Despite growing attention for how disabled people become Othered in organizational settings and similar scholarly interest in the treatment of non-humans at work, no analysis so far has focused on the potential double marginalization that takes place when disabled people go to work with their service animal. In filling this void, this study draws attention to the embodied entanglement of ‘humanimal’ in a number of organizations where animals are unexpected. The study argues that the spatial, discursive and affective treatment of service dogs operates as a proxy for the in/exclusion of employees with mobility and visual impairments. This way, processes of ableism become masked as subtle and indirect performances towards non-human Others. Contributions are made towards several literatures by introducing the idea of a ‘proxy’ to help understand the different modes of peripheral inclusion of disabled employees via their legally accepted service animals, by bringing in the role of affect in workplace disablement, and finally by taking animal labour more seriously.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2007) Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1265–1281.
2.
AshcraftKLMuhrSLRennstamJ, et al (2012) Professionalization as a branding activity: Occupational identity and the dialectic of inclusivity–exclusivity. Gender, Work and Organization19(5): 467–488.
3.
BaldridgeDCKulkarniM (2017) The shaping of sustainable careers post hearing loss: Toward greater understanding of adult onset disability, disability identity, and career transitions. Human Relations70(10): 1217–1236.
4.
BaldridgeDCSwiftML (2016) Age and assessments of disability accommodation request normative appropriateness. Human Resource Management55(3): 385–400.
5.
BarnesC (2004) Reflections on doing emancipatory disability research. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesC, et al (eds) Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments. London: SAGE, 48–53.
6.
BeattyJEBaldridgeDCBoehmSA, et al (2019) On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management58(2): 119–137.
CampbellFA (2001) Inciting legal fictions: Disability’s date with ontology and the ableist body of the law. Griffith Law Review10(1): 42–62.
9.
CampbellF (2009) Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
CharlesNWolkowitzC (2019) Bringing dogs onto campus: Inclusions and exclusions of animal bodies in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 303–321.
11.
ClarkeCKnightsD (2018) Practice makes perfect? Skillful performances in veterinary work. Human Relations71(10): 1395–1421.
12.
ClarkeCKnightsD (2021) Milking it for all it’s worth: Unpalatable practices, dairy cows and veterinary work?Journal of Business Ethics. Epub ahead of print 11 January 2021. DOI: 10.1007/S10551-020-04666-3.
13.
ColarelliSMMcDonaldAMChristensenMS, et al (2017) A companion dog increases prosocial behavior in work groups. Anthrozoös30(1): 77–89.
14.
ConnollyLCullenJG (2018) Animals and organisations: An ethic of care framework. Organization & Environment31(4): 406–424.
15.
CoulterK (2017) Humane jobs: A political economic vision for interspecies solidarity and human–animal wellbeing. Politics and Animals3: 31–41.
16.
CoulterKFitzgeraldA (2019) The compounding feminization of animal cruelty investigation work and its multispecies implications. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 288–302.
17.
CudworthE (2014) Beyond speciesism: Intersectionality, critical sociology and the human domination of other animals. In: TaylorNTwineR (eds) The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. London and New York: Routledge, 19–35.
18.
CunhaMPERegoAMunroI (2019) Dogs in organizations. Human Relations72(4): 778–800.
19.
DaleK (2005) Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization12(5): 649–678.
20.
DanieliAWoodhamsC (2005) Emancipatory research methodology and disability: A critique. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(4): 281–296.
21.
DashperK (2020) More-than-human emotions: Multispecies emotional labour in the tourism industry. Gender, Work & Organization27(1): 24–40.
22.
De SmetRPendersISourbronM, et al (2020) Trendrapport 2020: Kwetsbare groepen op de Vlaamse arbeidsmarkt. Brussel/Leuven: Departement Werk en Sociale Economie/Steunpunt Werk.
23.
DobuschL (2017) Gender, dis-/ability and diversity management: Unequal dynamics of inclusion?Gender, Work & Organization24(5): 487–505.
24.
ElrazH (2018) Identity, mental health and work: How employees with mental health conditions recount stigma and the pejorative discourse of mental illness. Human Relations71(5): 722–741.
25.
ElyRJThomasDA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly46(2): 229–273.
26.
FevreRRobinsonALewisD, et al (2013) The ill-treatment of employees with disabilities in British workplaces. Work, Employment and Society27(2): 288–307.
27.
