How do women negotiate and express authenticity in professional contexts where their presence and identities are largely rendered (in)visible? We draw on intersectional invisibility as our conceptual lens to explore how women early career researchers subjectively negotiate authenticity given prevailing conditions of visibility, invisibility and hypervisibility at work. Based on semi-structured interviews with recipients of the Organisation for Women in Science from Developing Countries (OWSD)-Elsevier award, we illuminate how (in)visible conditions shape the subjective negotiation of authenticity, informing the agentic capacity of women researchers to express themselves authentically in professional settings. Our findings reveal the negotiation of authenticity is closely tied to gender performance in a manner that aligns with perceived professionalism. This entails compartmentalising personal values when feeling invisible, experiencing a heightened awareness of context-specific boundaries when visibility increases and enacting adaptive agency when hypervisible. We thus posit authenticity as a continuous process of ongoing identity construction and negotiation rather than a static ideal.
AckerJ (2009) From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail51(2): 199–217.
2.
ArifeenSRSyedJ (2020) The challenges of fitting in: An intersectional framing of minority ethnic women managers’ career experiences in the UK. Personnel Review49(5): 1194–1211.
3.
AtewologunD (2018) Intersectionality theory and practice. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Business and Management, 1–20. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48.
4.
Banet-WeiserS (2021) Gender, social media, and the labor of authenticity. American Quarterly73(1): 141–144.
5.
BarretoMEllemersNBanalS (2006) Working undercover: Performance-related self-confidence among members of contextually devalued groups who try to pass. European Journal of Social Psychology36(3): 337–352.
BeintemaN (2017) An assessment of the gender gap in African agricultural research capacities. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security2(1): 1–13.
8.
BellEBrymanAHarleyB (2022) Business Research Methods. Oxford: OUP.
9.
BennettDHennekamSMacarthurS, et al. (2019) Hiding gender: How women composers manage gender identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(3): 20–32.
10.
BhattacharyyaBBerdahlJL (2023) Do you see me? An inductive examination of differences between women of color’s experiences of and responses to invisibility at work. Journal of Applied Psychology108(7): 1073.
11.
BhaveDPGlombTM (2016) The role of occupational emotional labor requirements on the surface acting-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Management42(3): 722–741.
12.
BojeD (2001) Narrative Methods for Organizational & Communication Research. London: Sage.
13.
BowenGA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research8(1): 137–152.
14.
BrighentiA (2007) Visibility: A category for the social sciences. Current Sociology55(3): 323–342.
15.
BrotheridgeCMGrandeyAA (2002) Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of ‘people work’. Journal of Vocational Behavior60(1): 17–39.
16.
BuchananNTSettlesIH (2019) Managing (in)visibility and hypervisibility in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(3): 1–5.
17.
BullockCL (2019) Driving new narratives: Women-leader identities in the automotive industry. Gender in Management: An International Journal34(3): 200–216.
18.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
19.
ByrneD (2021) A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity56(2): 1391–1412.
20.
CableDMGinoFStaatsBR (2013) Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly58(1): 1–36.
21.
CanavanBMcCamleyC (2021) Negotiating authenticity: Three modernities. Annals of Tourism Research88(1): 103–185.
22.
CastroARCollinsCS (2021) Asian American women in STEM in the lab with ‘white men named John’. Science Education105(1): 33–61.
23.
ChaSEHewlinPFRobertsLM, et al. (2019) Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals13(2): 633–671.
24.
CharmazK (2008) Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyP (eds.) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: Guilford Press, 155–172.
25.
ChenS (2019) Authenticity in context: Being true to working selves. Review of General Psychology23(1): 60–72.
26.
ChenSBoucherHCTapiasMP (2006) The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin132(2): 151.
27.
ChoSCrenshawKWMcCallL (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society38(4): 785–810.
28.
ClairJABeattyJEMacleanTL (2005) Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review30(1): 78–95.
29.
ClarkeVBraunV (2013) Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist26(2): 1–13.
30.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
31.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
32.
CreswellJWPothCN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. London: Sage.
33.
DammannOFriederichsKMLebedinskiS, et al. (2021) The essence of authenticity. Frontiers in Psychology21(11): 629–654.
34.
DeciELRyanRM (2012) Self-determination theory. In: Van LangePAMKruglanskiAWHigginsTE (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. London: Sage, 416–436.
35.
DhamoonRK (2011) Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly64(1): 230–243.
36.
DickensDDWomackVYDimesT (2019) Managing hypervisibility: An exploration of theory and research on identity shifting strategies in the workplace among Black women. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(13): 153–163.
37.
DyAMMarlowSMartinL (2017) A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations70(3): 286–311.
