Employees often seek to create favorable impressions with their managers. An empirical study of the antecedents, process, and consequences of influence strategies in upward impression management found that subordinates have both multiple goals and strategies. Subordinates' strategies varied with their goals in impression management. They also reported using a wider range of strategies than usually attributed to impression management. Managerial ap- praisals were based on their impressions of their subordinates, and perceptions of their influence style. While subordinates may believe that ingratiation will help them get better appraisals, using coalitions appears to lead to favorable impressions and appraisals. Subordinate assertiveness may lead to unfavorable impressions and performance appraisals.
CRANT, M. J., & BATEMAN, T. S.Assignment of credit and blame for performance out- comes. Academy of Management Joumal, 1993, 36(1), 7-27.
2.
FRENCH, J. R. P., & RAVEN, B.The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
3.
GARDNER, W. L., & MARTINKO, M. J.Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 1988, 14(2), 321-338. (a)
4.
GARDNER, W. L., & MARTINKO, M. J.Impression management: An observational study linking audience characteristics with verbal self-presentation. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31, 42-65. (b)
5.
GILMORE, D. C., & FERRIS, G. R.The effects of applicant impression management tactics on interviewer judgments. Joumal of Management, 1989, 15(4), 557-564.
6.
GODFREY, D. K., JONES, E. E., & LORD, C. G.Self-promotion is not ingratiating. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(1), 1056-1115.
7.
HINKIN, T. R., & SCHRIESHEIM, C. A.Relationships between subordinate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power. Human Relations, 1990, 43(3), 221-237.
8.
JONES, E. E., & PITIMAN, T. S.Towards a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives of the selfHillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980, pp. 231-262.
9.
JONES, E. E., GERGEN, K J., GUMPERT, P., & THIBAUT, J. W.Some conditions af- fecting the use of integration to influence performance evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1(6), 613-625.
10.
JUDGE, T. A., & FERRIS, G. R.Social context in performance evaluations. Academy of Management Joumal, 1993, 36(1), 80-105.
11.
KIPNIS, D.The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
12.
KIPNIS, D., & SCHMIDT, S. M.Profiles of organizational influence strategies: Form M. San Diego: University Associates, 1982.
13.
KIPNIS, D., & SCHMIDT, S. M.An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications , 1983, pp. 303-319.
14.
KIPNIS, D., & SCHMIDT, S. M.Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Science Quartey, 1988, 33, 528-542.
15.
KIPNIS, D., SCHMIDT, S., & WILKINSON, I.Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explo- rations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65(4), 440-452.
16.
KIPNIS, D., SCHMIDT, S., PRICE, K., & STITT, C.Why do I like thee: Is it you perform- ance or my orders?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66(3), 324-328.
17.
KUMAR, P.Supervisor's authoritarianism and ingratiation among workers. Psychological Studies, 1986, 31(2), 165-168.
18.
LEARY, M. R., & KOWALSKI, R. M.Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychology Bulletin, 1990, 107(1), 34-47.
19.
LIDEN, R. C., & MITCHELL, T. R.Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Acad- emy of Management Review, 1988, 13(4), 572-587.
20.
McGARTH, J. E., MARTIN, J., & KULKA, R. A.Judgement calls in research. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications , 1982.
21.
PERREAULT, W. D., Jr., & MILES, R. H.Influence strategy mixes in complex organizations. Behavioral Science, 1978, 23, 86-98.
22.
RALSTON, D. A.Employee ingratiation: The role of management. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(3), 477-487.
23.
SCHLENKER, B. R.Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1980.
24.
SCHMIDT, S. M., & KIPNIS, D.Managers' pursuit of individual and organizational goals. Human Relations, 1984, 37(10), 781-794.
25.
SPECTOR, P. E.Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perception at work: Myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987, 72(3), 438-443.
26.
TEDESCHI, J. T., & REISS, M.Verbal tactics of impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Ordinary explanations of social behavior. London Press, 1981, pp. 271-326.
27.
WAYNE, S. J., & FERRIS, G. R.Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervi- sor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(5), 487-499.
28.
WAYNE, S. J., & KACMAR, K. M.The effect of impression management on the perform- ance appraisal process. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 48, 70-88.
29.
YUKL, G., & FALBE, C.Influence tactics and subjectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(2), 132-140.
