A growing number of studies emphasize the working alliance between the client and the coach to be a key factor in coaching. Synthesizing 27 samples (N = 3563 coaching processes), this meta-analysis sheds light on the relationship between working alliance and a broad range of coaching outcomes for clients. The meta-analytic results indicate a moderate and consistent overall relationship between a high-quality working alliance and coaching outcomes for clients (r = .41, 95% CI [.34, .48], p < .001). Working alliance was positively related to all desirable coaching outcomes (range: r = .32 to .64), with the strongest relationship to affective and cognitive coaching outcomes. Moreover, working alliance was negatively related to unintended negative effects of coaching (r = –.29). Results revealed no differences regarding the type of clients, coaches’ expertise, number of coaching sessions, and clients’ or coaches’ perspectives. Similar to other helping relationships like psychotherapy or mentoring, the results support the importance of a high-quality working alliance in coaching.
AlligerGMJanakEA (1989) Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology42(2): 331–342.
2.
AlligerGMTannenbaumSIBennettWJr, et al. (1997) A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology50(2): 341–358.
3.
AlveySBarclayK (2007) The characteristica of dyadic trust in executive coaching. Journal of Leadership Studies1(1): 18–27.
4.
BaronLMorinL (2009) The coach–coachee relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly20(1): 85–106.
5.
BaronLMorinLMorinD (2011) Executive coaching: The effect of working alliance discrepancy on the development of coachees’ self-efficacy. Journal of Management Development30(9): 847–864.
6.
BeinickeASchubertLPutzD (2017) Spotlight on coaching: A perspective of clients and coaches. Unpublished raw data, Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg,Germany.
7.
BerryRM (2005) A comparison of face-to-face and distance coaching practices: The role of the working alliance in problem resolution. Doctoral thesis, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
8.
BerryRMAshbyJSGnilkaPBMathenyKB (2011) A comparison of face-to-face and distance coaching practices: Coaches’ perceptions of the role of the working alliance in problem resolution. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research63(4): 243–253.
9.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
10.
BluckertP (2005) Critical factors in executive coaching – the coaching relationship. Industrial and Commercial Training37(7): 336–340.
11.
BordinES (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice16(3): 252–260.
12.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPTRothsteinHR (2009) Introduction to Meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
13.
BorensteinMHedgesLVHigginsJPTRothsteinHR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods1(2): 97–111.
BoyceLAJacksonRJNealLJ (2010) Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. Journal of Management Development29(10): 914–931.
16.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
17.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
18.
De HaanEDuckworthABirchDJonesC (2013) Executive coaching outcome research: The contribution of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research65(1): 40–57.
19.
De HaanEGrantAMBurgerYErikssonP-O (2016) A large-scale study of executive and workplace coaching: The relative contributions of relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research68(3): 189–207.
20.
DingmanME (2004) The effects of executive coaching on job-related attitudes. Doctoral thesis, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.
21.
DuvalSTweedieR (2000) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics56(2): 455–463.
22.
EbyLTMcManusSE (2004) The protégé’s role in negative mentoring experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior65(2): 255–275.
23.
EbyLTAllenTDHoffmanBJ, et al. (2013) An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin139(2): 441–476.
24.
GanGCChongCW (2015) Coaching relationship in executive coaching: A Malaysian study. Journal of Management Development34(4): 476–493.
25.
GessnitzerSKauffeldS (2015) The working alliance in coaching: Why behavior is the key to success. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science51(2): 177–197.
26.
GhodsN (2009) Distance coaching: The relationship between the coach–client relationship,client satisfaction, and coaching outcomes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.
27.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1995) Relationship based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
28.
GrantAM (2005) What is evidence-based executive, workplace, and life coaching? In: CavanaghMGrantAMKempT (eds) Evidence-based Coaching, Vol. 1: Theory, Research and Practice from the Behavioural Sciences. Bowen Hills, Queensland: Australian Academic Press, 1–12.
29.
GrantAM (2014) Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: Which best predicts coaching success?Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice7(1): 18–38.
