This research was undertaken in response to a review which called for a behavioral approach to the study of leadership. The subjects of the study were the managers of sub-units in a hospital. Eleven managerial behaviors were assessed using their subordinates as untrained observers, and behaviorally-anchored questionnaires. Effectiveness was assessed by industrial engineering measures of performance and employee attitude. The results indicate that managers of sub-units of high and low morale and/or performance exhibited significantly different levels of mastery of managerial behaviors. In contrast, no differences in frequency of managerial behaviors were observed for either high or low morale units, and only one managerial behavior was observed to be significantly more frequent for managers of high and low performing units. Whereas, higher frequency of managerial behaviors was found, overall, to be associated with low and not high performing sub-units.
BERNARDIN, H. J., & BEATTY, R. W.Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent Publishing, 1984.
5.
BLAKE, R. R., & MOUTON, J. S.Grid principles versus situational: A final note. Group and Organizational Studies, 1982, 7, 211-215.
6.
BLANCHARD, K., & JOHNSON, S.One minute manager. New York: Morrow, 1982.
7.
BOLLES, R. C.Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 394-409.
8.
CAMPBELL, J. P.On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In Goodman, P. S., and Pennings (Eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: JosseyBass, 1977.
9.
CAMPION, M. A.Interdisciplinary approaches to job design: A constructive replication with extensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73, 467-481.
10.
DAVIS, T. R. V., & LUTHANS, F.Leadership reexamined: A behavioral approach. Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4, 237-248.
11.
DRUCKER, P. F., & KARL, D.Bays discuss the toughest job-Running a hospital. Hospital Management Quarterly, 1982, 4-9.
12.
FIEDLER, F. E.A Theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
13.
GREENE, C. N.The reciprocal nature of influence between leader and subordinate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 187-193.
14.
GRIFFIN, R. W., & MOORHEAD, G.Organizational behavior. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986.
15.
HATER, J. J., & BASS, B. B.Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73, 695-702.
16.
HEMPHILL, J. K., & COONS, A.Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In R. Stodgill and A. Coons (Eds.), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement (Monograph No. 88). Columbus: The Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, 1957.
17.
HITT, M. A., IRELAND, R. D., KEATS, B. W., & VIANNA, A.Measuring subunit performance. Decision Science, 1983, 14, 87-102.
18.
HOUSE, R. J.A path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 321-338.
19.
HOUSE, R. J., & BAETZ, M. L.Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1979, 1, 341-423.
20.
KLIMOSKI, R. J., & HAYES, N. J.Leader behavior and subordinate motivation. Personnel Psychology, 1980, 33, 543-555.
21.
KOSER, K., & LUSSIER, R. R.A summary of the research related to middle management. Long Beach, California: Veterans Administration Southwest Regional Medical Center, 1987.
22.
KOTTER, J.The general managers. New York: Free Press, 1982.
23.
LAWYER, III, E. E.High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
24.
LAWRENCE, P. R.Historical development of organizational behavior. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
25.
LOCKE, E. A., SHAW, K. N., SAARI, L. M., & LATHAM, G. P.Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 90, 125-152.
26.
LUTHANS, F.Successful vs. effective real managers. Academy of Management Executive, 1988, 2, 127-132.
LUTHANS, F., ROSENKRANTZ, S. A., & HENNESSEY, H. W.What do successful managers really do? An observational study of managerial behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1985, 21, 255-270.
29.
LUTHANS, F., HODGETTS, R. M., & ROSENKRANTZ, S. A.Real managers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1988.
30.
MAHONEY, T. A., & FROST, P.The role of technology on models of organization effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 11, 127-138.
31.
MAHONEY, T. A., & WEITZEL, W.Managerial models of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1969, 14, 357-365.
32.
McAREAVY, J. F., KING, G. C., & EICHHORN, R.Army civilian executive and manager development system (Vol. I). Rock Island, Illinois: United States Army Management Engineering Training Activity, 1985.
33.
MINTZBERG, H.The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
34.
MORRISON, A. M., McCALL, M. W., Jr., & DeVRIES, D. L.Feedback to managers: A comprehensive review of twenty-four instruments. Greensboro, North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership, 1978.
35.
NICHOLAS, J. M., & KATZ, M.Research methods and reporting practices in organizational development: A review and some guidelines. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10, 737-749.
36.
NUNNALLY, J. C.Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
37.
PFEFFER, J., & SALANCIK, G. R.Determinants of supervisory behavior: A role set analysis. Human Relations, 1975, 28, 138-154.
38.
PORTER, L. W., & McKIBBIN, L. E.Management education and development. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
39.
POSNER, B. Z., & KOUZES, J. M.Development and validation of the leadership practices inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1988, 48, 483-496.
40.
QUINN, R. E., FAERMAN, S. R., THOMPSON, M. P., & McGRATH, M. R.Becoming a master manager. New York: John Wiley, 1990.
41.
SCHERMERHORN, J. R., Jr., HUNT, J. G., & OSBORN, R. N.Managing organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley, 1985.
42.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & KERR, S.Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 756-765.
43.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., & KERR, S.Theories and measures of leadership: A critical appraisal of current and future directions. In J. Hunt and L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977.
44.
SCHRIESHEIM, C. A., HOUSE, R. J., & KERR, S.Leader initiating structure: A reconciliation of discrepant research results and some empirical tests. Organizational behavior and human performance, 1976, 15, 197-321.
45.
SKINNER, B. F.Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
46.
STEERS, R. M.Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear, 1977.
47.
STEERS, R. M., & PORTER, L. W.The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 434-452.
48.
SZILAGYI, A. D., Jr., & KELLER, R. T.A comparative investigation of the Supervisory Behavior Description Questionnaire (SBDQ) and the revised Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ-Form XII). Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 4, 642-649.
49.
SZILAGYI, A. D., Jr., & WALLACE, M. J., Jr.Organizational behavior and performance (4th ed.). Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1987.
50.
TOLEMAN, E. C.Purposive behavior in animals and man. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, 1932.
51.
TUBBS, M. E.Goal setting: A meta-analytical examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 474-483.
52.
VROOM, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley, 1964.
53.
VROOM, V. H., & YETTON, P. W.Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.
54.
WEISS, H. M.Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: The role of modeling in organizational socialization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 19, 89-105.
55.
WILSON, C. L.Multi-level management surveys: Feasibility studies and initial applications. JSAS: Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 1975, 5, (Ms. no. 1137), American Psychology Association, Washington.
56.
WILSON, C. L.The Wilson multi-level management surveys: Refinement and replication of the scales. JSAS: Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 1978, 8, (Ms. no. 1707), American Psychology Association, Washington.
57.
WILSON, C. L.Identify needs with costs in mind. Training and Development Journal, 1980, 34, 58-62.
58.
WILSON, C. L.Task cycle theory: A learning-based view of organization behavior. In R. Ochsman and P. Whitney (Eds.), Psychology and productivity. New York: Plenum Books, 1989.
59.
WILSON, C. L., O'HARE, D., & SHIPPER, F.Task cycle theory: The process of influence. In K. E. Clark and M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of leadership. West Orange, New Jersey: Leadership Library of America, 1990.
60.
YUKL, G. A.Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1989.
61.
ZALEZNIK, A.The leadership gap. The Executive, 1990, 4(1), 7-22.
