Is “be yourself” always the best advice? We suggest that interpersonal consequences of behaving authentically depend on the extent to which individuals identify with the social environment where they behave authentically. Bridging the research on authenticity, social identity, and conflict, we propose that for high identifiers, authentic behavior reveals how similar they are to others, thereby reducing dyadic relationship conflict. When social identification is low, behaving authentically increases the salience of how different the individual is from others, increasing relationship conflict. In a multi-source time-lag sample of professional work teams (Study 1), we found that authentic behavior indeed reduced relationship conflict and enhanced task performance for high identifiers, but had an inverse, detrimental effect for low identifiers. In a sample of student teams (Study 2), we only found an attenuating effect of authentic behavior on relationship conflict for high identifiers, and no effect for low identifiers. These results suggest that the advice “to be yourself” applies in educational contexts involving younger adults, but has to be prescribed with care in professional work contexts. Our findings emphasize the importance of social context for the consequences of authentic behavior, and call for more research on the contextual effects of authenticity.
AbramsDHoggMA (2001) Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In: HoggMTindaleR (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Oxford: Blackwell, 425–460.
2.
AdkinsCLRavlinECMeglinoBM (1996) Value congruence between co-workers and its relationship to work outcomes. Group and Organization Management21(4): 439–460.
3.
AhearneMBhattacharyaCBGruenT (2005) Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: Expanding the role of relationship marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology90(3): 574–585.
4.
AikenLSWestSG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
5.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
6.
AronAAronENSmollanD (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4): 596–612.
7.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
8.
AshforthBESchinoffBS (2016) Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3: 111–137.
9.
AshtonMCLeeK (2016) Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports. Journal of Research in Personality64: 102–111.
10.
AvolioBJGardnerWL (2005) Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly16(3): 315–338.
11.
BakerZGTouRYBryanJL, et al (2017) Authenticity and well-being: Exploring positivity and negativity in interactions as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences113: 235–239.
12.
BartelCA (2001) Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly46(3): 379–413.
13.
BeckerTE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods8(3): 274–289.
14.
BednarJSGalvinBMAshforthBE, et al (2020) Putting identification in motion: A dynamic view of organizational identification. Organization Science31(1): 200–222.
15.
BergamiMBagozziRP (2000) Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology39(4): 555–577.
16.
BrewerMB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17(5): 475–482.
17.
ByrneDE (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
18.
CableDMGinoFStaatsBR (2013) Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly58(1): 1–36.
19.
CameronACMillerDL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources50(2): 317–372.
20.
CameronJE (2004) A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity3: 239–262.
21.
CarsonJTeslukPMarroneJ (2007) Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal50: 1217–1234.
22.
CazaBBMossSVoughH (2018) From synchronizing to harmonizing: The process of authenticating multiple work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly63(4): 703–745.
23.
ChaSHewlinPFRobertsLM, et al (2019) Being your true self at work: Integrating the fragmented research on authenticity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals13(2): 633–671.
ChenS (2019) Authenticity in context: Being true to working selves. Review of General Psychology23(1): 60–72.
26.
CostaPTMcCraeRR (1992) Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment4(1): 5–13.
27.
CostaPTJrMcCraeRRLöckenhoffCE (2019) Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology70: 423–448.
28.
De DreuCWeingartL (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 741–749.
29.
De WitFRGreerLLJehnKA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology97(2): 360–390.
30.
DeciELRyanRM (1995) Human agency: The basis for true self-esteem. In: KernisM (ed.) Efficacy, Agency, and Self-esteem. New York: Plenum, 31–50.
31.
DeciELRyanRM (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227–268.
32.
DukerichJMGoldenBRShortellSM (2002) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly47(3): 507–533.
33.
EndlerNSMagnussonD (1976) Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin83(5): 956–974.
34.
EricksonRJ (1995) The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction18: 121–144.
35.
EricksonRJWhartonAS (1997) Inauthenticity and depression: Assessing the consequences of interactive service work. Work and Occupations24(2): 188–213.
36.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
FiskeSTCuddyAJGlickP (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences11(2): 77–83.
38.
GardnerWLCogliserCCDavisKM, et al (2011) Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly22(6): 1120–1145.
39.
GecasVBurkePJ (1995) Self and identity. In: CookKSFineGAHouseJS (eds) Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 41–67.
40.
GinoF (2018) Rebel Talent: Why it Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life. Newyork, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
41.
GoldbergL (1999) A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several 5-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe7: 7–28.
42.
GoldmanBMKernisMH (2002) The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association5(6): 18–20.
GuillénLMayoMKarelaiaN (2018) Appearing self-confident and getting credit for it: Why it may be easier for men than women to gain influence at work. Human Resource Management57(4): 839–854.
