In this article we respond to Bargiela-Chiappini, Iedema and Mumby.We notice that there is considerable agreement concerning the state of the art of organizational discourse analysis, while also discussing the disagreements. We expand on some of the ontological issues inherent in our argument, further discuss the character of reductionism in organizational discourse analysis, the trappings of a priori assumptions, and, finally, argue that our critics themselves, perhaps inadvertently, tend to repeat the problematic moves we identified in our original article.
Alvesson M. and Deetz S. ( 2000) Doing Critical Management Research. London: SAGE.
2.
Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. ( 2000a) Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations53(9): 1125-1149.
3.
Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. ( 2000b) Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science36(2): 134-156.
4.
Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. ( 2007) Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development . Academy of Management Review32: 1265-1281.
5.
Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. ( 2011a) Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations64.
6.
Alvesson M. and Kärreman D. ( 2011b) Qualitative Research and Theory Development. Mystery as Method. London: SAGE.
7.
Alvesson M. and Sköldberg K. ( 2009) Reflexive Methodology, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
8.
Bargiela-Chiappini F. ( 2011) Discourse(s), social construction and language practices . In conversation with Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations64.
9.
Deetz S. ( 1996) Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science7: 191-207.
10.
Geertz C. ( 1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Hardy C., Grant D., Oswick C. and Putnam L. ( 2005) Diss-ing discourse? A response. Organization Studies26: 799-804.
12.
Iedema R. ( 2011) Discourse studies in the 21st century: A response to Mats Alvesson and Dan Kärreman’s ‘Decolonializing discourse’ . Human Relations64.
13.
Mumby DK ( 2011) What’s cooking in organizational discourse studies? A response to Alvesson and Kärreman. Human Relations64.
14.
Rorty R. ( 1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Wiley N. ( 1988) The micro-macro problem in social theory. Sociological Theory6: 254-261.
