIBAUT, J. W. Interaction goals as bases of inference in interpersonal perception. In R. Taguiri and L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1958, pp. 151-178.

15.

KELLEY, H. H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967, pp. 192-238.

16.

LANDY, D. , & ARONSON, E. Liking for an evaluator as a function of his discernment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 133-141.

17.

McCALLUM, D. M. , McCALLUM, R. , & GURWITCH, R. H. Dimensions of interpersonal events: Reward value and information value. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1987, 23, 316-330.

18.

METTEE, D. R. Changes in liking as a function of the magnitude and affect of sequential evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 157-172. (a)

19.

METTEE, D. R. The true discerner as a potent source of positive affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 292-303. (b)

20.

METTEE, D. R. , & ARONSON, E. Affective reactions to appraisal from others. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 235-283.

21.

SNYDER, C. R. & FROMKIN, H. L. Uniqueness: The human pursuit of differences. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.

22.

SWANN, W. B. To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In T. Higgins and R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. New York: Guilford Press, 1990, pp. 408-448.

23.

TOGNOLI, J. , & KEISNER, R. Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attraction: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 201-204.

24.

WALSTER, E. , WALSTER, G. W. , PILIAVIN, J. , & SCHMIDT, L. "Playing hard to get": Understanding an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 113-121.