45.
HarterS (2002) Authenticity. In: SnyderCRLopezSJ (eds) Handbook of Positive Psychology. London: Oxford University Press, 382–394.
46.
HaslamSA (2004) Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. London: SAGE.
47.
HayesAF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A regression-based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
48.
HeereBJamesJD (2007) Stepping outside the lines: Developing a multi dimensional team identity scale based on social identity theory. Sport Management Review10: 65–91.
49.
HewlinPF (2009) Wearing the cloak: Antecedents and consequences of creating facades of conformity. Journal of Applied Psychology94(3): 727–741.
50.
HewlinPFDumasTLBurnettMF (2017) To thine own self be true? Facades of conformity, values incongruence, and the moderating impact of leader integrity. Academy of Management Journal60(1): 178–199.
51.
HicksJASchlegelRJNewmanGE (2019) Introduction to the special issue: Authenticity: Novel insights into a valued, yet elusive, concept. Review of General Psychology23(1): 3–7.
52.
HigginsET (1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review94(3): 319–340.
53.
HigginsET (1989) Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer?Advances in Experimental Social Psychology22: 93–136.
54.
HoggMA (2001) Social categorization, depersonalization, and group behavior. In: HoggMATindaleRS (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, Vol. 4. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 56–85.
55.
HoggMATerryDJ (2001) Social identity theory and organizational processes. In: HoggMATerryDJ (eds) Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 1–12.
56.
HornseyMJ (2008) Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2: 204–222.
57.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6: 1–55.
58.
IbarraH (2015) The authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review93(1/2): 52–59.
59.
JehnKA (1994) Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management5(3): 223–238.
60.
JehnKA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly40(2): 256–282.
61.
JehnKAMannixEA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal44: 238–251.
62.
JehnKANorthcraftGBNealeMA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly44(4): 741–763.
63.
JehnKARispensSThatcherSMB (2010) The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal53: 596–616.
64.
JonesEENisbettRE (1972) The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions in the causes of behavior. In: JonesEEKanouseDEKelleyHH, et al. (eds) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning, 79–94.
65.
JudgeTAZapataCP (2015) The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal58(4): 1149–1179.
66.
JudgeTAThoresenCJBonoJE, et al (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin127(3): 376–407.
67.
JudgeTABonoJEIliesR, et al (2002) Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 765–780.
68.
KarelaiaNGuillénL (2014) Me, a woman and a leader: Positive social identity and identity conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes125: 204–219.
69.
KernisMH (2003) Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry14(1): 1–26.
70.
KernisMHGoldmanBM (2006) A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology38: 283–357.
71.
KiferYHellerDPerunovicWQE, et al (2013) The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science24(3): 280–288.
72.
KleinKJKozlowskiSW (2000) From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods3(3): 211–236.
73.
KnollMVan DickR (2013) Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification. The Journal of Positive Psychology8: 346–360.
74.
Kristof-BrownALStevensCK (2001) Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter?Journal of Applied Psychology86(6): 1083–1095.
75.
Kristof-BrownALZimmermanRDJohnsonEC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology58(2): 281–342.
76.
LarrickRP (2016) The social context of decisions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior3: 441–467.
77.
LehmanDWO’ConnorKKovacsB, et al (2019) Authenticity. Academy of Management Annals13(1): 1–42.
78.
LentonAPSlabuLSedikidesC (2016) State authenticity in everyday life. European Journal of Personality30: 64–82.
79.
LeroyHAnseelFDimitrovaNG, et al (2013) Mindfulness, authentic functioning, and work engagement: A growth modeling approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior82(3): 238–247.
80.
LeroyHHoeverIJVangronsveltK, et al (2021) How team averages in authentic living and perspective-taking personalities relate to team information elaboration and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology106(3): 364–376.
MénardJBrunetL (2011) Authenticity and well-being in the workplace: A mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology26(4): 331–346.
83.
MilfontTLMilojevPSibleyCG (2016) Values stability and change in adulthood: A 3-year longitudinal study of rank-order stability and mean-level differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(5): 572–588.
84.
MiočevićMO’RourkeHPMacKinnonDP, et al (2018) Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models. Behavior Research Methods50(1): 285–301.
85.
MischelW (1977) The interaction of person and situation. In: MagnussonDEndlerNS (eds) Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 333–352.
86.
MonzaniLKnollMGiessnerS, et al (2019) Between a rock and hard place: Combined effects of authentic leadership, organizational identification, and team prototypicality on managerial prohibitive voice. The Spanish Journal of Psychology22: E2.
87.
MorrisonEWMillikenFJ (2000) Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review25: 706–731.
88.
