Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Tobacco retailers have an important role to play in reducing access to tobacco among youth, but in the USA, their role has become more complicated because of recent developments in policies and industry, such as the Indiana Tobacco-21 law and the rising popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products. This study aimed to explore Indiana retailers’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills related to the prevention of underage sales of tobacco and ENDS products and identify retailers’ needs for further education and training.

Methods:

The study involved a secondary analysis of anonymous cross-sectional data from the 2020 Indiana Tobacco Compliance Survey conducted by the Indiana Division of Mental Health and Addiction (DMHA). Managers and owners of retail stores who sold tobacco or ENDS products (i.e., large corporate-owned stores and smaller venues such as tobacco shops, vapour shops, and convenience stores) were eligible for inclusion. Records of retailers’ tobacco certificates were utilised for random sampling. Subgroup comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests.

Results:

The survey sample (n = 102) included participants from all 10 DMHA planning regions in Indiana and all types of tobacco retail stores. Many retailers did not know about or understand the negative impacts of ENDS products on young people or existing regulations to minimise these impacts and the Indiana State Tobacco-21 law. Retailers in larger stores had a greater objective knowledge and reported more frequent prevention programme utilisation than smaller stores (e.g., by means of ‘We Card’).

Conclusions:

Underage tobacco sale prevention procedures varied significantly, but resources such as ‘We Card’ and ‘This is Our Watch’ were more popular than alternatives. Retailers reported a need for more convenient education and training options on how to check photo identification and refuse sales to minors.

Keywords

Programme utilisation tobacco control tobacco retailers training and education underage sales

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abouk

Adams

(2017) Compliance inspections of tobacco retailers and youth smoking. American Journal of Health Economics 3(1): 10–32.

Agaku

Nkosi

Agaku

, et al. (2022) A rapid evaluation of the US Federal Tobacco 21 (T21) Law and lessons from statewide T21 policies: Findings from population-level surveys. Preventing Chronic Disease 19: E29.

Ballotpedia (2021) Documenting Indiana’s path to recovery from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020–2021. Available at: https://ballotpedia.org/Documenting_Indiana%27s_path_to_recovery_from_the_coronavirus_(COVID-19)_pandemic,_2020-2021 (accessed 21 November 2021).

Berg

Solomon

Barkley

, et al. (2015) Tobacco taxes in the southeastern US states: Views from former legislators. Health Behavior and Policy Review 2(5): 333–342.

Biener

Nyman

Roman

, et al. (2001) Massachusetts adult tobacco survey: Tobacco use and attitudes after seven years of the Massachusetts tobacco control program: Technical report and tables 1993–2000. Report no 3. Technical report, Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, January.

Blackman

KCA

Smiley

Kintz

, et al. (2019) Retailers’ perceptions of FDA tobacco regulation authority. Tobacco Regulatory Science 5(3): 291–300.

Broadwater

Healy

Shear

, et al. (2020) Postal crisis ripples across nation as election looms. The New York Times, 15 August. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/us/post-office-vote-by-mail.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1991) Public attitudes regarding limits on public smoking and regulation of tobacco sales and advertising – 10 US communities, 1989. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 40(21): 344–353.

Clark

Natanblut

Schmitt

, et al. (2000) Factors associated with tobacco sales to minors: Lessons learned from the FDA compliance checks. JAMA 284(6): 729–734.

10.

DiFranza

(1999) Are the federal and state governments complying with the Synar Amendment? Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 153(10): 1089–1097.

11.

DiFranza

(2005) Best practices for enforcing state laws prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 11(6): 559–565.

12.

DiFranza

Dussault

(2005). The federal initiative to halt the sale of tobacco to children – The Synar Amendment, 1992–2000: Lessons learned. Tobacco Control 14(2): 93–98.

13.

DiFranza

Savageau

Bouchard

(2001) Is the standard compliance check protocol a valid measure of the accessibility of tobacco to underage smokers? Tobacco Control 10(3): 227–232.

14.

Doucet

Velicer

Laforge

(2007) Demographic differences in support for smoking policy interventions. Addictive Behaviors 32(1): 148–157.

15.

Duan

Romm

Henriksen

, et al. (2022) The impact of recent tobacco regulations and COVID-19 restrictions and implications for future e-cigarette retail: Perspectives from vape and vape-and-smoke shop merchants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(7): 3855.

16.

EasyMapMaker (2021) EasyMapMaker steps to create a custom Google map. Available at: https://www.easymapmaker.com/ (accessed 28 September 2020).