38.
FleesonWWiltJ (2010) The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity. Journal of Personality78(4): 1353–1382.
39.
FletcherLEverlyBA (2021) Perceived lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) supportive practices and the life satisfaction of LGBT employees: The roles of disclosure, authenticity at work, and identity centrality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology94(3): 485–508.
40.
FletcherLPichlerSChandrasekaranL (2024) Songs of the self: The importance of authentic leadership and core self-evaluations for LGBT managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology39(2): 131–145.
41.
GabsterBPvan DaalenKDhattR, et al. (2020) Challenges for the women academic during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet395(10242): 1968–1970.
42.
GrandeyA (2003) When ‘the show must go on’: Surface and deep acting as predictors of emotional exhaustion and service delivery. Academy of Management Journal46(1): 86–96.
43.
GrandeyAAFiskGMMattilaAS, et al. (2005) Is ‘service with a smile’ enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes96(1): 38–55.
44.
HarrisH (2001) Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision making. Journal of Business Ethics34(3): 191–208.
45.
HarrisKL (2017) Re-situating organizational knowledge: Violence, intersectionality and the privilege of partial perspective. Human Relations70(3): 263–285.
HeinPAnsariS (2022) From sheltered to included: The emancipation of disabled workers from benevolent marginalization. Academy of Management Journal65(3): 749–783.
48.
HuangJGatesAJSinatraR, et al. (2020) Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(9): 4609–4616.
49.
HülshegerURScheweAF (2011) On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology16(3): 361–389.
50.
HungDVictor ChenDT (2007) Context–process authenticity in learning: Implications for identity enculturation and boundary crossing. Educational Technology Research and Development55(2): 147–167.
51.
IbarraH (2015) The authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review93(1–2): 53–59.
52.
JamjoomLAMillsAJ (2023) Narratives of workplace resistance: Reframing Saudi women in leadership. Human Relations76(7): 955–989.
53.
KanterR (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
54.
KeltnerDGruenfeldDHAndersonC (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review110(2): 265–284.
55.
KernisMH (2003) Author’s response: Optimal self-esteem and authenticity: Separating fantasy from reality. Psychological Inquiry14(1): 83–89.
56.
KiferYHellerDPerunovicWQE, et al. (2013) The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science24(3): 280–288.
57.
KrumlSMGeddesD (2000) Exploring the dimensions of emotional labor: The heart of Hochschild’s work. Management Communication Quarterly14(1): 8–49.
58.
LehmanDWO’ConnorKKovácsB, et al. (2019) Authenticity. Academy of Management Annals13(1): 1–42.
59.
LentonAPBruderMSlabuL, et al. (2013) How does ‘being real’ feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality81(3): 276–289.
60.
LewisPSimpsonR (eds) (2010) Revealing and Concealing Gender: Issues of Visibility in Organizations. Berlin: Springer.
61.
LewisPSimpsonR (2012) Kanter revisited: Gender, power and (in) visibility. International Journal of Management Reviews 14(2):141–158.
62.
LockeK (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.
63.
MacKinnonCA (2013) From practice to theory, or what is a white woman anyway? In:Feminist Legal Theories. London: Routledge, 191–200.
64.
MacLachlanAJ (2006) Developing Graduate Students of Color for the Professoriate in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education.
65.
MainieroLASullivanSE (2005) Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out “revolution. Academy of Management Perspectives19(1): 106–123.
66.
MarkusHWurfE (1987) The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology38: 299–337.
67.
MarlowSMcAdamM (2012) Analyzing the influence of gender upon high-technology venturing within the context of business incubation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(4): 655–676.
68.
MartinezLRSawyerKBThoroughgoodCN, et al. (2017) The importance of being “me”: The relation between authentic identity expression and transgender employees’ work-related attitudes and experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology102(2): 215.
69.
McCallL (2005) The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30(3): 1771–1800.
70.
McCluneyCLRabeloVC (2019) Conditions of visibility: An intersectional examination of Black women’s belongingness and distinctiveness at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(12): 143–152.
71.
MeisterASinclairAJehnKA (2017) Identities under scrutiny: How women leaders navigate feeling misidentified at work. The Leadership Quarterly28(5): 672–690.
72.
MénardJBrunetL (2011) Authenticity and well-being in the workplace: A mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology26(4): 331–346.
73.
MitraR (2015) Proposing a culture-centered approach to career scholarship: The example of subsistence careers in the US Arctic. Human Relations68(12): 1813–1835.
74.
MorleyL (2013) The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education25(1): 116–131.
75.
MorrisonEWMillikenFJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review25(4): 706–725.
76.