30.
GrantAMCavanaghMJ (2004) Toward a profession of coaching: Sixty-five years of progress and challenges for the future. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring2(1): 1–16.
31.
GrantAMStoberDR (2006) Introduction. In: StoberDRGrantAM (eds) Evidence Based Coaching Handbook: Putting Best Practices to Work for Your Clients. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 1–14.
32.
GraßmannCSchermulyCC (2016) Side effects of business coaching and their predictors from the coachees’ perspective. Journal of Personnel Psychology15(4): 152–163.
33.
GraßmannCSchermulyCC (2018) The role of neuroticism and supervision in the relationship between negative effects for clients and novice coaches. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice11(1): 74–88.
34.
GraßmannCSchermulyCCRogenhoferA (2018a) Unpublished raw data. SRH University Berlin, Germany.
35.
GraßmannCSchermulyCCWachD (2018b) Potential antecedents and consequences of negative effect for coaches. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. Epub ahead of print 19 June 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2018.1489870.
36.
GregoryJBLevyPE (2010) Employee coaching relationships: Enhancing construct clarity and measurement. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice3(2): 109–123.
37.
GreifS (2016) Researching outcomes of coaching. In: BachkirovaTSpenceGDrakeD (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Coaching. London: SAGE, 569–588.
38.
HedgesLOlkinI (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
HopewellSClarkeMMallettS (2006) Grey literature and systematic reviews. In: RothsteinHSuttonAJBorensteinM (eds) Publication Bias in Meta-analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 49–72.
40.
HorvathAOBediRP (2002) The alliance. In: NorcrossJC (ed.) Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 37–69.
41.
HorvathAOGreenbergLS (1989) Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology36(2): 223–233.
42.
HorvathAODel ReACFlückigerCSymondsD (2011) Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy48(1): 9–16.
43.
HunterJESchmidtFL (1990) Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
44.
IaniroPMKauffeldS (2014) Take care what you bring with you: How coaches’ mood and interpersonal behavior affect coaching success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research66(3): 231–257.
45.
IaniroPMSchermulyCCKauffeldS (2013) Why interpersonal dominance and affiliation matter: An interaction analysis of the coach-client relationship. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice6(1): 25–46.
46.
IaniroPMLehmann-WillenbrockNKauffeldS (2015) Coaches and clients in action: A sequential analysis of interpersonal coach and client behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology30(3): 435–456.
JansenAMäthnerEBachmannT (2004) Erfolgreiches Coaching: Wirkfaktoren im Einzel-Coaching [Successful coaching: Effect research in coaching]. Kröning, Germany: Asanger.
50.
JonesRJWoodsSAGuillaumeYRF (2015) The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta-analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology89(2): 249–277.
51.
KilburgRR (1996) Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research48(2): 134–144.
52.
KilburgRR (2002) Failure and negative outcomes: The taboo topic in executive coaching. In: FitzgeraldCBergerJG (eds) Executive Coaching: Practices and Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Davis-Black, 283–301.
53.
KirkpatrickDL (1967) Evaluation of training. In: CraigRLBittelLR (eds) Training and Development Handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 87–112.
54.
KivlighanDMHillCEGelsoCJBaumannE (2016) Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model. Journal of Counseling Psychology63(2): 149–161.
55.
KivlighanDMKlineKGelsoCJHillCE (2017) Congruence and discrepancy between working alliance and real relationship: Variance decomposition and response surface analyses. Journal of Counseling Psychology64(4): 394–409.
56.
KokotovicAMTraceyTJ (1990) Working alliance in the early phase of counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology37(1): 16–21.
57.
KraigerKFordJKSalasE (1993) Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 311–328.
58.
KretzschmarI (2010) Exploring clients’ readiness for coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring (Special Issue 4): 1–20.
59.
LawleyJLinder-PelzS (2016) Evidence of competency: Exploring coach, coachee and expert evaluations of coaching. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice9(2): 110–128.
60.
