This article is a follow-up of Alvesson and Kärreman (2011a), which was in itself a follow-up of Alvesson and Kärreman (2000), and a response to a critique of the former by Hardy and Grant (2012). The critique is addressed directly and the logic behind it investigated critically. The article also addresses wider concerns regarding the politics of research and publishing and the conditions of critique at the present time. The pressure and eagerness to get published lead to strong subspecialization and an inclination to build research approaches within which authors are inclined to reproduce shared assumptions and be unwelcome to critical explorations. The article points to the risk of assumption-challenging work being marginalized through the anticipation of critique leading to hostile reactions and specialized, politically motivated reviewers blocking the publication of far-reaching critique.
AlvessonMHardyCHarleyB (2008) Reflecting on reflexivity: Reappraising reflexive practice in organisation and management theory. Journal of Management Studies45(3): 480–501.
4.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2000) Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations53(9): 1125–1149.
5.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2011a) Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations64(9): 1121–1146.
6.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2011b) Organizational discourse analysis – well done or too rare?Human Relations64(9): 1193–1202.
7.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2011c) Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery as Method. London: SAGE.
8.
AlvessonMSandbergJ (2013) Constructing Research Questions. Doing Interesting Research through Problematization. London: SAGE.
AlvessonMSveningssonS (2003) The good visions, the bad micro-management and the ugly ambiguity: Contradictions of (non-)leadership in a knowledge-intensive company. Organization Studies24(6): 961–988.
FairhurstG (2009) Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations62(11): 1607–1634.
19.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
20.
GrantDHardyCOswickCPutnamL (2004) (eds) Handbook of Organizational Discourse. London: SAGE.
21.
HardyCGrantD (2012) Readers beware: Provocation, problematization and … problems. Human Relations65(5): 547–566.
22.
HardyCLawrenceTGrantD (2005) Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review30: 58–77.
23.
IedemaR (2011) Discourse studies in the 21st century: A response to Mats Alvesson and Dan Kärreman’s ‘Decolonializing discourse’. Human Relations64 (9): 1163–1176.
24.
JackallR (1988) Moral Mazes. The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
KärremanDAlvessonM (2001) Making newsmakers: Conversational identity at work. Organization Studies22(1): 59–89.
26.
KundaG (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
LewisMWKelemenML (2002) Multiparadigm inquiry: Exploring organizational pluralism and paradox. Human Relations55(2): 251–275.
28.
MumbyDK (2011) What’s cooking in organizational discourse studies? A response to Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations64(9): 1147–1161.
29.
PfefferJ (1993) Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review18(4): 599–620.
30.
PfefferJ (1995) Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science6: 681–686.
31.
PhillipsNOswickC (2012) Organizational discourse: Domains, debates and directions. Academy of Management Annals6(1): 435–481.
32.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.
33.
ReedM (1996) Organizational theorizing: An historically contested terrain. In: CleggSHardyCNordW (eds) The Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 31–56.
34.
RolinK (2011) Diversity and dissent in the social sciences. The case of organization studies. Philosophy of the Social Sciences41(4): 470–494.
35.
RortyR (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
RosenM (1985) Breakfast at Spiro’s: Dramaturgy and dominance. Journal of Management11(2): 31–48.
37.
RosenM (1988) You asked for it: Christmas at the bosses’ expense. Journal of Management Studies25(5): 462–480.
38.
RøvikKA (2011) From fashion to virus. An alternative theory of organizations’ handling of management ideas. Organization Studies32(5): 631–653.
39.
SchererA (1998) Pluralism and incommensurability in strategic management and organization theory: A problem in search of a solution. Organization5(2): 147–168.
40.
SchwartzmanHB (1987) The significance of meetings in an American mental health center. American Ethnologist14: 271–294.
TadajewskiM (2009) The debate that won’t die? Values incommensurability, antagonism and theory choice. Organization16(4): 467–485.
43.
ThomasRSargentLDHardyC (2011) Managing organizational change: Negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science22(1): 22–41.
44.
ThompsonPHarleyB (2012) Beneath the radar? A critical realist analysis of ‘the knowledge economy’ and ‘shareholder value’ as competing discourses. Organization Studies33(10): 1363–1381.
45.
TienariJVaaraE (2011) On the narrative constructions of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science22(2): 370–390.
46.
VaaraEMoninP (2010) A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquistions. Organization Science21(1): 3–22.
47.
Van MaanenJ (1995a) Style as theory. Organization Science6(1): 133–143.
48.
Van MaanenJ (1995b) Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science6(6): 687–692.
49.
WatsonT (1994) In Search of Management. London: Routledge.
