When is Criticism Not Constructive? The Roles of Fairness Perceptions and Dispositional Attributions in Employee Acceptance of Critical Supervisory Feedback
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2001
When is Criticism Not Constructive? The Roles of Fairness Perceptions and Dispositional Attributions in Employee Acceptance of Critical Supervisory Feedback
The effects of justice and dispositional attribution on reactions to negative supervisory feedback were examined in two studies. Study 1 showed that criticism delivered with greater interpersonal fairness resulted in more favourable dispositional attributions about the supervisor, more acceptance of the feedback, and more favourable reactions towards the superior and the organization. The beneficial influence of just interpersonal treatment was general across various feedback contexts, although the magnitude varied. Study 2 clarified the causal ordering: just interpersonal treatment reduced negative dispositional attribution, which in turn increased feedback acceptance and improved attitudes towards the supervisor. Study 2 also distinguished the consequences of perceived fairness in the formal procedures applied to forming the feedback, as opposed to interpersonal treatment during its delivery.
Argyris, C.Strategy, change and defensive routines. Belmont, CA: Pitman, 1985.
2.
Argyris, C.Teaching smart people how to learn . Harvard Business Review, 1991, May-June, 69, 99-109.
3.
Arkin, R.M.Self-presentation styles. In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 311-333.
4.
Ashford, S.J. & Northcraft, G.B.Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression-management in feedback-seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992, 53, 310-334.
5.
Baron, R.A.Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993, pp. 155-170.
6.
Bass, B.M.Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press, 1985.
7.
Bies, R.J. & Moag, J.S.Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard & M.H. Bazerman (Eds), Research on negotiation in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 43-55.
8.
Bond, M.H. , Wan, K.C., Leung, K. & Giacalone, R.How are responses to verbal insults related to cultural collectivism and power distance?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1985, 16, 111-127.
9.
Brockner, J. , Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M.J., Francesco, A.M., Chen, Z.X., Leung, K., Bierbrauer, G., Gomez, C., Kirkman, B.L. & Shapiro, D.Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2000.
10.
Brockner, J. & Wiesenfeld, B.An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 120, 189-208.
11.
Cropanzano, R.Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resources management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
12.
Eddy, E.R. , Stone, D.L., & Stone-Romero, E.F.The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 1999, 52, 335-358.
13.
Fedor, D.B. , Eder, R.W. & Buckley, M.R.The contributory effects of supervisory intentions on subordinate feedback responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 44, 396-414.
14.
Folger, R. & Konovsky, M.A.Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32, 115-130.
15.
Greenberg, J.Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79, 288-297.
16.
Hofstede, G.Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
17.
Hom, P.W. & Griffeth, R.W.Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross- sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 76, 350-366.
18.
Ilgen, D.R. , Fisher, C.D. & Taylor, M.S.Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64, 349-371.
19.
Ilgen, D.R. , Mitchell, T.R. & Fredrickson, J.W.Poor performers: Supervisors’ and subordinates’ responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1981, 27, 386-410.
20.
Kelley, H.H.Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 15. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967, pp. 192-238.
21.
Kelley, H.H.Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (Eds), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972, pp. 151-174.
22.
Kluger, A.N. & DeNisi, A.The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119, 254-284.
23.
Larson, J.R.The dynamic interplay between employees’ feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors’ delivery of performance feedback . Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 408-422.
24.
Leung, K. , Au, Y.F. & Chiu, W.H.Sympathy and support for industrial actions: A justice analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78, 781-787.
25.
Leung, K. & Li, W.K.Psychological mechanisms of process control effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75, 613-620.
26.
Leung, K. , Smith, P.B., Wang, Z.M. & Sun, H.F.Job satisfaction in joint venture hotels in China: An organizational justice analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 1996, 27, 947-962.
27.
Lind, E.A. , Kanfer, R. & Earley, P.C.Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59, 952-959.
28.
Lind, E.A. , Kulik, C.T., Ambrose, M. & de Vera Park, M.V.Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38, 224-251.
29.
Lind, E.A. & Tyler, T.R.The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
30.
Lissack, R.I. & Sheppard, B.H.Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute resolution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1983, 13, 45-65.
31.
McClure, J.Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74, 7-20.
32.
Messick, D.M. , Bloom, S., Boldizar, J.P. & Samuelson, C.D.Why are we fairer than others?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1985, 21, 480-500.
33.
Moorman, R.H.Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76, 845-855.
34.
Morris, M.W. & Larrick, R.P.When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review, 1995, 102, 331-355.
35.
Morris, M.W. , Larrick, R.P. & Su, S.K.Misperceiving negotiation counterparts: When situationally determined bargaining behaviors are attributed to personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 77, 52-67.
36.
Mowday, R.T. , Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W.The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 1979, 14, 224-247.
37.
Podsakoff, P.M. , Mackenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R.Transformational leader behavior and their effects on trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 1990, 1, 107-142.
38.
Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z.Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House, 1986.
39.
Robinson, J.R. , Shaver, P.R. & Wrightsman, L.S.Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1991.
40.
Ross, L.The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 174-221.
41.
Shapiro, D.L. , Trevino, L.K. & Victor, B.Correlates of employee thefts: A multi-dimensional justice perspective. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1995, 6, 404-414.
42.
Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R.Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997, 82, 434-443.
43.
Snyder, C.R. & Newburg, C.L.The Barnum effect in a group setting. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1981, 45, 622-629.
44.
Thibaut, J. & Walker, L.Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.
45.
Tyler, T.R.What is procedural justice?Law and Society Review, 1988, 22, 301-335.
46.
Tyler, T.R. & Bies, R.J.Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990, pp. 77-98.
47.
Tyler, T.R. & Lind, E.A., Procedural justice. In V.L. Hamilton and J. Sanders (Eds), Handbook of justice research in law. New York: Plenum, 2001, pp. 65-92.
48.
Tyler, T.R. , Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H.J. & Huo, Y.J.Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1997.
49.
Uleman, J.S.Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inference . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13, 337-354.
