In order to survive, the contemporary organization must quickly adapt to its ever-changing markets and environment. The methods of structural control associated with the bureaucratic organizational form impede such adaptation. As a result, organizations are supplanting structural control with newer means of control - the control of ideas. Drawing on and extending social accounts theory, the authors explore how social accounts are used as one method to help to gain control of ideas, lessening management’s dependence on bureaucratic structures. The article exemplifies the managerial use of social accounts by reviewing the text of a videotape used by one organization in its attempt to influence workers’ ideas about management, unions and their own interests in order to keep the organization union free. The authors conclude with a discussion of how managerial uses of social accounts can be resisted by workers.
Adams, J.S.Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 267-299.
2.
Agger, B.Critical theory, post structuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance . Annual Review of Sociology, 1991, 17, 105-131.
3.
Allen, R. , Madison, D., Porter, L., Renwick, P. & Mayes, B.Organizational politics: Tactics and personal characteristics of political actors. California Management Review, 1979, 22, 77-83.
4.
Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H.Critical theory and management studies. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992, 1-20.
5.
Antaki, C. (Ed.) Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. London: Sage, 1988.
6.
Arnold, S. & Fisher, E.Hermeneutics and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1994, 21, 55-70
7.
Ashforth, B.E. & Lee, R.T.Defensive behavior in organizations: A preliminary model. Human Relations, 1990, 43, 621-648.
8.
Associated Press . Bonuses draw anger at U.S. Airways. The Roanoke Times, 1999, 20May.
9.
Astley, W.G. & Zammuto, R.Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 1992, 3, 443-466.
10.
Barker, J.R.Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 408-437.
11.
Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S.Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14, 23-46.
12.
Bendix, R.Work and authority in industry. New York: Wiley, 1956.
13.
Bies, R.J.The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 9. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987, pp. 289-319.
14.
Bies, R.J. , Cobb, A.T. & Wooten, K.Accounting for change: The language of leadership. Boston, MA: Academy of Management, August 1997.
15.
Bies, R.J. & Moag, J.S.Interactional justice: Communications criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard and M. Bazerman (Eds), Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 43-55.
16.
Bies, R.J. & Shapiro, D.L.Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1987, 1, 199-218.
17.
Bies, R.J. , Shapiro, D.L. & Cummings, L.L.Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it’s not my fault?Communications Research, 1988, 15, 381-399.
18.
Bourdieu, P.Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
19.
Braverman, H.Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.
20.
Brockner, J.The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research theory, and practice. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988, pp. 213-255.
21.
Brockner, J. & Greenberg, J.The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990, pp. 45-75.
22.
Brockner, J. , Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, Folger, R., Martin, C. & Bies, R.Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37, 397-409.
23.
Brown, A.Narcissism, identity and legitimacy . Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(3), 643-686.
24.
Brown, A. & Jones, M.Honourable members and dishonourable deeds: Sensemaking, impression management and legitimation in the ‘Arms to Iraq Affair’. Human Relations, 2000, 53(5), 655-691.
25.
Burns, T. & Stalker, G.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.
26.
Clegg, S.Frameworks of power. London: Sage, 1989.
27.
Cobb, A.T. & Frey, F.The effects of leader fairness and pay outcomes on superior/subordinate relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996, 26, 1401-1426.
28.
Cobb, A.T. & Wooten, K.The role social accounts can play in a ‘justice intervention’. In R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (Eds), Research in organizational change and development, Vol. 11. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1998, pp. 73-115.
29.
Cobb, A.T. , Wooten, K. & Folger, R.The role of organizational justice in the management of planned organizational change. In R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (Eds), Research in organizational change and development, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1995, 243-295
30.
Cohen, J. , Hazelrigg, L. & Pope, W.De-Parsonizing Weber: A critique of Parson’s interpretation of Weber’s sociology. American Sociological Review, 1975, 40, 229-241.
31.
Covaleski, M. , Dirsmith, M., Heian, J. & Samuel, S.The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggle over identity in Big Six accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 293-327.
32.
Deetz, S.Disciplinary power in the modern corporation. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992, pp. 21-45.
