The role of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in the governance of global supply chains is typically neglected or simply dismissed as ineffective. This is understandable as global supply chains have undermined the traditional nation state (horizontal) paradigm of global labour governance, most notably the international Conventions agreed by the tripartite constituents (governments, employers and workers’ representatives) of the ILO. But this simply poses the question of whether, and if so how, the ILO can reframe the system of global labour governance to include the (vertical) global supply chains that all too often fail to deliver ‘decent work for all’. Based on an extended ethnographic study, we demonstrate how policy entrepreneurs (international civil servants) within the ILO can play a pivotal role in not only reframing the discourse in a way that resonates with the ‘lived experiences’ of constituents but also ‘orchestrate’ the social partners in order to secure majority support for a process that might ultimately lead to a new standard (Convention) for decent work in global supply chains. A new approach to employment relationships in global supply chains is ‘in the making’, with the potential to improve working conditions and rights at work for millions across the globe.
AbbottKWGenschelPSnidalDZanglB (2015) Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In: AbbottKWGenschelPSnidalDZanglB (eds) International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–36.
2.
AlstonP (2004) ‘Core labour standards’ and the transformation of the international labour rights regime. European Journal of International Law15(3): 437–521.
3.
BaccaroL (2015) Orchestration for the ‘social partners’ only: Internal constraints on the ILO. In: AbbottKWGenschelPSnidalDZanglB (eds) International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 262–285.
4.
BaccaroLMeleV (2012) Pathology of path dependency? The ILO and the challenge of new governance. Industrial & Labor Relations Review65(2): 195–224.
5.
BarnettMNFinnemoreM (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
BélandD (2009) Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy16(5): 701–718.
7.
BélandDOrensteinMA (2013) International organizations as policy actors: An ideational approach. Global Social Policy13(2): 125–143.
8.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
9.
BolléP (2006) The ILO’s new Convention on maritime labour: An innovative instrument. International Labour Review145(1–2): 135–142.
10.
Boockmann (2003) Mixed motives: An empirical analysis of ILO roll-call votes. Constitutional Political Economy14(4): 263–285.
11.
CarstensenMBSchmidtVA (2016) Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy23(3): 318–337.
12.
CoeNYeungH (2015) Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
CollinsH (2004) Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences3(2): 125–143.
14.
CornelissenJPWernerMD (2014) Putting framing into perspective: A review of framing analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals8(1): 181–235.
15.
CoxRW (1965) Towards a general theory of international organization. Industrial & Labor Relations Review19(1): 99–106.
16.
CoxRW (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millenium: Journal of International Studies10(2): 126–155.
17.
DeaconB (2013) Global Social Policy in the Making: The Foundations of the Social Protection Floor. Bristol: Policy Press.
18.
GereffiGLeeJ (2016) Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics133(1): 25–38.
19.
GillJJohnsonP (2010) Research Methods for Managers (4th edn). London: SAGE.
20.
HaasE (1964) Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Organization. Colchester: ECPR Press.
21.
HabermasJ (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
22.
HallP (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics25(3): 275–296.
23.
HasselA (2008) The evolution of a global labor governance regime. Governance21(2): 231–251.
24.
HelferL (2006) Understanding change in international organizations: Globalization and innovation in the ILO. Vanderbilt Law Review59(3): 649–726.
25.
HughesSHaworthN (2011) The International Labour Organization (ILO): Coming in from the Cold. Abingdon: Routledge.
26.
ILO (1919) ILO Constitution. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
27.
ILO (1998) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
28.
ILO (2015) World Economic and Social Outlook 2015. Geneva: International Labour Office.
KlandermansB (1986) Psychology and trade union participation: Joining, acting, quitting. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology59(3): 189–204.
32.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
33.
LangleyASmallmanCTsoukasHVan de VenAH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
34.
LillieN (2006) A Global Union for Global Workers: Collective Bargaining and Regulatory Politics in Maritime Shipping. Oxford: Routledge.
35.
LillieN (2008) The ILO Maritime Labour Convention, 2006: A new paradigm for global labour rights implementation. In: PapadakisK (ed.) Cross-Border Social Dialogue and Agreements: An Emerging Global Industrial Relations Framework. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 191–217.
36.
LockeR (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MarginsonP (2016) Governing work and employment relations in an internationalized economy: The institutional challenge. Industrial & Labor Relations Review69(5): 1033–1055.
38.
MaupainF (1987) La reforme de l’Organisation Internationale du Travail. Annuaire français de Droit international33(1): 478–497.
39.
MaupainF (2013) The Future of the International Labour Organization in the Global Economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
40.
MorseD (1969) Origin and Evolution of the I.L.O. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
NiforouC (2014) International framework agreements and the democratic deficit of global labour governance. Economic & Industrial Democracy35(2): 367–386.
42.
PentlandBT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review24(4): 711–724.
43.
PolanyiK (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
44.
PosthumaCRossiA (2017) Coordinated governance in global value chains: Supranational dynamics and the role of the International Labour Organization. New Political Economy22(2): 186–202.
45.
RaelinJA (2008) Emancipatory discourse and liberation. Management Learning39(5): 519–540.
46.
ReineckeJDonagheyJ (2015) After Rana Plaza: Building coalition power for labour rights between unions and (consumption based) social movement organizations. Organization22(5): 720–740.
47.
RoyleT (2010) The ILO’s shift to promotional principles and the ‘privatization’ of labour rights. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations26(3): 249–271.
48.
RyderG (2003) Remarks of the ICFTU General Secretary Guy Ryder, 23October. Speech to the Danish Confederation of Trade Unions.
RyderG (2015) Address by Guy Ryder, Director-General of the International Labour Organization, 20June. Paris, France.
51.
SchmidtVA (2007) Trapped by their ideas: French élites’ discourses of European integration and globalization. Journal of European Public Policy14(7): 992–1009.
52.
SchmidtVA (2010) Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review2(1): 1–25.
53.
SchmidtVA (2011) Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies5(2): 106–126.
54.
SchmidtVA (2014) Speaking to the markets or to the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of the EU’s sovereign debt crisis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations16(1): 188–209.
55.
SnowDABenfordRD (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In: KlandermansBKriesiHTarrowS (eds) International Social Movement Research: From Structure to Action, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 197–218.
56.
SnowDARochfordEBWordenSBenfordRD (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilisation, and movement participation. American Sociological Review51(4): 464–481.
57.
StandingG (2008) The ILO: An agency for globalization?Development and Change39(3): 355–384.
58.
ThomasH (2016) Good practices by multinational enterprises in the promotion of decent work in the global tea supply chain. In: ILO Sectoral Studies on Decent Work in Global Supply Chains. Geneva: International Labour Office, 101–138.
59.
TsoukasH (2009) Craving for generality and small-N studies: A Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and management studies. In: BuchananDBrymanA (eds) SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: SAGE, 285–301.
60.
TurnbullP (1999) Regulation, deregulation or re-regulation of transport?Paper presented at the Symposium on the Social and Labour Consequences of Technological Developments, Deregulation and Privatization of Transport. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
61.
TurnbullP (2006) Social Dialogue in the Process of Structural Adjustments and Private Sector Participation in Ports: A Practical Guidance Manual. Geneva: International Labour Office.
62.
TurnbullP (2013) Promoting the Employment of Women in the Transport Sector – Obstacles and Policy Options. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
