This study explores the relations between organizational spatiality, gender, and class. It examines the work performed by managers and architects on the one hand, and by various groups of female employees on the other, in constructing, reproducing, and challenging gender-class identities through space-related means. Three types of gender-class spatial work are identified―discursive, material, and interpretive-emotional―to highlight the role of space in constructing and reconstructing inequality regimes within organizations. Applying insights from Lefebvre’s spatial theory, we analyze the case of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ new headquarters, demonstrating how the spatial work of various actors is both gendered and gendering. We also show how space is enacted by women from different social groups in accordance with their habitus and with the aim of distinguishing themselves from others.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.
2.
AckerJ. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20, 441–464.
3.
AlvessonM.BillingY. D. (2009). Understanding gender and organizations. London: SAGE Publications.
4.
BaldryC. (1999). Space—The final frontier. Sociology, 33, 535–553.
5.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BrahA.PhoenixA. (2013). “Ain’t I a woman?” Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5, 75–86.
7.
BrittonD. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14, 418–434.
8.
BruniA.GherardiS.PoggioB. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work & Organization, 11, 406–429.
9.
CleggS.KornbergerM. (2006). Space, organizations and management theory. Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber.
10.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 3, 1241–1299.
11.
DaleK.BurrellG. (2008). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
13.
DouglasM. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14.
ElsbachK. D. (2004). Interpreting workplace identities: The role of office décor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 99–128.
15.
ElsbachK. D.PrattM. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224.
16.
ElyR. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589–634.
17.
ElyR. J.MeyersonD. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.
18.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and power. New York: Pantheon.
19.
GagliardiP. (1990). Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
20.
GherardiS. (1994). The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organizational lives. Human Relations, 47, 591–610.
21.
GherardiS.NicoliniD.StratiA. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14, 315–329.
22.
GilboaS.RafaeliA. (2003). Store environment, emotions and approach behaviour: applying environmental aesthetics to retailing. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13, 195–211.
23.
GrayB.Kish-GephartJ. (2013). Encountering social class differences at work: How “class work” perpetuates inequality. Academy of Management Review, 38, 670–699.
24.
GroszE. A. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on virtual and real space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
GuillénM. F. (1997). Scientific management’s lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the Taylorized beauty of the mechanical. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 682–715.
26.
HalfordS.LeonardP. (2006). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27, 657–676.
27.
HancockA. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 63–79.
28.
HancockP.SpicerA. (2011). Academic architecture and the constitution of the new model worker. Culture and Organization, 17, 91–105.
29.
HancockP.TylerM. (2000). The look of love, gender and the organization of aesthetics. In HassardJ.HollidayR.WillmottH. (Eds.), Body and organization (pp.108–129). London: SAGE Publications.
30.
HancockP.TylerM. (2007). Un/doing gender and the aesthetics of organizational performance. Gender, Work & Organization, 14, 512–533.
31.
HardingN. (2002). On the manager’s body as an aesthetics of control. Tamara: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 2, 63–76.
32.
HarveyD. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
HofbauerJ. (2000). Bodies in landscape: On office design and organization. In HassardJ.HollidayR.WillmottH. (Eds.), Body and organization (pp. 166–191). London: SAGE Publications.
34.
HolvinoE. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 17, 248–277.
35.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
36.
LefebvreH. (1974/1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37.
LinsteadS.HopflH. (2000). The aesthetics of organization. London: SAGE Publications.
38.
MarkusT. A. (1993). Buildings and power. London: Routledge.
39.
MartinP. Y. (2006). Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 254–276.
40.
MinahanS.CoxJ. W. (2007). The aesthetic turn in management. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
41.
NeumanI. B. (2005). To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 72–93.
42.
ÖzbilginM. F.BeauregardT. A.TatliA.BellM. P. (2011). Work-life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 177–198.
43.
PoggioB. (2006). Editorial: Outline of a theory of gender practices. Gender, Work & Organization, 13, 225–233.
44.
RosenM.OrlikowskiW. J.SchmahmannK. S. (1990). Building buildings and living lives: A critique of bureaucracy, ideology and concrete artifacts. In GagliardiP. (Ed.), Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape (pp. 69–84). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
45.
ShieldsS. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.
46.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20–24.
47.
SpainD. (1992). Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
48.
SpicerA.TaylorS. (2006). The struggle for organizational space. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 2–27.
49.
StratiA. (1999). Organization and aesthetics. London: SAGE Publications.
50.
StyhreA.Eriksson-ZetterquistU. (2008). Thinking the multiple in gender and diversity studies: Examining the concept the intersectionality. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23, 567–582.
51.
TaylorS. S.HansenH. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1211–1231.
TylerM.CohenL. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31, 175–198.
54.
WassermanV. (2012). Open spaces, closed boundaries: Transparent workspaces as clerical female ghettos. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5, 6–25.
55.
WassermanV.FrenkelM. (2011). Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22, 503–521.
56.
WatkinsC. (2005). Representations of space, spatial practices and spaces of representation: An application of Lefebvre’s spatial triad. Culture and Organization, 11, 209–220.
57.
YanowD. (1995). Built space as story: The policy stories that buildings tell. Policy Studies Journal, 23, 407–422.
58.
YanowD. (2006). Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach. In RafaeliA.PrattM. G. (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism (pp. 41–60). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
