The increased reliance on interorganizational collaborations (ICs) has created new challenges for leaders. They must attempt to apply leadership theories and behaviors developed primarily for leading within one organization or group to leading collaborations of multiple organizations and stakeholders. To provide insight into this issue, this study examines leadership behavior in an IC developing a strategic plan to promote changes to address public health and safety concerns related to substance abuse. Combining observations and interviews, we followed a statewide interagency taskforce in a southwestern state of the United States from its inception through completion of its strategic plan within a 10-month deadline. Findings show different leadership behaviors were integrated and evolved over time to strike a balance between decision-making effectiveness and efficiency. In particular, the findings support recent research on examining leadership behavior holistically to develop a ‘fuller full-range’ leadership perspective (Antonakis and House, 2014), especially in terms of how collectivistic and instrumental leadership should complement transformational leadership, and by demonstrating that the combinations of leadership change over time and occur at multiple levels. These findings provide guidance for future practice and research on ICs promoting change.
AmabileTMSchatzelEAMonetaGBKramerSJ (2004) Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly15(1): 5–32.
2.
AnconaDGCaldwellDF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly37(4): 634–665.
3.
AndersonMHSunPYT (2017) Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews19: 76–96.
4.
AntonakisJHouseRJ (2014) Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly25(4): 746–771.
5.
ArmenakisAAHarrisSG (2009) Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management9(2): 127–142.
6.
ArmenakisAAHarrisSGMossholderKW (1993) Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations46(6): 681–703.
7.
BarringerBRHarrisonJS (2000) Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management26(3): 367–403.
8.
BassBM (1990) From transactional to transformation leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics18(3): 19–31.
9.
BennisW (1999) The end of leadership: Exemplary leadership is impossible without full inclusion, initiatives, and cooperation of followers. Organizational Dynamics28(1): 71–80.
10.
BennisWNanusB (2007) Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
11.
BlakeRRMoutonJS (1964) The Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
12.
BorgattiSPEverettMGFreemanLC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
13.
BrymanA (2004) Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly15(6): 729–769.
14.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
ContractorNSDeChurchLACarsonJCarterDRKeeganB (2012) The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly23(6): 994–1011.
16.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
CreswellJW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
D’InnocenzoLMathieuJEKukenbergerMR (2014) A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management42(7): 1–28.
19.
EisenbergEM (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs51(3): 227–242.
20.
FairhurstGTConnaughtonSL (2014) Leadership: A communicative perspective. Leadership10(1): 7–35.
21.
FisherTDietzJAntonakisJ (2017) Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management43(6): 1726–1753.
22.
FleishmanEAMumfordMDZaccaroSJLevinKYKorotkinALHeinMB (1991) Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly2(4): 245–287.
23.
FriedrichTLVesseyWBSchuelkeMJRuarkGAMumfordMD (2009) A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly20(6): 933–958.
24.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
25.
GronnP (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly13(4): 423–451.
26.
HackmanMZJohnsonCE (2013) Leadership: A Communication Perspective (3rd edn). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
27.
HarveySKouC-Y (2013) Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly58(3): 346–386.
28.
HiggsMJRowlandD (2010) Emperors with clothes on: The role of self-awareness in developing effective change leadership. Journal of Change Management10(4): 369–385.
29.
HouseRJHowellJM (1992) Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly3(2): 81–108.
30.
JonesRAJimmiesonNLGriffithsA (2005) The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies42(2): 361–386.
31.
KeytonJFordDJSmithFI (2008) A mesolevel communicative model of collaboration. Communication Theory18(3): 376–406.
32.
KoschmannMA (2013) The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly27(1): 61–89.
33.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
34.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2011) Sensemaking: Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. Qualitative Communication Research Methods35(3): 241–281.
35.
MillerKScottCRStageCBirkholtM (1995) Communication and coordination in an interorganizational system service provision for the urban homeless. Communication Research22(6): 679–699.
36.
MumfordMD (2006) Pathways to Outstanding Leadership: A Comparative Analysis of Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leaders. Hove: Psychology Press.
37.
MumfordMDFriedrichTLVesseyWBRuarkGA (2012) Collective leadership: Thinking about issues vis-à-vis others. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice5(4): 408–411.
38.
OliverC (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review15(2): 241–265.
39.
TourishD (2014) Leadership, more or less? A processual, communication perspective on the role of agency in leadership theory. Leadership10(1): 79–98.
40.
TourishDPinningtonA (2002) Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: An unholy trinity in the workplace?Human Relations55(2): 147–172.
41.
TourishDCraigRAmernicJ (2010) Transformational leadership education and agency perspectives in business school pedagogy: A marriage of inconvenience?British Journal of Management21(s1): S40–S59.
42.
TriceHMBeyerJM (1993) The Culture of Work Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
43.
WeickKE (1984) Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist39(1): 40–49.
44.
WeickKESutcliffeKMObstfeldD (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science16(4): 409–421.
45.
YammarinoFJSalasESerbanAet al. (2012) Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the ‘we’ in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice5(4): 382–402.
46.
YuklG (2012) Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. The Academy of Management Perspectives26(4): 66–85.
47.
YuklG (2013) Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
