We examine how passive ‘face time’ (i.e. the amount of time one is passively observed, without interaction) affects how one is perceived at work. Findings from a qualitative study of professional office workers suggest that passive face time exists in two forms: 1) being seen at work during normal business hours — or expected face time, and 2) being seen at work outside of normal business hours — or extracurricular face time. These two forms of passive face time appear to lead observers to make trait inferences (i.e. they lead observers to perceive employees as either ‘dependable’ or ‘committed’, depending on the form of passive face time). Findings from an experimental study confirm our qualitative findings and suggest that trait inferences are made spontaneously (i.e. without intent or knowledge of doing so).We discuss the implications of our findings for theories of person perception and the practice of performance appraisal.
Albright L., Kenny DA, and Malloy TE ( 1988) Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55(3): 387-395.
2.
Alley N. ( 1997) Performance appraisals for virtual workers. Business and Management Practices42: 3-4.
3.
Anderson SM, Klatzky RL ( 1987) Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(2): 235-246.
4.
Barrick MR, Mount MK ( 1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta analysis. Personnel Psychology44(1): 1-27.
5.
Bergeron D. ( 2007) The paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review32(4): 1078-1095.
6.
Bolino MC ( 1999) Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review24(1): 82-98.
7.
Bolino MC, Varela JA, Bande B., and Turnley WH ( 2006) The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(3): 281-297.
8.
Bommer WH, Johnson J., Rich GA, Podsakoff PM, and MacKenzie SB ( 1995) On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology48(3): 587-605.
9.
Boston Globe ( 2001) Out in the field/telecommuting; Several obstacles bar rise of remote work. 11 November, p. G2.
10.
Brandel M. ( 2002) New technology: Covering all the bases. Computerworld36: 28-29.
11.
Carlston DE, Skowronski JJ ( 1994) Savings in relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66(5): 840-856.
12.
Carlston DE, Skowronski JJ ( 2005) Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 884-898.
13.
Cialdini RB ( 1980) Full-cycle social psychology. In: Bickman L (ed.) Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 21-47.
14.
Conlin M. ( 2006) Smashing the clock; No fixed schedules. No mandatory meetings . Inside Best Buy’s radical reshaping of the workplace. Business Week, 11 December, p. 60.
15.
Cramton CD ( 2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science12(3): 346-371.
16.
Daft RL, Lengel RH, and Trevino LK ( 1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly11(3): 355-366.
17.
Duarte NT, Goodson JR, and Klich NR ( 1993) How do I like thee? Let me appraise the ways. Journal of Organizational Behavior14(3): 239-249.
18.
Duarte NT, Goodson JR, and Klich NR ( 1994) Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal37(3): 499-521.
19.
Dunn-Jensen LM ( 2004) Unmasking face time: Why individuals engage in visibility behavior. Paper presented at the 2004 Academy of Management Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Duxbury L. ( 1999) Workplace. The Ottawa Citizen, 23 April, p. F12.
21.
Eastman KK ( 1994) In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal37(5): 1379-1391.
22.
Fine GA, Elsbach KD ( 2000) Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory-building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative lab data . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology36(1): 51-76.
23.
Fiske ST, Taylor SE ( 1991) Social Cognition, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Giacalone RA, Rosenfeld P. ( 1989) Impression Management in the Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Giacalone RA, Rosenfeld P. ( 1991) Applied Impression Management: How Image-making Affects Managerial Decisions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
26.
Gilbert DT ( 1998) Ordinary personology. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, and Lindzey G (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology , Volume 2. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 89-150.
27.
Gilbert J. ( 2004) Face time. Sales and Marketing Management156(1): 30-35.
28.
Goldberg LR ( 1990) An alternative ‘description of personality’: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(6): 1216-1229.
29.
Gopinath C. ( 2003) Those workplace myths are true! Businessline, 10 March, p. 1.
30.
Grant T. ( 2009) To consider at the next staff pajama party; Tavia Grant dissects the latest workplace and career trends, The Globe and Mail, 7 February, p. B15.
31.
Hallowell EM ( 1999) The human moment at work. Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 58-66.
32.
Hampson SE, Goldberg LR ( 2006) A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91(4): 763-779.
33.
Hoffman C., Mischel W., and Mazze K. ( 1981) The role of purpose in the organization of information about behavior: Trait-based versus goal-based categories in person cognition . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40(2): 211-225.
34.
Johnson DE, Erez A., Kiker DS, and Motowidlo SJ ( 2002) Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals’ reputations, helpful behaviors, and raters’ reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology87(4): 808-815.
35.
Joyce A. ( 2002) Early to arrive, early to exit. Less face time in the office can mean little recognition, fewer promotions. The Washington Post, 23 June, p. H06.
36.
Judd CM ( 2000) Everyday data analysis in social psychology. In: Reis H and Judd CM (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 370-392.
37.
Kammrath LK, Mendoza-Denton R., and Mischel W. ( 2005) Incorporating if . . . then . . . personality signatures in person perception: Beyond the person-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(4): 605-618.
38.
Knapp M., Hall JA ( 2002) Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, 5th edn. Crawfordsville, TX: Wadsworth.
39.
Kossek EE, Van Dyne L. ( 2008) Face-time matters: A cross-level model of how work-life flexibility influences work performance of individuals and groups. In: Korabik K, Leor D, and Whitehead D (eds) Handbook of Work-Family Integration: Research, Theory, and Best Practices . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 305-330.
40.
Krzystofiak F., Cardy R., and Newman J. ( 1988) Implicit personality and performance appraisal: The influence of trait inferences on evaluations of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology73: 515-521.
41.
Kvale S. ( 1996) InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lupfer MB, Clark LF, and Hutcherson HW ( 1990) Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58(2): 239-249.
44.
Maxwell SE, Delaney HD ( 1990) Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
45.
Munck B. ( 2001) Changing a culture of face time. Harvard Business Review79(10): 125-131.
Perlow LA ( 1997) Finding Time. How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
Prendergast C., Topel RH ( 1996) Favoritism in organizations. Journal of Political Economy104(5): 958-978.
49.
Reeder GD ( 1993) Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin19(5): 586-593.
50.
Reeder GD, Brewer MB ( 1979) A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review86(1): 61-79.
51.
Reeder GD, Pryor JB, and Wojciszke B. ( 1992) Trait-behavior relations in social information processing . In: Semin GR and Fielder K (eds) Language, Interaction, and Social Cognition. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 37-57.
52.
Ryan L. ( 2005) Face time: The new assembly line. In this era of the ‘knowledge worker’, why do so many managers still insist on long office hours?BusinessWeek.com, 22 April, available at: http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/apr2005/ca20050422_7217_ca004.htm .
53.
Schmidt FL, Hunter JE ( 1992) Development of a causal model of processes determining job performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science1(3): 89-91.
54.
Siegman AW, Feldtein S (eds) (1978) Nonverbal Behavior and Communication. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Strauss A., Corbin J. ( 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
56.
Todorov A., Uleman JS ( 2002) Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(5): 1051-1065.
57.
Todorov A., Uleman JS ( 2004) The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(4): 482-493.
58.
Uleman JS ( 1999) Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation. In: Chaiken S and Trope Y (eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 141-160.
59.
Uleman JS, Newman LS, and Moskowitz GB ( 1996) People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In: Zanna MP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 211-279.
60.
Waldman DA, Atwater LE, and Antonioni D. ( 1998) Has 360 feedback gone amok?Academy of Management Executive12(2): 86-94.
61.
Welch J., Welch S. ( 2007) The importance of being there. Business Week, 16 April, p. 92.