FinkelRDanbyP (2019) Legitimizing leisure experiences as emotional work: A post-humanist approach to gendered equine encounters. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 377–391.
28.
FosterDWassV (2013) Disability in the labour market: An exploration of concepts of the ideal worker and organisational fit that disadvantage employees with impairments. Sociology47(4): 705–721.
29.
FotakiMKennyKVachhaniSJ (2017) Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters. Organization24(1): 3–17.
30.
GeigerBBVan Der WelKATøgeAG (2017) Success and failure in narrowing the disability employment gap: Comparing levels and trends across Europe 2002–2014. BMC Public Health17(1): 928.
31.
GoodleyD (2014) Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
32.
GoodleyDRunswick-ColeK (2011) The violence of disablism. Sociology of Health & Illness33(4): 602–617.
33.
GoodleyDLiddiardKRunswick-ColeK (2018) Feeling disability: Theories of affect and critical disability studies. Disability & Society33(2): 197–217.
34.
HallSWrightHMcCuneS, et al (2017) Perceptions of dogs in the workplace: The pros and the cons. Anthrozoös30(2): 291–305.
35.
HamiltonLMcCabeD (2016) ‘It’s just a job’: Understanding emotion work, de-animalization and the compartmentalization of organized animal slaughter. Organization23(3): 330–350.
36.
HamiltonLTaylorN (2012) Ethnography in evolution: Adapting to the animal ‘other’ in organizations. Journal of Organizational Ethnography1(1): 43–51.
37.
HamiltonLTaylorN (2013) Animals at Work: Identity, Politics and Culture in Work with Animals. Boston: Brill Academic Press.
38.
HamiltonLTaylorN (2017) Ethnography after Humanism: Power, Politics and Method in Multi-Species Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
HarawayDJ (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
40.
HarlanSLRobertPM (1998) The social construction of disability in organizations: Why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work and Occupations25(4): 397–435.
HunterCVerreynneMLPachanaN, et al (2019) The impact of disability-assistance animals on the psychological health of workplaces: A systematic review. Human Resource Management Review29(3): 400–417.
44.
HuopalainenA (2020) Writing with the bitches. Organization. Epub ahead of print 13 October 2020. DOI: 1350508420961533.
45.
JammaersEWilliamsJ (2020) Care for the self, overcompensation and bodily crafting: The work–life balance of disabled people. Gender, Work & Organization28(1): 119–137.
46.
JammaersEZanoniP (2021) The identity regulation of disabled employees: Unveiling the ‘varieties of ableism’ in employers’ socio-ideological control. Organization Studies42(3): 429–452.
47.
JammaersEZanoniPHardonkS (2016) Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations69(6): 1365–1386.
48.
JammaersEZanoniPWilliamsJ (2019) Not all fish are equal: A Bourdieuan analysis of ableism in a financial services company. International Journal of Human Resource Management32(11): 2519–2544.
49.
JanssensMSteyaertC (2019) A practice-based theory of diversity: Respecifying (in) equality in organizations. Academy of Management Review44(3): 518–537.
50.
JanssensMZanoniP (2005) Many diversities for many services: Theorizing diversity (management) in service companies. Human Relations58(3): 311–340.
51.
JanssensMZanoniP (2021) Making diversity research matter for social change: New conversations beyond the firm. Organization Theory2(2): 1–21.
52.
JegatheesanB (2012) Using an adaptive methodology to study human–animal interactions in cultural context. Anthrozoös25(1): 107–121.
53.
KitchinR (1998) ‘Out of place’, ‘knowing one’s place’: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society13(3): 343–356.
54.
KnightCSangK (2020) ‘At home, he’s a pet, at work he’s a colleague and my right arm’: Police dogs and the emerging posthumanist agenda. Culture and Organization26(5–6): 355–371.
55.
KonradAMMooreMENgES, et al (2013) Temporary work, underemployment and workplace accommodations: Relationship to well-being for workers with disabilities. British Journal of Management24(3): 367–382.
56.
KruseDSchurLRogersS, et al (2018) Why do workers with disabilities earn less? Occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. British Journal of Industrial Relations56(4): 798–834.
57.
KulkarniK (2019) Holding on to let go: Identity work in discontinuous and involuntary career transitions. Human Relations73(10): 1415–1438.
58.
LabatutJMunroIDesmondJ (2016) Animals and organizations. Organization23(3): 315–329.
59.
Lengnick-HallMLGauntPMKulkarniM (2008) Overlooked and underutilized: People with disabilities are an untapped human resource. Human Resource Management47(2): 255–273.
