Based on Coopey’s critical review of the terms ‘Utopian sunshine’ and ‘Foucauldian gloom’ with regard to the learning organization (Coopey, 1998), this article explores the learning organization from two opposing perspectives. While researchers agree that the learning organization concept is an important one for organization science, two seemingly irreconcilable research communities are arguing about whether the learning organization is a dream or a nightmare for its members, particularly with regard to three critical dimensions: control, ideology and potentially painful employee experiences. The purpose of this article is to review and critically examine both the optimistic view of the learning organization as positive ideal and the more critical view of the learning organization as negative ideology. Based on this examination, the article aims to synthesize a new middle-ground perspective on the learning organization, referred to as the ‘fluorescent light’ view, incorporating elements from both optimistic and critical views in hopes of generating a dialog between them that will provide new research questions on control, ideology and potential pain in learning organizations.
Appelbaum, S.H. & Goransson, L.Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: A framework for research and application. The Learning Organization, 1997, 4(3), 1-17.
2.
Armstrong, H.The learning organization: Changed means to an unchanged end . Organization, 2000, 7(2), 355-361.
3.
Astley, W.G.Administrative science as socially constructed truth . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30, 497-513.
4.
Bain, A.Social defenses against organizational learning . Human Relations, 1998, 51(3), 413-430.
5.
Baker H.E. & Jennings, K.M.Dysfunctional organizational control mechanisms: An example. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 1999, 8(2), 231-239.
6.
Barker, R.T. & Camarata, M.R.The role of communication in creating and maintaining a learning organization: Preconditions, indicators, and disciplines. The Journal of Business Communication, 1998, 35(4), 443-466.
7.
Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S.Beyond strategic planning to organizational learning: Lifeblood of the individualized corporation. Strategy & Leadership, 1998, 26(1), 34-40.
8.
Bechtold, B.L.Evolving to organizational learning . Hospital Material Management Quarterly, 2000, 21(3), 11-25.
9.
Bhatt, G.D.Information dynamics, learning and knowledge creation in organizations . The Learning Organization, 2000, 7(2), 89-99.
10.
Carnall, C.A.Managing change in organizations, 3rd edn.London: Prentice Hall Europe, 1999.
Coopey, J.Learning to trust and trusting to learn: A role for radical theatre . Management Learning, 1998, 29(3), 365-382.
13.
Daft, R.L. & Weick, K.E.Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2), 284-295.
14.
De Geus, A.P.Planning as learning . Harvard Business Review,1988, March-April, 70-74.
15.
Denton, J.Organizational learning and effectiveness. London: Routledge, 1998.
16.
DiBella, A.J.Developing learning organizations: A matter of perspective . Academy of Management Review Best Paper Proceedings,1995, 287-290.
17.
Dixon, N.M.The responsibilities of members in an organization that is learning . The Learning Organization, 1998, 5(4), 1-8.
18.
Drucker, P.F.The age of social transformation . The Atlantic Monthly, 1994, November, 53-80.
19.
Duncan, R. & Weiss, A.Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1979, 1, 75-123.
20.
Dunphy, D. , Turner, D. & Crawford, M.Organizational learning as the creation of corporate competencies. Journal of Management Development, 1997, 16(4), 232-245.
21.
Duvall, C.K.Developing individual freedom to act: Empowerment in the knowledge organization . Participation & Empowerment, 1999, 7(8), 204-212.
22.
Easterby-Smith, M.Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques . Human Relations, 1997, 50(9), 1085-1114.
23.
Easterby-Smith, M. , Snell, R. & Gherardi, S.Organizational learning: Diverging communities of practice?Management Learning, 1998, 29(3), 259-272.
24.
Edmondson, A.C.Three faces of Eden: The persistence of competing theories and multiple diagnoses in organizational intervention research . Human Relations, 1996, 49(5), 571-596.
25.
Field, L.Impediments to empowerment and learning within organizations . The Learning Organization, 1997, 4(4), 1-12.
26.
Fiol, C.M. & Lyles, M.A.Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(4), 803-813.
27.
