Effects of Two Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons on Muscle Activity,Energy Expenditure,and Subjective Assessments During Repetitive Lifting

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of two different passive back-support exoskeleton (BSE) designs during repetitive lifting in different postures.

Background

Although BSEs have been proposed as a potential intervention for reducing physical demands, limited information is available about the impacts of different exoskeleton designs in diverse work scenarios.

Method

Eighteen participants (gender-balanced) performed lab-based simulations of repetitive lifting tasks. These tasks were performed in 12 different conditions, involving two BSEs and a control condition, two levels of lifting symmetry (symmetric and asymmetric), and two postures (standing and kneeling). Outcome measures described muscle activity and energy expenditure, along with perceived discomfort, balance, and usability.

Results

Using both BSEs significantly reduced peak activity of the trunk extensor muscles (by ~10%–28%) and energy expenditure (by ~4%–13%) in all conditions tested. Such reductions, though, were task dependent and differed between the two BSEs. In most of the tested conditions, using BSEs positively affected subjective responses regarding perceived exertion and usability.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of a BSE are task specific and depend on the specific BSE design approach. More work is needed, though, to better characterize this task specificity and to determine the generalizability of BSE effects on objective and subjective outcomes for a wider range of conditions and users.

Application

Our results provide new evidence to guide the selection and application of passive BSE designs in diverse lifting tasks.

Keywords

exoskeleton usability wearable technology electromyography metabolic demand asymmetric lifting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdoli-E

Agnew

M. J.

Stevenson

J. M

. (2006). An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks. Clinical Biomechanics, 21, 456–465.doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.021

Abdoli-E

Stevenson

J. M

. (2008). The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting. Clinical Biomechanics, 23, 372–380.doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.012

Alemi

M. M

. (2019). Biomechanical assessment and metabolic evaluation of passive lift-assistive exoskeletons during repetitive lifting tasks [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Tech.

Alemi

M. M.

Geissinger

Simon

A. A.

Chang

S. E.

Asbeck

A. T

. (2019). A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 47, 25–34.doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.003

Alemi

M. M.

Simon

A. A.

Geissinger

Asbeck

. (submitted). Modeling metabolic reductions from a passive back-support exoskeleton.

Baltrusch

S. J.

van Dieën

J. H.

Bruijn

S. M.

Koopman

A. S.

van Bennekom

C. A. M.

Houdijk

. (2019). The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking. Ergonomics, 62, 903–916.

Bell

J. A.

Burnett

. (2009). Exercise for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of low back pain in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19, 8–24.doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9164-5

Bigos

S. J.

Holland

Webster

J. S.

Battie

Malmgren

J. A

. (2009). High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: Systematic literature review in working-age adults. The Spine Journal, 9, 147–168.doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.001

Bilzon

J. L.

Scarpello

E. G.

Smith

Ravenhill

N. A.

Rayson

M. P

. (2001). Characterization of the metabolic demands of simulated shipboard Royal Navy fire-fighting tasks. Ergonomics, 44, 766–780.doi:10.1080/00140130118253

10.

BLS . (2017). 2016 survey of occupational injuries and illnesses charts package. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/osch0060.pdf.

11.

BLS . (2018). Table 2. Number, incidence rate, and median days away from work for nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work for musculoskeletal disorders by part of body and ownership, National 2016. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/msd_cd_r2_00_2016.xlsx.

12.

Borg

. (1990). Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 16, 55–58.doi:10.5271/sjweh.1815

13.

Bosch

van Eck

Knitel

de Looze

. (2016). The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Applied Ergonomics, 54, 212–217.doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003

14.

Brockway

J. M

. (1987). Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. Human Nutrition. Clinical Nutrition, 41, 463–471.

15.

Clemes

S. A.

Haslam

C. O.

Haslam

R. A

. (2010). What constitutes effective manual handling training? A systematic review. Occupational Medicine, 60, 101–107.doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp127

16.

Cram

J. R.

Criswell

. (2011). Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography, 2nd edition. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43, 1378.

17.

da Costa

B. R.

Vieira

E. R

. (2009). Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 60, 285–323.doi:10.1002/ajim.20750

18.

de Looze

M. P.

Bosch

Krause

Stadler

K. S.

O’Sullivan

L. W

. (2016). Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics, 59, 671–681.doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988

19.

Dempsey

P. G.

Ciriello

V. M.

Maikala

O’Brien

. (2008). Oxygen consumption prediction models for individual and combination materials handling tasks. Ergonomics, 51, 1776–1789.doi:10.1080/00140130802331625

20.

Duffield

Dawson

Pinnington

H. C.

Wong

. (2004). Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 7, 11–22.doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80039-2

21.

