What shapes the use of a new technology? Instead of assuming that a use is already built into a technology, I argue that technology use is shaped by political processes. A central component of this involves interested organizational actors mobilizing discourses to inscribe a function into a technology. I explore this dynamic in a case where interested groups attempt to inscribe the possible use of an Australian public broadcaster's website during a public inquiry. I identify a progressive narrowing of the possible uses of the website that occurred across four successive ‘inscriptions’. This saw the website shifted from being a public resource to being a privatized outlet for advertising.The shift was not a neat process, but involved significant contestation and resistance at every step.The study shows that technical inscriptions are continually contested and resisted, inscription happens in a path-dependent fashion, and inscription is dependent on institutional platforms such as public inquiries.
Ainsworth, S.The discursive construction of older worker identity: A reflection on process and methods . Tamara, 2001, 1(4), 29–46 .
2.
Arendt, H.The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press , 1958.
3.
Arthur, W.Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical small events . Economic Journal, 1989, 99(349), 116–131 .
4.
Ball, K. & Wilson, D.C.Power, control and computer-based performance monitoring: Repertoires, resistance and subjectivities . Organization Studies, 2000, 21(3), 539–565 .
5.
Barley, S.R.Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31(1), 78–108 .
6.
Barley, S.R.The alignment of technology through roles and networks . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1), 61–103 .
7.
Bijker, W.E.Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Towards a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 1995.
8.
Bijker, W.E. , Hughes, T.E. & Pinch, T. (Eds) The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 1987.
9.
Bloomfield, B.Power, machines and social relations: Delegating to information technology in the National Health Service . Organization, 1995, 2(3/4), 489–518 .
10.
Bloomfield, B.P. & Best, A.Management consultants – Systems-development, power and translation problems . Sociological Review, 1992, 40(3), 533–560 .
11.
Bloomfield, B.P. & Coombs, R.Information technology, control and power – The centralization and decentralisation debate revisited . Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(4), 459–484 .
12.
Braverman, H.Labour and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press , 1974.
13.
Brown, A.D.Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation . Journal of Management Studies, 1998, 35(1), 35–58 .
14.
Brown, A.D.Making sense of inquiry sensemaking . Journal of Management Studies, 2000, 37(1), 45–75 .
15.
Brown, A.D.Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(1), 95–112 .
16.
Brown, A.D. & Jones, M.Honourable members and dishonourable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ‘arms to Iraq’ affair . Human Relations, 2000, 53(5), 655–689 .
17.
Buchanan, D. & Badham, R.Power, politics, and organizational change: Winning the turf game. London: Sage , 1999.
18.
Burns, M.ABC Online: A pre-history . Media Information Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, 2000, 97.
19.
Castells, M.The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2000.
20.
Child, J.Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice . Sociology, 1972, 6(1), 1–22 .
21.
Cockburn, C.Brothers: Male domination and technological change. London: Pluto Press , 1981.
22.
David, P.Clio and the economics of QWERTY . American Economic Review, 1985, 75(2), 332–337 .
Doolin, B.Narratives of change: Discourse, technology and organization . Organization, 2003, 10(4), 751–770 .
25.
Fairclough, N.Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman , 1995.
26.
Feenberg, A.Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2002.
27.
Garud, R. & Rappa, M.The socio-cognative model of technological evolution: The case of cochlear implants . Organization Science, 1994, 5(3), 344–362 .
28.
Garud, R. , Jain, S. & Kumaraswamy, A.Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java . Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(1), 196–214 .
29.
Gephart, R.The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking . Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(6), 1465–1514 .
30.
Grant, D. , Kennoy, T. & Oswick, C. (Eds) Discourse and organization. London: Sage , 1998.
31.
Grint, K. & Woolgar, S.The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. Cambridge: Polity , 1997.
32.
Habermas, J.The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, trans. T. Berger & F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 1991.
33.
Hardy, C. & Phillips, N.No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system . Organization Studies, 1999, 20(1), 1–24 .
