Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2004-11
Conceptualizing social science paradoxes using the diversity and similarity curves model: Illustrations from the work/play and theory novelty/continuity paradoxes
A major challenge that social science researchers face is the development of a framework that conceptualizes paradoxical concepts across different social science disciplines. We propose that researchers use the logic of the diversity and similarity curves (DSC) model to meet this need by conceptualizing the tension, reinforcing cycles, and paradox management elements of Lewis (Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 760-76). We further make a contribution to the paradox literature by highlighting and representing the interwoven nature of dual tensions that exist within paradoxical phenomena. We use the DSC model to capture the interactive effects of dual paradoxes associated with work/play and job stress/task creativity. The DSC model also allows us to represent the interactive effects of different permutations of theory novelty/continuity on perceived theory complexity and theory assimilation. Finally, we discuss the implications of this article for theory and research on paradox conceptualization.
Adler, N.A typology of management studies involving culture . Journal of International Business Studies, 1983, 14, 29-47 .
2.
Amason, A.C.Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving the paradox for top management teams . Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 123-148 .
3.
Anderson, J.V.Creativity and play: A systematic approach to managing innovation . Business Horizons, 1994, 37, 80-86 .
4.
Astley, W.G.Administrative science as socially constructed truth . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30, 497-513 .
5.
Avolio, B.J. , Howell, J.M. & Sosik, J.J.A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects . Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42, 219-227 .
Brockner, J. , Grover, S. , Reed, T. , Dewitt, R. & O’Mailey, M.Survivor’s reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help from our friends . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 526-541 .
8.
Chatman, J. & Flynn, F.J.The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative work teams . Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44, 956-974 .
9.
Chatman, J. , Polzer, J. , Barsade, S. & Neale, M.Being different and yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 749-780 .
Cook, P.The creativity advantage: Is your organization the leader of the pack?Industrial and Commercial Training, 1998, 30, 179-184 .
13.
Dandridge, T.C.Ceremony as an integration of work and play . Organization Studies, 1986, 7, 159-171 .
14.
D’Aveni, R.A.Hyper-competition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press , 1994.
15.
DiMaggio, P.J.Comment on ‘what theory is not’ . Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1995, 391-397 .
16.
Earley, P.C. & Singh, H.International and intercultural research: What is next?Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38, 327-340 .
17.
Edwards, J.R.An examination of the competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress . Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39, 292-339 .
18.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism . Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 703-705 .
19.
Fabian, F.H.Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline . Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 350-371 .
20.
Farson, R.Management of the absurd: Paradoxes in leadership. New York: Simon & Schuster , 1996.
21.
Farson, R. & Keyes, R.Whoever makes the most mistakes wins: The paradox of innovation. New York: Free Press , 2002.
22.
Handy, C.The age of paradox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press , 1994.
Hitt, M.A. , Keats, B.W. & Demarie, S.M.Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building competitive advantage and strategic flexibility in the 21st century . Academy of Management Executive, 1998, 12, 22-42 .
25.
Hock, D.Birth of the chaordic age. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler , 1999.
26.
Hollenbeck, J.R. , Ilgen, D.R. , Tuttle, D.B. & Sego, D.J.Team performance in monitoring tasks: An examination of decision errors in contexts of sustained attention . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80, 547-564 .
Karp, H. , Fuller, C. & Sirias, D.Bridging the boomer Xer gap: Creating authentic teams for high performance at work. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black , 2002.
29.
Koots, W. , Sabelis, L. & Ybema, S. (Eds). Contradictions in context: Puzzling over paradoxes in contemporary organizations. Amsterdam: VU University Press , 1996.
30.
Lewis, M.Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide . Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 760-776 .
31.
Lewis, M. & Grimes, A.J.Metatrinagulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms . Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24, 672-690 .
32.
Lewis, M. & Keleman, M.Multiparadigm inquiry: Exploring organizational pluralism and paradox . Human Relations, 2002, 55, 251-275 .
