Constructive Pluralism for a Theory of Organization: Rediscovering Our Community,Identity,and Vocation

Bloom P. (2015). Scientific faith is different from religious faith. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/11/why-scientific-faith-isnt-the-same-as-religious-faith/417357/ (accessed 20 February 2018).

Boxenbaum E. Strandgaard Pedersen J. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism: A case of institutional work. In Lawrence T. B. Suddaby R. Leca B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 178–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.

De Cock C. O’Doherty D . (2017). Ruin and Organization Studies.·Organization Studies, 37, 129–150.

De Rond M . (2017). Doctors at war: Life and death in a field hospital. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Du Gay P. Vikkelsø S . (2016). For formal organization: The past in the present and future of organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Emerson M. (2016). At its heart, science is faith-based too. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-its-heart-science-is-faith-based-too-1457049114 (accessed 20 February 2018).

Fish S. (2015). Think again: Contrarian reflections on life, culture, politics, religion, law, and education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Follett M. P. (1918). The new state: Group organization the solution for popular government. New York: Longman Green & Co.

Follett M. P. (1930/1924). Creative experience. New York: Longman Green & Co.

Frenkel M. Shenhav Y. (2006). From binarism back to hybridity: Decolonizing management and organization studies. Organization Studies, 27, 855–876.

Hacking I. (1986). Making up people. In Heller T. Sosna M. Wellbery D. W. (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hirschman A. O. (1995). A capacity for self-subversion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hirschman A. O. (2001). Crossing boundaries: Selected writings. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

Ibarra-Colado E. (2006). Organization Studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13, 463–488.

Kornberger M. Leixnering S. Meyer R. E. Höllerer M. A. (2017). Rethinking the sharing economy: The nature and organization of sharing in the 2015 refugee crisis. AOM Discoveries, pp. 1–32. DOI: 10.5465/amd.2016.0138.

Krücken G. Mazza C. Meyer R. E. Walgenbach P. (2017). New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

March J. G. (1995). The future, disposable organizations and the rigidities of imagination. Organization, 2(3–4), 427–440.

Meyer R. E. Boxenbaum E. (2010). Exploring European-ness in organization research. Organization Studies, 31, 737–755.

Powell W. W. (2017). A sociologist looks at crowds: Innovation or invention? Strategic Organization, 15, 289–297.

Reed M. Burrell G. (2018). Theory and organization studies: The need for contestation. Organization Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0170840617745923.

Said E. (2007). On late style: Music and literature against the grain. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Schoeneborn D. Scherer A. G. (2012). Clandestine organizations, al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in)visibility: A response to Stohl and Stohl. Organization Studies, 33, 963–971.

Selznick P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13, 25–35.

Weber M. (1946/1919). Science as a vocation [Wissenschaft als Beruf]. In Gerth H. H. Wright Mills C. (translated and edited), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.