34.
Hayes, N. & Walsham, G.Competing interpretations of computer-supported cooperative work in organizational contexts . Organization, 2000, 7(1), 49–67 .
35.
Heracleous, L. & Barrett, M.Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation . Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(4), 755–778 .
Jacques, R.Manufacturing the employee: Management knowledge from the 19th to 21st centuries. London: Sage , 1996.
38.
Joerges, B. & Czarniawska, B.The question of technology, or how organizations inscribes the world . Organization Studies, 1998, 19(3), 363–385 .
39.
Maguire, S.The coevolution of technology and discourse: A study of substitution processes for the insecticide DDT . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(1), 113–134 .
40.
Mahoney, J.Path dependency in historical sociology . Theory and Society, 2000, 29(4), 507–548 .
41.
Munir, K.The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field . Organization Studies, 2005, 26(1), 93–112 .
42.
Munir, K. & Jones, M.Discontinuity and after: The social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance . Organization Studies, 2004, 25(4), 361–382 .
43.
Munir, K. & Phillips, N.The birth of the Kodak moment: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies . Organization Studies, 2005, 26(11), 1665–1687 .
44.
North, D.Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1990.
45.
Orlikowski, W.J.The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations . Organization Science, 1992, 3(3), 398–427 .
Pettigrew, A.The management of strategic change. Oxford: Backwell , 1987.
48.
Pierson, P.Increasing returns, path dependency, and the study of politics . American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(2), 251–267 .
49.
Phillips, N. & Hardy, C.Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2002.
50.
Pusey, M.Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1991.
51.
Rees, C.Worker responses to quality organization: Discourse and materiality in organizational change . Work, Employment and Society, 2001, 15(4), 743–761 .
52.
Ruud, G.The symphony: Organizational discourse and the symbolic tensions between artistic and business ideologies . Journal of Applied Communications Research, 2000, 28(2), 117–143 .
53.
Selsky, J. , Spicer, A. & Teicher, J.‘Totally Un-Australian!’: Discursive and institutional interplay in the Melbourne port dispute of 1997–98 . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(7), 1729–1760 .
54.
Spicer, A. & Sewell, G.Scaling the horizons of possibility: Globalisation and organizational space . Paper presented at 19th EGOS annual conference, Copenhagen, July 2003.
55.
Thompson, J.D.Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1970.
56.
Welcomer, S. , Gioia, D. & Kilduff, M.Resisting the discourse of modernity: Rationality versus emotion in hazardous waste siting . Human Relations, 2000, 53(9), 1179–1205 .
57.
Williams, R.Normal service won't be resumed: The future of public broadcasting. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin , 1996.
58.
Woodward, J.Management and technology. London: HMSO , 1958.
59.
ECITARC . Consideration of additional estimates. Senate Environment, Communications, Informations Technology and the Arts Reference Committee. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia , 10 February 2000.
60.
ECITARC . Online delivery of Australian Broadcasting Corporation material. Senate Environment, Communications, Informations Technology and the Arts Reference Committee. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia , 17 March 2000.
61.
ECITARC . Inquiry into ABC On-line: Interim report. Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Reference Committee. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia , April 2000.
62.
ECITARC . Inquiry into ABC On-line: Final report. Report of the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Reference Committee. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia , March 2001.
63.
Hansard. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Office , 2000.
64.
Johns, B.Managing director's speech to the International Institute of Communications [www.abc.net.au/corp], 15 March 2000.
65.
Media Release . ABC Online is central to the ABC's digital future. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney , 11 February 1999.
66.
Media Release . ABC welcomes new Managing Director. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney , 9 November 1999.
67.
Media Release . ABC Online reaches 10 million Accesses. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney , 11 May 2001.
68.
Shier, J.ABC must face challenged united. Daily Telegraph, Sydney, 9 December 2000.
69.
Schultz, J.Telstra and ABC Online output agreement [www.abc.net.au/corp], 8 February 2000.