McCarthyGMilnerJ (2013) Managerial coaching: Challenges, opportunities and training. Journal of Management Development32(7): 768–779.
61.
MarmaroshCLKivlighanDMJr (2012) Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology59(3): 352–367.
62.
MartinDJGarskeJPDavisMK (2000) Relationship of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology68(3): 438–450.
63.
MaurerI (2009) Führungskräftecoaching: Eine Studie zur Wirksamkeit von prozessorientierten Interventionstechniken bei der Problemklärung [Executive coaching: A study on the efficacy of process-oriented intervention techniques for problem resolution]. Baden-Baden, Germany: Tectum.
64.
NichollsAR (2017) Psychology in Sports Coaching: Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
65.
O’BroinAOPalmerS (2006) The coach-client relationship and contributions made by the coach in improving coaching outcome. The Coaching Psychologist2(2): 16–20.
66.
O’BroinAOPalmerS (2007) Reappraising the coach-client relationship: The unassuming change agent in coaching. In: PalmerSWhybrowA (eds) Handbook of Coaching Psychology: A Guide for Practitioners. Hove: Routledge, 295–324.
67.
PassmoreJFillery-TravisA (2011) A critical review of executive coaching research: A decade of progress and what’s to come. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice4(2): 70–88.
68.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
69.
PutzDBerostL (2017) Unpublished raw data. Rheinische Fachhochschule Köln, Germany.
70.
Ramos-SánchezLEsnilEGoodwinA, et al. (2002) Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice33(2): 197–202.
71.
RogersDT (2015) Further validation of the learning alliance inventory: The roles of working alliance, rapport, and immediacy in student learning. Teaching of Psychology42(1): 19–25.
72.
RosenzweigS (1936) Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry6(3): 412–415.
73.
SchermulyCC (2018) Client dropout from business coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research70(3): 250–267.
74.
SchermulyCCGraßmannC (2018) A literature review on negative effects of coaching: What we know and what we need to know. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. Epub ahead of print 3 October 2018, https://doi:10.1080/17521882.2018.1528621.
75.
SchermulyCCMeyerB (2015) Good relationships at work: The effects of Leader–Member Exchange and Team–Member Exchange on psychological empowerment, emotional exhaustion, and depression. Journal of Organizational Behavior37(5): 673–691.
76.
SchermulyCCSchermuly-HauptM-LSchölmerichFRauterbergH (2014) Zu Risiken und Nebenwirkungen lesen Sie … Negative Effekte von Coaching [For risks and side effects read … Negative effects of coaching]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie58(1): 17–33.
77.
SoneshSCCoultasCWLacerenzaCN, et al. (2015a) The power of coaching: A meta-analytic investigation. Coaching:An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice8(2): 73–95.
78.
SoneshSCCoultasCWMarlowSL, et al. (2015b) Coaching in the wild: Identifying factors that lead to success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research67(3): 189–217.
79.
SpenceGB (2007) GAS powered coaching: Goal attainment scaling and its use in coaching research and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review2(2): 155–167.
80.
TheeboomTBeersmaBVan VianenAEM (2014) Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology9(1): 1–18.
81.
WasylyshynKM (2003) Executive coaching: An outcome study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research55(2): 94–106.
82.
WebersG (2008) Die Untersuchung der Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen, Selbststeuerungs-kompetenzen und Selbstreflexion im Kontext eines Coachings zum Thema Procrastination. Unpublished diploma thesis, Universität Osnabrück, Germany.
83.
WillTGessnitzerSKauffeldS (2016) You think you are an empathic coach? Maybe you should think again. The difference between perceptions of empathy vs. empathic behaviour after a person-centred coaching training. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice9(1): 53–68.
84.
Zilcha-ManoSErrázurizP (2015) One size does not fit all: Examining heterogeneity and identifying moderators of the alliance–outcome association. Journal of Counseling Psychology62(4): 579–591.
85.
Zilcha-ManoSSolomonovNChuiH, et al. (2015) Therapist-reported alliance: Is it really a predictor of outcome?Journal of Counseling Psychology62(4): 568–578.