Fanello

Jousset

Roquelaure

Chotard-Frampas

Delbos

. (2002). Evaluation of a training program for the prevention of lower back pain among hospital employees. Nursing and Health Sciences, 4, 51–54.doi:10.1046/j.1442-2018.2002.00098.x

22.

Frost

D. M.

Abdoli-E

Stevenson

J. M

. (2009). PLAD (personal lift assistive device) stiffness affects the lumbar flexion/extension moment and the posterior chain EMG during symmetrical lifting tasks. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 19, e403–e412.doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.12.002

23.

Gatty

C. M.

Turner

Buitendorp

D. J.

Batman

. (2003). The effectiveness of back pain and injury prevention programs in the workplace. Work, 20, 257–266.

24.

Gebhardt

W. A

. (1994). Effectiveness of training to prevent job-related back pain: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 571–574.doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01153.x

25.

Hausswirth

Bigard

Le Chevalier

. (1997). The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28, 449–453.doi:10.1055/s-2007-972662

26.

Hermens

H. J.

Merletti

Freriks

. (1996, September 6–7). European activities on surface electromyography [Conference session]. Proceedings of the First General SENIAM (Surface EMG for Non Invasive Assessment of Muscles) Workshop, Torino, Italy.

27.

Hignett

. (2003). Intervention strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries associated with handling patients: A systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60, 6e–6.doi:10.1136/oem.60.9.e6

28.

Jia

Kim

Nussbaum

M. A

. (2011). An EMG-based model to estimate lumbar muscle forces and spinal loads during complex, high-effort tasks: Development and application to residential construction using prefabricated walls. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41, 437–446.doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.03.004

29.

Koopman

A. S.

Kingma

Faber

G. S.

de Looze

M. P.

van Dieën

J. H

. (2019). Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. Journal of Biomechanics, 83, 97–103.doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.033

30.

Kuijt-Evers

L. F. M.

Bosch

Huysmans

M. A.

de Looze

M. P.

Vink

. (2007). Association between objective and subjective measurements of comfort and discomfort in hand tools. Applied Ergonomics, 38, 643–654.doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.004

31.

Lahad

. (1994). The effectiveness of four interventions for the prevention of low back pain. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1286.doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520160070046

32.

Lamers

E. P.

Yang

A. J.

Zelik

K. E

. (2018). Feasibility of a biomechanically-assistive garment to reduce low back loading during leaning and lifting. IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering, 65, 1674–1680.doi:10.1109/TBME.2017.2761455

33.

Lee

Kim

Han

. (2012). The technical trend of the exoskeleton robot system for human power assistance. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13, 1491–1497.doi:10.1007/s12541-012-0197-x

34.

Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety . (2018). 2018 Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index. https://business.libertymutualgroup.com/business-insurance/Documents/Services/Workplace%20Safety%20Index.pdf

35.

Lotz

C. A.

Agnew

M. J.

Godwin

A. A.

Stevenson

J. M

. (2009). The effect of an on-body personal lift assist device (PLAD) on fatigue during a repetitive lifting task. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 19, 331–340.doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.08.006

36.

Madinei

Ning

. (2018). Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding. Ergonomics, 61, 831–838.doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1387675

37.

Maher

C. G

. (2000). A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 46, 259–269.doi:10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60287-7

38.

Marras

W. S.

Mirka

G. A

. (1993). Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low-level trunk acceleration. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 11, 811–817.doi:10.1002/jor.1100110606

39.

Rashedi

Kim

Nussbaum

M. A.

Agnew

M. J

. (2014). Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work. Ergonomics, 57, 1864–1874.doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.952682

40.

Schieppati

Tacchini

Nardone

Tarantola

Corna

. (1999). Subjective perception of body sway. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry , 66, 313–322.doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.3.313

41.

Schrack

J. A.

Simonsick

E. M.

Ferrucci

. (2010). Comparison of the Cosmed K4b(2) portable metabolic system in measuring steady-state walking energy expenditure. PLoS ONE, 5, e9292.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009292

42.

Steffens

Maher

C. G.

Pereira

L. S. M.

Stevens

M. L.

Oliveira

V. C.

Chapple

Teixeira-Salmela

L. F.

Hancock

M. J

. (2016). Prevention of low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176, 199–208.doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7431

43.

St-Vincent

Tellier

Lortte

. (1989). Training in handling: An evaluative study. Ergonomics, 32, 191–210.doi:10.1080/00140138908966079

44.

Wang

Dai

Ning

. (2015). Risk assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in construction: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141, 04015008.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000979

45.

Whitfield

B. H.

Costigan

P. A.

Stevenson

J. M.

Smallman

C. L

. (2014). Effect of an on-body ergonomic aid on oxygen consumption during a repetitive lifting task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44, 39–44.doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2013.10.002

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.86 MB