60.
LinacreS (2016) Pets in the workplace: A shaggy dog story?Human Resource Management International Digest24(4): 17–19.
61.
LintonS (1998) Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: NYU Press.
62.
LiuH (2021) Workplace injury and the failing academic body: A testimony of pain. Journal of Business Ethics. Epub ahead of print 19 May 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04838-9.
63.
MaGCFordJLucasL, et al (2020) ‘They reckon they’re man’s best friend and I believe that’: Understanding relationships with dogs in Australian Aboriginal communities to inform effective dog population management. Animals10(5): 810. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/5/810#cite.
64.
McLaughlinMEBellMPStringerDY (2004) Stigma and acceptance of persons with disabilities: Understudied aspects of workforce diversity. Group & Organization Management29(3): 302–333.
Mik-MeyerN (2016) Othering, ableism and disability: A discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Human Relations69(6): 1341–1363.
67.
O’DohertyDP (2016) Feline politics in organization: The nine lives of Olly the cat. Organization23(3): 407–433.
68.
PagánR (2012) Transitions to part-time work at older ages: The case of people with disabilities in Europe. Disability & Society27(1): 95–115.
69.
PhillipsM (2014) Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work & Organization21(5): 443–458.
70.
PullenARhodesC (2015) Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization22(2): 159–165.
71.
ReeveD (2002) Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society17(5): 493–508.
72.
ReeveD (2006) Towards a psychology of disability: The emotional effects of living in a disabling society. In: GoodleyDLawthomR (eds) Disability and Psychology: Critical Introductions and Reflections. London: Palgrave, 94–107.
73.
RennstamJSullivanKR (2018) Peripheral inclusion through informal silencing and voice: A study of LGB officers in the Swedish police. Gender, Work & Organization25(2): 177–194.
74.
SamoyEWaterplasL (2012) Designing wage subsidies for people with disabilities, as exemplified by the case of Flanders (Belgium)Alter6(2): 94–109.
75.
SangKJRichardsJMarksA (2016) Gender and disability in male-dominated occupations: A social relational model. Gender, Work & Organization23(6): 566–581.
76.
SatamaSHuopalainenA (2019) ‘Please tell me when you are in pain’: A heartbreaking story of care, grief and female–canine companionship. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 358–376.
77.
SayersJ (2016) A report to an academy: On carnophallogocentrism, pigs and meat-writing. Organization23(3): 370–386.
78.
SayersJHamiltonLSangK (2019) Organizing animals: Species, gender and power at work. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 239–245.
79.
ScholzFIngoldJ (2021) Activating the ‘ideal jobseeker’: Experiences of individuals with mental health conditions on the UK Work Programme. Human Relations74(10): 1604–1627.
80.
SchurLKruseDBlasiJ, et al (2009) Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society48(3): 381–410.
81.
SekaranUBougieR (2016) Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester.
82.
ShantzAWangJMalikA (2018) Disability status, individual variable pay, and pay satisfaction: Does relational and institutional trust make a difference?Human Resource Management57(1): 365–380.
83.
SkoglundARedmalmD (2017) ‘Doggy-biopolitics’: Governing via the first dog. Organization24(2): 240–266.
84.
SmallML (2009) ‘How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography10(1): 5–38.
85.
StoneDLColellaA (1996) A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review21(2): 352–401.
86.
TaylorNFraserH (2019) Resisting sexism and speciesism in the social sciences: Using feminist, species-inclusive, visual methods to value the work of women and (other) animals. Gender, Work & Organization26(3): 343–357.
87.
TaylorNTwineR (2014) The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. Routledge: London and New York.
88.
Van LaerKJanssensM (2011) Ethnic minority professionals’ experiences with subtle discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations64(9): 1203–1227.
89.
Van LaerKJammaersEHoevenW (2020) Disabling organizational spaces: Exploring the processes through which spatial environments disable employees with impairments. Organization. Epub ahead of print 2 January 2020. DOI: 1350508419894698.
90.
WatermeyerB (2013) Towards a Contextual Psychology of Disablism. Routledge.London and New York: Routledge.
91.
WelsH (2020) Multi-species ethnography: Methodological training in the field in South Africa. Journal of Organizational Ethnography9(3): 343–363.
92.
WilliamsJMavinS (2012) Disability as constructed difference: A literature review and research agenda for management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews14(2): 159–179.