MotowidloSVan ScotterJ (1994) Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology79: 475–480.
OrganDWLinglA (1995) Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Social Psychology135: 339–350.
93.
PaulhusDL (1986) Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In: AngleitnerAWigginsJS (eds) Personality Assessment Via Questionnaires. New York: Springer-Verlag, 143–165.
94.
PelledLH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science7: 615–631.
95.
PfefferJ (2015) Leadership BS: Fixing Workplaces and Careers One Truth at a Time. New York: HarperCollins.
96.
PhillipsKWRothbardNPDumasTL (2009) To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Academy of Management Review34(4): 710–732.
97.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
98.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
99.
PostmesTHaslamSAJansL (2013) A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology52(4): 597–617.
ReysenSKatzarska-MillerINesbitSM, et al (2013) Further validation of a single-item measure of social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology43(6): 463–470.
104.
RichBLLepineJACrawfordER (2010) Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal53(3): 617–635.
105.
RikettaM (2005) Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior66(2): 358–384.
106.
RikettaMVan DickR (2005) Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior67(3): 490–510.
107.
RiveraGNChristyAGKimJ, et al (2019) Understanding the relationship between perceived authenticity and well-being. Review of General Psychology23(1): 113–126.
108.
RobertsLMChaSEHewlinPF, et al (2009) Bringing the inside out: Enhancing authenticity and positive identity in organizations. In: RobertsLMDuttonJE (eds) Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations. New York: Routledge, 149–169.
109.
RogersCR (1964) Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology68: 160–167.
110.
RosenthalLLondonBLevySR, et al (2011) The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles65(9–10): 725–736.
111.
RossRS (1989) Conflict. In: RossRSRossJ (eds) Small Groups in Organizational Settings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 139–178.
112.
SagivLRoccasSCieciuchJ, et al (2017) Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour1(9): 630–639.
113.
SchaubroeckJLamSS (2002) How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1120–1136.
114.
ScheinEH (2004) Organization Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
115.
SchmaderTSedikidesC (2018) State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review22(3): 228–259.
116.
SchmittMTBranscombeNRPostmesT, et al (2014) The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin140(4): 921–948.
117.
SchneiderBSmithDBGoldsteinHW (2000) Attraction–selection–attrition: Toward a person–environment psychology of organizations. In: WalshWBCraikKHPriceRH (eds) Person–Environment Psychology: New Directions and Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 61–85.
118.
SedikidesCSlabuLLentonA, et al (2017) State authenticity. Current Directions in Psychological Science26(6): 521–525.
119.
ShahPPPetersonRSJonesSL, et al (2021) Things are not always what they seem: The origins and evolution of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly66(2): 426–474.
120.
SheldonKMRyanRMRawsthorneLJ, et al (1997) Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73(6): 1380–1393.
121.
ShemlaMMeyerBGreerL, et al (2016) A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes?Journal of Organizational Behavior37: S89–S106.
122.
SmallenbroekOZelenskiJMWhelanDC (2017) Authenticity as a eudaimonic construct: The relationships among authenticity, values, and valence. Journal of Positive Psychology2: 197–209.
123.
SnyderMIckesW (1985) Personality and social behavior. In: LindzeyGAronsonE (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (3rd edn). New York: Random House, 883–947.
124.
StrykerSBurkePJ (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly64: 284–297.
125.
SulsJMartinRDavidJP (1998) Person-environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neuroticism, and emotional reactivity to interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(1): 88–98.
126.
TajfelH (1978) Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In: TajfelH (ed.) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 61–76.
127.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorschelSAustinWG (eds) The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
TroppLRWrightSC (2001) Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 585–600.
130.
TurnerJC (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: TajfelH (ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–40.
131.
TurnerJCHoggMAOakesPJ, et al (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
132.
van den BoschRTarisTW (2014) The authentic worker’s well-being and performance: The relationship between authenticity at work, well-being, and work outcomes. The Journal of Psychology148(6): 659–681.
133.
Van DickRWagnerU (2002) Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology11: 129–149.
134.
Van KnippenbergD (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology49(3): 357–371.
135.
Van KnippenbergDHoggMA (2003) A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior25: 243–295.
136.
VogelRMRodellJBLynchJW (2016) Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal59(5): 1561–1584.
137.
WickhamREWilliamsonREBeardCL, et al (2016) Authenticity attenuates the negative effects of interpersonal conflict on daily well-being. Journal of Research in Personality60: 56–62.
138.
WitheyMJGellatlyIRAnnettM (2005) The moderating effect of situation strength on the relationship between personality and provision of effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology35(8): 1587–1608.
139.
WoodAMLinelyPAMaltbyJ, et al (2008) The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology55(3): 385–399.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