33.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y.Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
34.
Dess, G. , Rasheed, A., McLaughlin, K. & Priem, R.The new corporate architecture. Academy of Management Executive, 1995, 9, 7-20.
35.
Deutsch, M.Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.
36.
Du Gay, P.Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage, 1996.
37.
Elsbach, K.Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39, 57-88.
38.
Ezzamel, M. & Willmott, H.Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 358-396.
39.
Fiske, S. & Taylor, S.Social cognition. New York: Random House, 1984.
40.
Folger, R.Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J.D. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993, pp. 161-183.
41.
Folger, R. & Greenberg, J.Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland and G. Ferris (Eds), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985, pp. 141-183.
42.
Folger, R. & Konovsky, M.Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(1), 115-130.
43.
Folger, R. , McCline, R. & McDannell, J.What makes you think this policy is fair? Presented in Social accounts as weapons in the construction of ‘truth’ and battle for commitment in organizations. Academy of Management meetings, Dallas, TX, 1994.
44.
Foucault, M.Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
45.
Forester, J.Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.
46.
Forester, J.Critical ethnography: On fieldwork in a Habermasian way. In M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (Eds), Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992, pp. 46-65.
47.
Frey, F. The management of justice through accounts: Constructing acceptable justifications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech, 1997.
48.
Frey, F. & Cobb, A.T.What constitutes an ‘acceptable’ social account? An investigation of content and source factors. Presented at the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, 1999.
49.
Giacalone, R.A. & Pollard, H.G. (1988). Acceptance of managerial accounts for unethical supervisory behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1988, 130, 103-109.
50.
Giacalone, R.A. & Rosenfeld, P. (Eds) Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
51.
Gilbert, D.The twilight of corporate strategy: A comparative ethical critique. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
52.
Goffman, E.On cooling out the mark: Some aspects of adaptation to failure . Psychiatry, 1952, 15, 451-463.
53.
Goldman, A.Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
54.
Goldman, P. & Van Houten, D.Managerial strategies and the worker: A Marxist analysis of bureaucracy. Sociological Quarterly, 1977, 18, 108-125.
55.
Greenberg, J.Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990a, pp. 111-157.
56.
Greenberg, J.Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990b, 75, 561-568.
57.
Habermas, J.The theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984.
58.
Hall, R.Organizational behavior: A sociological perspective. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 84-95.
59.
Heritage, J.C.Conversation analysis: Methodological aspects. In U.M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995, pp. 391-418.
60.
Higgins, R.L. & Snyder, C.R. (1989) The business of excuses. In R. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld (Eds), Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
61.
Hirschman, A.O.Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
62.
Ilinitch, A. , Lewin, A. & D’Aveni, R.Managing in times of disorder: Hypercompetitive organizational responses. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
63.
Jermier, J.Introduction: Critical perspectives on organizational control . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 235-256.
64.
Jermier, J. , Knights, D. & Nord, W. (Eds) Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge, 1994.
65.
Jermier, J. , Slocum, J., Fry, L. & Gaines, J.Resistance behind the myth and façade of an official culture. Organization Science, 1991, 2, 170-194.
66.
Keeley, M.A social-contract theory of organizations. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1988.
67.
Kerr, S. & Jermier, J.Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22, 374-403.
68.
Knights, D. & Willmott, H. (Eds) Labour process theory. London: Macmillan, 1990.
69.
Konovsky, M.A. & Folger, R.The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims’ layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1991, 21, 630-650.
70.
Kunda, G.Ritual and the management of corporate culture: A critical perspective . Presented at the 8th International Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism. Copenhagen, June 1991.
71.
Lawrence, P. & Lorsch, J.Organizations and environments: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Graduate School of Management, Harvard University, 1967.
72.
Levitt, M. & Conrow, T.Confessions of a union buster. New York: Crown, 1993.
73.
Lewin, A. & Stephens, C.Designing postindustrial organizations. In G. Huber and W. Glick (Eds), Organizational change and redesign. New York: Oxford, 1994, pp. 393-409.
74.