33.
Locke, K.& Golden-Biddle, K. Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring inter-textual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies . Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40, 1023-1062 .
34.
Malone, P.B.Humor: A double-edged tool for today’s managers?Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 357-360 .
35.
Mankiw, N.G.Principles of micro-economics. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden , 1998.
36.
McKinley, W. , Mone, M.A. & Moon, G.Determinants and development of schools in organizational theory . Academy of Management Review, 1999, 28, 634-648 .
37.
Miller, D.The Icarus paradox. New York: Harper Collins , 1990.
38.
Mone, M.A. & McKinley, W.The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies . Journal of Management Inquiry, 1993, 2, 284-296 .
39.
Morris, M.L. , Davis, D. & Allen, J.Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism . Journal of International Business Studies, 1994, 1, 65-89 .
40.
Newstrom, J.W.Making work fun: An important role for managers . S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 2002, 67, 4-8 .
41.
Newton, T.J. & Keenan, A.Role stress reexamined: An investigator of role stress predictors . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987, 40, 356 .
42.
Ofori-Dankwa, J.From diversity to diversimilarity: Shifting paradigms to match global and national realities. In K. Robert & M. Wilson (Eds), Policy choices: NAFTA and Michigan’s future. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press , 1996.
43.
Ofori-Dankwa, J. & Julian, S.Complexifying organizational theory: Illustrations using time research . Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26, 415-430 .
44.
Ofori-Dankwa, J. & Julian, S.Towards diversity and similarity curves: Implications for theory, research and practice . Human Relations, 2002, 52, 199-224 .
45.
Ofori-Dankwa, J. & Julian, S.Incorporating curvilinearity and temporality into the diversity and similarity model . Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Seattle, WA, August, 2003.
46.
Ofori-Dankwa, J. & Ricks, D.Research emphasis in cultural differences and or similarities: Are we asking the right questions . Journal of International Management, 2000, 6, 173-186 .
47.
Oldham, G.R. , Cummings, A. , Mischel, L.J. , Schmidtke, J.M. & Zhou, J.Listen while you work? Quasi-experimental relations between personal stereo head-sets and employee work responses . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80, 547-564 .
48.
Osigweh, C.A.Concept fallibility in organization science . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 579-594 .
49.
Perlow, L.A.The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44, 57-81 .
Pondy, L.R. & Mitroff, I.I.Beyond open system models of organization . Research in Organizational Behavior, 1979, 1, 3-39 .
52.
Poole, M. & Van De Ven, A.H.Using paradox to build management and organization theory . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 562-578 .
53.
Quinn, R.E.Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradox and competing demands of high performance. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass , 1988.
54.
Quinn, R.E. & Cameron, K.Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of changing organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger , 1988.
55.
Quinn, R.E. & Rohrbaugh, J.A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing-values approach to organizational analysis . Management Science, 1983, 29, 363-377 .
56.
Ropo, A. & Hunt, J.G.Entrepreneurial processes as virtuous and vicious spirals in a changing opportunity structure: A paradoxical perspective . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1995, 19, 91-111 .
57.
Schrage, M.SeriousPlay: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler , 1999.
58.
Spence, S. , Yasuda, A. & Alvarez, C.F.Creativity and its implications for advertising development and research techniques . Marketing and Research Today, 1997, 25, 128-133 .
Wanberg, C. , Bunce, L.W. & Gavin, M.B.Perceived fairness of layoffs among individuals who have been laid off: A longitudinal study . Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52, 59-84 .
61.
Webster, J. & Martocchio, J.J.Turning work to play: Implications for micro-computer software training . Journal of Management, 1993, 19, 127-146 .
62.
Zemke, R. , Raines, C. & Filipczak, B.Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, Xers and Nexters in your workplace. New York: Amacom , 1999.
63.
Zenger, T.R. & Marshall, C.R.Determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43, 149-163 .