17.

Feng

Pesko

(2019) Revisiting the effects of tobacco retailer compliance inspections on youth tobacco use. American Journal of Health Economics 5(4): 509–532.

18.

Fix

O’Connor

Fong

, et al. (2011) Smokers’ reactions to FDA regulation of tobacco products: Findings from the 2009 ITC United States survey. BMC Public Health 11: 941.

19.

Gaiha

Lempert

Halpern-Felsher

(2020) Underage youth and young adult e-cigarette use and access before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Network Open 3(12): e2027572.

20.

IBM Corp. (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. 24.0 ed. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

21.

Jayawardene

Carter

Agley

, et al. (2019) HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake by advanced practice nurses: Interplay of agency, community and attitudinal factors. Journal of Advanced Nursing 75(11): 2559–2569.

22.

Jun

Gassman

Agley

, et al. (2020) Indiana Youth Survey – 2020. Bloomington IN: Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University.

23.

Kong

Henriksen

(2022) Retail endgame strategies: Reduce tobacco availability and visibility and promote health equity. Tobacco Control 31(2): 243–249.

24.

Lenk

Toomey

Shi

, et al. (2014) Do sources of cigarettes among adolescents vary by age over time? Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse 23(2): 137–143.

25.

Levinson

Lee

JGL

Jason

, et al. (2020) Asking for identification and retail tobacco sales to minors. Pediatrics 145(5): e20193253.

26.

Mamudu

Hammond

Glantz

(2008) Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Social Science & Medicine 67(11): 1690–1699.

27.

Meyerson

Dinh

Agley

, et al. (2019). Predicting pharmacist dispensing practices and comfort related to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP). AIDS and Behavior 23(7): 1925–1938.

28.

Pepper

Coats

Nonnemaker

, et al. (2019) How do adolescents get their e-cigarettes and other electronic vaping devices? American Journal of Health Promotion 33(3): 420–429.

29.

Reinert

Carver

Range

, et al. (2009) Retailers’ views of tobacco policy and law enforcement. Drugs-Education Prevention and Policy 16(3): 260–265.

30.

Roberts

Klein

Ferketich

, et al. (2021) Beyond strong enforcement: Understanding the factors related to retailer compliance with tobacco 21. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 23(12): 2084–2090.

31.

Rose

Emery

Ennett

, et al. (2015) Retailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: A survey of tobacco retailers. BMC Public Health 15(1): 884.

32.

Schumann

John

Thyrian

, et al. (2006) Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behavior. European Journal of Public Health 16(5): 513–519.

33.

Silver

Macinko

Giorgio

, et al. (2016) Retailer compliance with tobacco control laws in New York City before and after raising the minimum legal purchase age to 21. Tobacco Control 25(6): 624–627.

34.

Smiley

Shin

Rose

, et al. (2020) Perceptions of e-cigarettes and flavor restrictions among tobacco retailers in Los Angeles. American Journal of Health Behavior 44(6): 893–901.

35.

The We Card Program (2023) Available at: https://www.wecard.org/

36.

Tsai

Bluthenthal

Allem

, et al. (2016) Vape shop retailers’ perceptions of their customers, products and services: A content analysis. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation 2(Suppl): 3.

37.

US Food & Drug Administration (2023) This is our watch. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/retail-sales-tobacco-products/our-watch

38.

Velicer

Laforge

Levesque

, et al. (1994) The development and initial validation of the smoking policy inventory. Tobacco Control 3(4): 347–355.

39.

von Elm

Altman

Egger

, et al. (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61(4): 344–349.

40.

Vyas

Ling

Gordon

, et al. (2021). Compliance with San Francisco’s flavoured tobacco sales prohibition. Tobacco Control 30(2): 227–230.

41.

Winickoff

McMillen

Vallone

, et al. (2011) US attitudes about banning menthol in cigarettes: Results from a nationally representative survey. American Journal of Public Health 101(7): 1234–1236.

42.

Yang

Lee

(2018) A qualitative assessment of business perspectives and tactics of tobacco and vape shop retailers in three communities in Orange County, CA, 2015–2016. Archives of Public Health 76: 57.

43.

Escobedo

Garcia

, et al. (2018) A descriptive longitudinal study of changes in vape shop characteristics and store policies in anticipation of the 2016 FDA regulations of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(2): 313.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.58 MB

0.01 MB

Retailers’ perspectives on the prevention of underage tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery system sales

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material