In this article, we analyze an exercise in a facilitation process by showing that the structuring of this episode can be studied just by highlighting how different forms of agency (human and non-human) articulate with each other. The objective of this study is threefold: first, it aims at demonstrating that structuring effects can indeed be identified through a bottom-up approach without resorting to any form of duality or dualism, as it is common to think in the traditional literature in organizational studies (Conrad & Haynes, 2001); second, through this analysis, it illustrates the analytical power of such an approach by showing how it allows us to identify specific strategies used by the facilitators to do their work, especially in the way they select who or what is acting in a chain of agencies; third, it illustrates how the attribution of agency to artifacts allows human participants to progress throughout the facilitation process by enabling them to objectify what they are supposed to think and wish for, a process that Weick (1979) has identified as the bulk of organizing processes.
Aakhus, M.Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 2001, 29, 341–371 .
2.
Callon, M.Some elements of a sociology of translation: The domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul , 1986, pp. 196–233.
3.
Callon, M.Rèseaux technico-èconomiques et irrèversibilitès. In R. Boyer , B. Chavance & O. Godard (Eds), Les figures de l'irrèversibilitè en èconomie, vol. 47. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales , 1991, pp. 195–230.
Conrad, C. & Haynes, J.Development of key constructs. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2001, pp. 47–77.
6.
Cooren, F.The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins , 2000.
7.
Cooren, F.Acting and organizing: How speech acts structure organizational interactions . Concepts and Transformation, 2001a, 6(3), 275–293 .
8.
Cooren, F.Translation and articulation in the organization of coalitions: The Great Whale River case . Communication Theory, 2001b, 11(2), 178–200 .
9.
Cooren, F.Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings . Organization, 2004, 113, 373–393 .
10.
Cooren, F. & Fairhurst, G.T.Speech timing and spacing: The phenomenon of organizational closure . Organization, 2004, 116, 793–824 .
11.
Cooren, F. , Fox, S. , Robichaud, D. & Talih, N.Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements . Time & Society, 2005, 14(2/3), 263–280 .
12.
Deetz, S.Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press , 1992.
13.
Deetz, S.Conceptual foundations. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2001, pp. 3–46.
14.
Derrida, J.Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1985.
15.
Derrida, J.Limited Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press , 1988.
16.
Descombes, V.The mind's provisions: A critique of cognitivism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 2001.
17.
Fairclough, N.Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press , 1992.
18.
Fairclough, N.Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman , 1995.
19.
Flaubert, G.Correspondance, vol. 1. Paris: L. Conard , 1926.
20.
Garfinkel, H.Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall , 1967.
21.
Garfinkel, H.Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal society (I of IV): An announcement of studies . Sociological Theory, 1988, 6, 103–109 .
22.
Garfinkel, H.Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield , 2002.
23.
Gibson, J.J.The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1979.
24.
Giddens, A.Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan , 1979.
25.
Giddens, A.The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press , 1984.
26.
Heritage, J.Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press , 1984.
27.
Jablin, F.M. & Putnam, L.L. (Eds) The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2001.
28.
Latour, B.Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1987.
Latour, B.Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1999.
31.
Latour, B.Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The social in question. New bearings in history and the social sciences. London: Routledge , 2002, pp. 117–132.
32.
Latour, B.Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 2004.
33.
Law, J.After ANT : Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell , 1999, pp. 1–14.
34.
McPhee, R.D.Organizational communication: A structurational exemplar. In B. Dervin , L. Grossberg , B.J. O'Keefe & E. Wartella (Eds), Rethinking communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1989, pp. 199–212.
35.
McPhee, R.D.Text, agency and organization in the light of structuration theory . Organization, 2004, 113, 355–371 .
36.
McPhee, R.D. & Seibold, D.R.Responses to the finalist essays . Management Communication Quarterly, 1999, 13, 327–336 .
37.
McPhee, R.D. & Zaug, P.The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation . The Electronic Journal of Communication/La revue èlectronique de communication, 2000, 10, 1–16 .
38.
Norman, D.The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books , 1988.
39.
Peirce, C.S.Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover , 1955.
40.
Pickering, A.The mangle of practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1995.
41.
Poole, M.S. & De Sanctis, G.Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds), Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1990, pp. 173–193.
42.
Poole, M.S. , Seibold, D.R. & McPhee, R.D.Group decision-making as a structurational process . Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1985, 71, 74–102 .
43.
Putnam, L.L. & Cooren, F.Alternative perspective on the role of text and agency in constituting organizations . Organization, 2004, 113, 323–333 .
44.
Reed, M.Organizational analysis as discourse analysis: A critique. In D. Grant , T. Keenoy & C. Oswick (Eds), Discourse and organization. London: Sage , 1999, pp. 193–213.
45.
Reed, M.The limits of discourse analysis in organization analysis . Organization, 2000, 73, 524–530 .
46.
Robichaud, D.Steps toward a relational view of agency. In F. Cooren , J.R. Taylor & E.J. Van Every (Eds), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , in press.
47.
Ryle, G.The concept of mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1949.
Searle, J.R.Mind, brains, and programs . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980b, 3, 417–424 .
50.
Searle, J.R.Minds, brains, and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1984.
51.
Taylor, J.R. & Van Every, E.J.The emergent organization: Communication as site and surface. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 2000.
52.
Tompkins, P.K. & Wanca-Thibault, M.Organizational communication: Prelude and prospects. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2001, pp. xvii–xxxi.
53.
Weber, M.From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press , 1946.
54.
Weick, K.E.The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House , 1979.
