Upper Extremity Muscle Activity During In-Phase and Anti-Phase Continuous Pushing Tasks

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the effect of anti-phase, in-phase bimanual and unimanual simulated industrial pushing tasks and frequency on upper extremity muscle activity.

Background:

Research investigating symmetrical (in-phase) and asymmetrical (anti-phase) pushing exertions is limited despite a high prevalence in industry.

Methods:

Fifteen female participants completed five pushing tasks using a dual handle apparatus at three frequencies: 15 cycles per minute (cpm), 30 cpm, and self-selected. Tasks included two bimanual symmetrical pushes (constrained and unconstrained), two bimanual asymmetrical pushes (reciprocating and continuous), and one right unimanual push. Surface electromyography (EMG) from the right anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid (AD, MD, and PD); right and left trapezius (RT and LT); right pectoralis major (PM); and right and left external obliques (REO and LEO) was collected and normalized to maximum voluntary effort.

Results:

There was a task by frequency interaction in the AD, MD, PD, and RT (p < .005), where activity in AD, MD, and PD was highest in the continuous task at 15 cpm, but activity was similar across task in 30 cpm and self-selected. Muscle activity coefficient of variation was lowest during continuous task across all frequencies.

Conclusion:

Continuous, anti-phase pushes and constrained, in-phase pushes had the highest muscle activity demands and the least amount of variability in muscle activity and therefore may present the greatest risk of injury.

Application:

Anti-phase pushing is known to have a greater cognitive demand, and this study demonstrated that it also has a greater physical demand when performed continuously.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allread

W. G.

Marras

W. S.

Burr

D. L.

(2000). Measuring trunk motions in industry: Variability due to task factors, individual differences, and the amount of data collected. Ergonomics, 43(6), 691–701.

Baril-Gingras

Lortie

(1995). The handling of objects other than boxes: Univariate analysis of handling techniques in a large transport company. Ergonomics, 38(5), 905–925.

Brinkman

Porter

(1979). Supplementary motor area in the monkey: Activity of neurons during performance of a learned motor task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 42(3), 681–709.

Hodder

J. N.

Keir

P. J.

(2013). Obtaining maximum muscle excitation for normalizing shoulder electromyography in dynamic contractions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23(5), 1166–1173.

Hoozemans

M. J. M.

Knelange

E. B.

Frings-Dresen

M. H. W.

Veeger

H. E. J.

Kuijer

P. P. F. M.

(2014). Are pushing and pulling work-related risk factors for upper extremity symptoms? A systematic review of observational studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 71(11), 788–795.

Hoozemans

M. J. M.

Van der Beek

A. J.

Frings-Dresen

M. H. W.

Van der Woude

L. H. V.

Van Dijk

F. J. H.

(2002). Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(10), 696–702.

Keir

P. J.

Brown

M. M.

(2012). Force, frequency and gripping alter upper extremity muscle activity during a cyclic push task. Ergonomics, 55(7), 813–824.

Kelly

B. T.

Williams

R. J.

Cordasco

F. A.

Backus

S. I.

Otis

J. C.

Weiland

D. E.

Warren

R. F.

(2005). Differential patterns of muscle activation in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14(2), 165–171.

Kelso

J. A.

(1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. The American Journal of Physiology, 246(6 Pt 2), R1000–R1004.

10.

Kilbom

Å.

Persson

(1987). Work technique and its consequences for musculoskeletal disorders. Ergonomics, 30(2), 273–279.

11.

Danion

Latash

M. L.

Z-M.

Zatsiorsky

V. M.

(2000). Characteristics of finger force production during one- and two-hand tasks. Human Movement Science, 19(6), 897–923.

12.

Madeleine

Mathiassen

S. E.

Arendt-Nielsen

(2008). Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck-shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement. Experimental Brain Research, 185(4), 689–698.

13.

Madeleine

Voigt

Mathiassen

S. E.

(2008). The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task. Ergonomics, 51(7), 1078–1095.

14.

Perotto

Delagi

E. F.

(2011). Anatomical guide for the electromyographer: The limbs and trunk. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

15.

Swinnen

S. P.

Jardin

Verschueren

Meulenbroek

Franz

Dounskaia

Walter

C. B.

(1998). Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: Effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behavioural Brain Research, 90(1), 79–87.

16.

Taniguchi

Burle

Vidal

Bonnet

(2001). Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses. Experimental Brain Research, 137(3–4), 259–268.

17.

Temprado

J. J.

Swinnen

S. P.

Carson

R. G.

Tourment

Laurent

(2003). Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Human Movement Science, 22(3), 339–363.

18.

Veiersted

K. B.

Westgaard

R. H.

Andersen

(1990). Pattern of muscle activity during stereotyped work and its relation to muscle pain. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 62(1), 31–41.

19.

Westenberg

Smits-Engelsman

B. C. M.

Duysens

(2004). Development of unimanual versus bimanual task performance in an isometric task. Human Movement Science, 23(3–4), 461–474.

20.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board of Ontario. (2015). By the numbers: 2014 WSIB statistical report, Schedule 2. Retrieved from http://www.wsibstatistics.ca/.

21.

Zijdewind

Kernell

(2001). Bilateral interactions during contractions of intrinsic hand muscles. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(5), 1907–1913.