MoulardJGRaggioRDFolseJAG (2021) Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science49(1): 96–118.
77.
NazzalAStringfellowLJMacleanM (2024) Webs of oppression? An intersectional approach to feminist activism in organizing. Human Relations77(2): 265–295.
78.
NisbettREWilsonTD (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review84(3): 231.
79.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
PetersonRA (2005) In search of authenticity. Journal of Management Studies42(5): 1083–1098.
81.
Purdie-VaughnsVEibachRP (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles59(5): 377–391.
82.
Rickly-BoydJM (2013) Existential authenticity: Place matters. Tourism Geographies15(4): 680–686.
83.
RobertsLMChaSEHewlinPF, et al. (2009) Bringing the inside out: Enhancing authenticity and positive identity in organizations. In: RobertsLMDuttonJE (eds.) Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. New York: Psychology Press, 149–169.
84.
RyanWSRyanRM (2019) Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within- person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology23(1): 99–112.
85.
SarpongDMacleanM (2017) Service nepotism in cosmopolitan transient social spaces. Work, Employment and Society31(5): 764–781.
86.
SarpongDMacleanM (2021) Moving on up? Exploring the career journeys of skilled migrants in the professions. International Journal of Human Resource Management32(14): 3004–3032.
87.
SarpongDMacleanMHarveyC (2024) Relational interdependencies and the intra-EU mobility of African European citizens. Human Relations77(2): 200–232.
88.
SchlegelRJHicksJA (2011) The true self and psychological health: Emerging evidence and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass5(12): 989–1003.
89.
SchmidPF (2005) Authenticity and alienation: Towards an understanding of the person beyond the categories of order and disorder. In JosephSWorsleyR (eds) Person-centered psychopathology: A positive psychology of mental health. United Kingdom: PCCS Books, 75–90.
90.
SedikidesCSlabuLLentonA, et al. (2017) State authenticity. Current Directions in Psychological Science26(6): 521–525.
91.
SettlesIHBuchananNTDotsonK (2019) Scrutinized but not recognized: (In)visibility and hypervisibility experiences of faculty of color. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(1): 62–74.
92.
SimpsonRLewisP (2005) An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: Re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility. Human Relations58(10): 1253–1275.
93.
SmetsMJarzabkowskiPBurkeGT, et al. (2015) Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal58(3): 932–970.
94.
StrykerS (1968) Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family30(4): 558–564.
95.
SullivanSEMainieroLA (2007) The changing nature of gender roles, alpha-beta careers and work-life issues: Theory-driven implications for human resource management. Career Development International12(3): 238–263.
96.
SummervilleK (2022) The multidimensional self at work: An intersectional examination of identity conflict and authenticity among Black and White men and women. Doctoral Thesis, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC.
97.
TangYXuEHuangX, et al. (2023) When can display of authenticity at work facilitate coworker interactions? The moderating effect of perception of organizational politics. Human Relations76(1): 27–52.
98.
ThompsonAStringfellowLJMacleanM, et al. (2021) Ethical considerations and challenges for using digital ethnography to research vulnerable populations. Journal of Business Research124(2): 676–683.
99.
TuMCZhouSWongSN, et al. (2019) Realities of the American dream: Vocational experiences and intersecting invisibility of low-income Chinese immigrant laborers. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(8): 88–102.
100.
Van den BoschRTarisTW (2014) Authenticity at work: Development and validation of an individual authenticity measure at work. Journal of Happiness Studies15(1): 1–8.
101.
Van den BoschRTarisTWSchaufeliWB, et al. (2019) Authenticity at work: A matter of fit?The Journal of Psychology153(2): 247–266.
102.
Van den BrinkMBenschopY (2012) Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization19(4): 507–524.
103.
VanniniPWilliamsJP (eds.) (2009) Authenticity in Culture, Self, and Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
104.
VerlooM (2013) Intersectional and cross-movement politics and policies: Reflections on current practices and debates. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society38(4): 893–915.
105.
WassermanVFrenkelM (2020) The politics of (in)visibility displays: Ultra-orthodox women manoeuvring within and between visibility regimes. Human Relations73(12): 1609–1631.
106.
WatsonT (2017) Sociology, Work and Organisation. London: Routledge.
107.
Wilkins-YelKGHymanJZounlomeNO (2019) Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM. Journal of Vocational Behavior113(5): 51–61.
108.
WongCYKirbyTARinkF, et al. (2022) Intersectional invisibility in women’s diversity interventions. Frontiers in Psychology25(13): 791–572.
109.
WoodAMLinleyPAMaltbyJ, et al. (2008) The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counselling Psychology55(3): 385–399.
110.
YoungRACollinA (2004) Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior64(3): 373–388.