Lind, E.A. , Kanfer, R. & Earley, P.C.Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59, 952-959.
75.
Lind, E.A. & Tyler, T.R.The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
76.
Louis, M.Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 226-251.
77.
Lukes, S.Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan, 1974.
78.
Mangham, I.L. & Overington, M.A.Organisations as theatre: A social psychology of dramatic appearances. Chichester: Wiley, 1987.
79.
March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P.Attention and the ambiguity of self-interest. In J.G. March and J.P. Olsen (Eds), Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976, pp. 38-53.
McFarlin, Dean B. & Sweeney, Paul D.Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35 (August), 626-637.
82.
Morrow, R.A. with Brown, D.D.Critical theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
83.
Near, J. & Miceli, M.Effective whistle blowing. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, 679-708.
84.
Oakes, L. , Townley, B. & Cooper, D.Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 257-292.
85.
Parsons, T.The theory of social and economic organization, trans. from M. Weber. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1947.
86.
Petty, R.M. & Cacioppo, J.T.The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 19. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1986, pp. 123-205.
87.
Phillips, N. & Brown, J.Analyzing communication in and around organizations: A critical hermeneutic approach. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(6), 1547-1576.
88.
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M.Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage, 1987.
89.
Rawls, J.A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
90.
Rosenfeld, P. , Giacalone, R.A. & Riordan, C.A.Impression management in organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. London: Routledge, 1995.
91.
Ricoeur, P.Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
92.
Sacks, H. & Schlegoff, E.Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Prathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 1979.
93.
Satow, R.Value-rational authority and professional organizations: Weber’s missing type . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1975, 20, 526-531.
Schlenker, B.R. & Weigold, M.F.Self-identification and accountability. In R. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds), Impression management in the organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
96.
Schönbach, P.Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
97.
Scott, W. & Hart, D.Organizational values in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1989.
Sewell, G.The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43, 397-428.
100.
Shapiro, D.The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36, 614-630.
101.
Shapiro, D.L. , Buttner, E.H. & Barry, B.Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, 58(3), 346-348.
102.
Shapiro, D. , Houghton, S., Kesner, I. & Robinson, R.Accounts as informal influence tactics: A conceptual model and propositions. Presented in Social accounts as weapons in the construction of ‘truth’ and battle for commitment in organizations. Academy of Management meetings, Dallas, TX, 1994.
103.
Simon, H.Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1948.
104.
Sitkin, S.B. & Bies, R.J.Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict. Human Relations, 1993, 46, 349-370.
105.
Stephens, C. & Cobb, A.T.Justice in organizational change: A synthesis of the technical and philosophical perspectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, 12, 21-34.
106.
Stephens, C. , D’Intino, R. & Victor, B.The moral quandary of transformational leadership: Change for whom? In R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (Eds), Research in organizational change and development, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1995, pp. 123-143.
107.
Stephens, C. & Victor, B.Accounts: Weapons and tools for whom? Presented in Social accounts as weapons in the construction of ‘truth’ and battle for commitment in organizations. Academy of Management meetings, Dallas, TX, 1994.
108.
Strauss, A.Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 1978.
109.
Therborn, G.The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Verso, 1980.
110.
Thibaut, J. & Walker, L.Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.
111.
Thompson, J.Critical hermeneutics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
112.
Thompson, J.Ideology and modern culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.
113.
Tyler, T. & Bies, R.Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990, pp. 77-98.
114.
Tyler, T.R. & Lind, E.A.A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25. New York: Academic Press, 1992.
115.
Victor, B. & Stephens, C.The dark side of the new organizational forms. Organizational Science, 1994, 5(4), 577-601.
116.
Watson, G.The symbolic construction of organizational justice. Working paper, St John’s University, College of Business, Jamaica, NY, 1999.
117.
Weber, M.Economy and society, ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978[1910].
118.
Weick, K.Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
119.
Weiss, R.Weber on bureaucracy: Management consultant or political theorist?Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 242-248.
120.
Willmott, H.Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations . Journal of Management Studies, 1993, 30, 515-552.
121.
Wooffitt, R.Analysing accounts. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 287-305.
