This article presents a critical-interpretive investigation of an interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability. It highlights the potential and problems in such a process and exposes how sustainable development influences collaboration. Through collaborating, members can develop a better understanding of the economic, social, and environmental issues affecting their region’s sustainability and challenging their organizations’ legitimacy. By sharing experiences and expectations of sustainable development, members can also develop better relationships and respond to various pressures for sustainable development. However, the ideological foundations of sustainable development philosophy can make such collaboration an extremely tense and political process. As members explore solutions that integrate environmental, economic, and social sustainability dimensions in the local and regional context, they may also strive to preserve or enhance their organizational interests. Ultimately, they may compromise on fairly easy or abstract solutions that can build their organization’s reputation and legitimacy rather than serve the wider remit of sustainable development.
AndriofJ.WaddockS. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In AndriofJ.WaddockS.HustedB.RahmanS. S. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 19-42). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
4.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
5.
BachmanR.ZaheerA. (2008). Trust in inter-organizational relations. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 533-554). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BallardD. A.SeiboldD. R. (2003). Communicating and organizing in time: A meso-level model of organizational temporality. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 380-415.
7.
BanerjeeS. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24, 143-180.
8.
BansalP. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 122-131.
9.
BerkeP. R.ConroyM. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development?Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 21-33.
10.
BiermannF.MolA. P. J.GlasbergenP. (2007). Conclusion: Partnerships for sustainability—Reflections on a future research agenda. In GlasbergenP.BiermannF.MolA. P. J. (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development (pp. 288-299). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
11.
BradburyH.Lichtenstein,B. M. B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11, 551-564.
12.
BrinkerhoffJ. M. (2007). Partnership as a means to good governance: Towards an evaluation framework. In GlasbergenP.BiermannF.MolA. P. J. (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham, England: Edwin Elgar.
13.
BrownL. R. (1996). We can build a sustainable economy. The Futurist, 30(4), 8-12.
14.
BurgessJ.HarrisonC. M. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445-1460.
15.
CharmazK. (1994). “Discovering” chronic illness: Using grounded theory. In GlaserB. G. (Ed.), More grounded theory methodology: A reader (pp. 65-94). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16.
ChisholmR. F. (2008). Developing interorganizational networks. In CummingsT. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organization development (pp. 629-650). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
ConnorR.DoversS. (2004). Institutional change for sustainable development. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
18.
CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (2008a). The field of inter-organizational relations: A jungle or an Italian garden? In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 719-738). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19.
CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.). (2008b). Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
DiamondJ. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fall or succeed. New York, NY: Penguin.
21.
DoversS. R.HandmerJ. W. (1992). Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change, 2, 262-276.
22.
DresnerS. (2002). The principles of sustainability. London, England: Earthscan.
23.
DryzekJ. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
DyerJ. H.SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 660-679.
25.
EgriC. P.HermanS. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 571-604.
26.
EgriC. P.PinfieldL. T. (1996). Organizations and the biosphere: Ecologies and environments. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 459-483). London, England: Sage.
27.
EhrenfeldJ. R. (1999). Cultural structure and the challenge of sustainability. In SextonK.MarcusA. A.EasterK. W.BurkhardtT. D. (Eds.), Better environmental decisions: Strategies for governments, businesses and communities (pp. 223-244). Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
EisenbergE. M.WittenM. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review, 12, 418-426.
29.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777-795.
30.
FreemanC.LittlewoodS.WhitneyD. (1996). Local government and emerging models of participation in the Local Agenda 21 process. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39, 65-78.
31.
GladwinT. N.KennellyJ. J.KrauseT.-S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
32.
GlasbergenP.BiermannF.MolA. P. J. (Eds.). (2007). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
33.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
34.
GouletD. (2004). Is sustainable development possible in a globalized world?Humanomics, 20, 3-16.
35.
GrayB. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936.
36.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
GrayB. (1999). The development of global environmental regimes: Organizing in the absence of authority. In CooperiderD.DuttonJ. E. (Eds.), The organizational dimensions of global change: No limits to cooperation (pp. 185-209). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
GrayB. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In FaulknerD.De RondM. (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business and organizational issues (pp. 243-260). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39.
GrayB. (2004). Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 166-176.
40.
GrayB.ArissS. S. (1985). Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 707-723.
41.
GrayB.WoodD. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 3-22.
42.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (Vol. 2, McCarthyT., Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon.
43.
HamptonG. (1999). Environmental equity and public participation. Policy Sciences, 32, 163-174.
44.
HardyC.LawrenceT. B.GrantD. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 58-77.
45.
HardyC.PhillipsN. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9, 217-230.
46.
HartS. L. (2007). Capitalism at the crossroads: Aligning business, earth, and humanity (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.
47.
HartS. L.MilsteinM. B. (1999). Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 23-33.
48.
HassardJ. (1996). Images of time in work and organization. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 581-598). London, England: Sage.
49.
HawkenP. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York, NY: Collins Business.
50.
HawkenP.LovinsA.LovinsL. H. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
51.
HedigerW. (1997). Towards an ecological economics of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 5, 101-109.
52.
HedigerW. (1999). Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 26, 1120-1143.
53.
HempelL. C. (1999). Conceptual and analytical categories in building sustainable communities. In MazmanianD. A.KraftM. E. (Eds.), Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy (pp. 43-74). Cambridge: MIT Press.
54.
HicksonD. J.HiningsC. R.LeeC. A.SchneckR. E.PenningsJ. M. (1971). A strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
55.
HuxhamC.BeechN. (2008). Inter-organizational power. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 555-579). Oxford, England: Oxford University.