Fournier, V. & Grey, C.At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 2000, 53(7), 7-27.
28.
Fulmer, R.M. & Keys, B.A conversation with Peter Senge: New developments in organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 1998, 27(2), 33-43.
29.
Gabriel, Y.Beyond happy families: A critical reevaluation of the control-resistance-identity triangle . Human Relations, 1999, 52(2), 179-203.
30.
Garavan, T.The learning organization: A review and evaluation . The Learning Organization, 1997, 4(1), 1-16.
31.
Gherardi, S.Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery?Organization Studies, 1999, 20(1), 101-123.
32.
Goh, S.Toward a learning organization: The strategic building blocks . SAM Advanced Management Journal, 1998, 63(2), 15-21.
33.
Gozdz, K.Toward transpersonal learning communities in business . The American Behavioral Scientist, 2000, 43(8), 1262-1285.
34.
Grant, J.H. & Gnyawali, D.R.Strategic process improvement through organizational learning. Strategy & Leadership, 1996, 24(3), 28-34.
35.
Griffey, S.Conceptual frameworks beyond the learning organization . The Learning Organization, 1998, 5(2), 1-7.
36.
Handy, C.Managing the dream. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds), Learning Organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press, 1995.
Janis, I.L.Groupthink. In H.J. Leavitt, L.R. Pondy & D.M. Boje (Eds.), Readings in managerial psychology, 4th edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 439-450.
41.
Jermier, J.M.Introduction: Critical perspectives on organizational control . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(2), 235-256.
42.
Knights, D. & Morgan, G.Organization theory and consumption in a post-modern era. Organization Studies, 1993, 14(2), 11-34.
43.
Kofman, F. & Senge, P.M.Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds), Learning organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press, 1995.
44.
Lembke, S. & Wilson, M.G.Putting the ‘team’ into teamwork: Alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice. Human Relations, 1998, 51(7), 927-945.
45.
Marsick, V.J. & Watkins, K.E.Looking again at learning in the learning organization: A tool that can turn into a weapon!The Learning Organization, 1999, 6(5), 207-211.
46.
McHugh, D. , Groves, D. & Alker, A.Managing learning: What do we learn from a learning organization?The Learning Organization, 1998, 5(5), 1-14.
47.
McKinley, W. , Mone, M.A. & Barker III, V.L.Some ideological foundations of organizational downsizing. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1998, 7(3), 198-212.
Nicolini, D. & Meznar, M.B.The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 1995, 48(7), 727-747.
54.
Pedler, M. , Burgoyne, J. & Boydell, T.The learning company: A strategy for sustainable development, 2nd edn.London: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
55.
Popper, M. & Lipshitz, R.Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1998, 34(2), 61-179.
56.
Reynolds, M.Bright lights and the pastoral idyll . Management Learning, 2000, 31(1), 67-81.
57.
Rifkin, W. & Fulop, L.A review and case study on learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 1997, 4(4), 1-17.
58.
Schein, E.H.Empowerment, coercive persuasion and organizational learning: Do they connect?The Learning Organization, 1999, 6(4), 163-172.
59.
Senge, P.M.The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday, 1990.
60.
Senge, P.M. , Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R.B. & Smith, B.J.The fifth discipline fieldbook. New York: Doubleday, 1994.
61.
Smith, P.A.C. & Tosey, P.Assessing the learning organization: Part 1 - theoretical foundations. The Learning Organization, 1999, 6(2), 1-8.
62.
Snell, R.Experiential learning at work: Why can’t it be painless?Personnel Review, 1992, 21(4), 12-26.
63.
Snell, R. & Chak, A.M.The learning organization: Learning and empowerment for whom?Management Learning, 1998, 29(3), 337-364.
64.
Starkey, K.The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively . Human Relations, 1998, 51(4), 531-547.
65.
Tran, V.The role of emotional climate in learning organizations . The Learning Organization, 1998, 5(2), 1-7.
66.
Virany, B. , Tushman, M.L. & Romanelli, E.Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 1992, 3(1), 72-91.