56.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1159-1175.
57.
HuxhamC.VangenS. (2005). Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London, England: Routledge.
58.
InnesJ. E. (1999). Evaluating consensus building. In SusskindL.McKearnanS.Thomas-LarmerJ. (Eds.), The consensus building handbook (pp. 631-675). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
JenningsP. D.ZandbergenP. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
60.
KitchenT.WhitneyD.LittlewoodS. (1997). Local authority/academic collaboration and Local Agenda 21 policy processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40, 645-659.
61.
LaffertyW. M. (1996). The politics of sustainable development: Global norms for national implementation. Environmental Politics, 5, 185-208.
62.
LapintineK. (1998). Analysis and evaluating argumentation in planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 187-204.
63.
LawrenceA. T. (2002). The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch Shell. In AndriofJ.WaddockS.HustedB.RahmanS. S. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 185-199). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
64.
LoflandJ. (1996). Social movement organizations: Guide to research on insurgent realities. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
65.
LogsdonJ. M. (1991). Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 23-37.
66.
LotiaN.HardyC. (2008). Critical perspectives on collaboration. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 366-389). Oxford, England: Oxford University.
67.
McEvilyB.PerroneV.ZaheerA. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91-103.
68.
MeadowcroftJ. (2000). Sustainable development: A new(ish) idea for a new century?Political Studies, 48, 370-387.
69.
MeppemT.GillR. (1998). Planning for sustainability as a learning concept. Ecological Economics, 26, 121-137.
70.
MeyerA. D.GabaV.ColwellK. A. (2005). Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organization Science, 16, 456-473.
71.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
O’LearyR.BinghamL. B. (2007). Conclusion: Conflict and collaboration in networks. International Public Management Journal, 10, 103-109.
73.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
74.
PasqueroJ. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 38-64.
PearceD.BarbierE. (2000). Blueprint for a sustainable economy. London, England: Earthscan.
77.
PetersonT. R. (1997). Sharing the earth: The rhetoric of sustainable development. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
78.
PfefferJ. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
79.
PonceletE. C. (2001). Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnerships. Policy Sciences, 34, 273-301.
80.
PrasadA.MirR. (2002). Digging deep for meaning: A critical hermeneutical analysis of CEO letters to shareholders in the oil industry. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 92-116.
81.
PresasT. (2001). Interdependence and partnership: Building blocks to sustainable development. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8, 203-208.
82.
ProvanK. G.SydowJ. (2008). Evaluating inter-organizational relationships. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 691-715). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
83.
RasmussenP. N. (2001). Towards a sustainable future. OECD Observer, Summer (226/227), 4-5.
84.
RicoeurP. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
85.
RobertsN. C.BradleyR. T. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 209-227.
86.
RondinelliD. A.LondonT. (2002). Stakeholder and corporate responsibilities in cross-sectoral environmental collaborations: Building value, legitimacy and trust. In AndriofJ.WaddockS.HustedB.RahmanS. S. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 201-216). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
87.
RoomeN.WijenF. (2005). Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management. Organization Studies, 27, 235-263.
88.
SachsJ. D. (2005). The end of poverty. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
89.
SandfortJ.MilwardH. B. (2008). Collaborative service provision in the public sector. In CropperS.EbersM.HuxhamC.RingP. S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 147-174). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
90.
SelmanP.ParkerJ. (1997). Citizenship, civicness and social capital in Local Agenda 21. Local Environment, 2, 171-184.
91.
SengeP. M.LichtensteinB. B.KaeuferK.BradburyH.CarrollJ. S. (2007). Collaborating for systemic change. Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 45-53.
92.
SharfmanM. P.GrayB.YanA. (1991). The context of interorganizational collaboration in the garment industry: An institutional perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 181-208.
93.
SharmaS. (2002). Research in corporate sustainability: What really matters? In SharmaS.StarikM. (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 1-29). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
94.
SharmaS.StarikM. (2004). Stakeholders, the environment and society: Multiple perspectives, emerging consensus. In SharmaS.StarikM. (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment and society (pp. 1-22). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
95.
ShrivastavaP.HartS. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4, 154-165.
96.
StarikM.RandsG. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 908-935.
97.
ThomsonA. M.PerryJ. L.MillerT. K. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 23-56.
98.
TisdellC. (2001). The Winnipeg principles, WTO and sustainable development: Proposed policies for reconciling trade and the environment. Sustainable Development, 9, 204-212.
99.
TurcotteM.-F. (2000). Working non-“stop” for sustainable development: Case study of a Canadian environmental NGO’s relationship with businesses since 1970. In BendellJ. (Ed.), Terms for endearment (pp. 118-134). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
100.
TurcotteM.-F.PasqueroJ. (2001). The paradox of multi-stakeholder collaborative roundtables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 447-464.
101.
United Nations. (1992). The global partnership for environment and development: A guide to Agenda 21. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
104.
VelasquezJ. (2001). National framework for inter-linkages: Bridging problems and solutions to work toward further implementation of Agenda 21. Global Environmental Change, 11, 335-342.
105.
VlaarP. W. L.BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2006). Coping with problems of understanding in inter-organizational relationships: Using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies, 27, 1617-1638.
106.
WaddellS. (2005). Societal learning and change: How governments, business and civil society are creating solutions to complex multi-stakeholder problems. Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
107.
WeickK. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). London, England: Addison-Wesley.
108.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
109.
WelfordR. J. (1998). Corporate environmental management, technology and sustainable development: Postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7, 1-12.
110.
WoodD. J.GrayB. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
111.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
