Publications on tobacco control were quantitatively analysed to gain insight into the essential characteristics of the research field and trends and patterns in publication activities. The goal was to detect changes in the number of publications before and after the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) was introduced.
Study design:
A bibliometric analysis was performed to assess the current status and research themes of tobacco control papers listed in the Web of Science database published between 1990 and 2015.
Methods:
Quantitative analyses were conducted to investigate publication activities, geographic distribution and individuals’ research fields within tobacco control.
Results:
The number of publications on tobacco control was over 81 times higher in 2015 than in 1990. At least 50% of the papers were published by authors in high-income countries. In addition, in the first 5 years after the WHO FCTC was introduced, publications on tobacco control increased considerably and the first publications from authors from Malaysia and Uruguay appeared. Researchers from the Americas Region of WHO contributed to the field much more frequently than those from the other five WHO regions.
Conclusion:
Findings from this study suggest that researchers’ interest from most countries increased after the WHO FCTC was introduced. However, research outputs from low- and middle-income countries remained comparatively low. Promoting more interest in tobacco control among researchers in these countries may help control the future prevalence of smoking.
AbejonRGareaA (2015) A bibliometric analysis of research on arsenic in drinking water during the 1992–2012 period: An outlook to treatment alternatives for arsenic removal. Journal of Water Process Engineering6: 105–119.
2.
AsutOBalcıE (2014) Current situation and future needs in tobacco control research. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi23: 40–45.
3.
BascombeTMSScottKNBallardD. (2016) Primary healthcare provider knowledge, beliefs and clinic-based practices regarding alternative tobacco products and marijuana: A qualitative study. Health Education Research31: 375–383.
4.
ChapmanSDerrickG (2012) Bibliographic analysis of papers and authors published in Tobacco Control 1998–September2011. Tobacco Control21: 198–201.
5.
ChenY-CHuangH-WChengC-P. (2015) A path model of smoking behavior among senior high school students in Taiwan. Health Education Research75(1): 105–116.
6.
CohenJEChaitonMOPlaninacLC (2010) Taking stock: A bibliometric analysis of the focus of tobacco research from the 1980s to the 2000s. American Journal of Preventive Medicine39: 352–356.
7.
DaynardRA (2009) Doing the unthinkable (and saving millions of lives). Tobacco Control18: 2–3.
8.
De Granda-OriveJIAlonso-ArroyoAVillanueva SerranoSJ. (2011) Comparación entre dos quinquenios (1998/2002 y 2003/2007) de la producción, repercusión y colaboración en tabaquismo de autoresespañoles a través del Science Citation Index. Archivos de Bronconeumologia47: 25–34.
9.
DurmuşoğluA (2016) A pre-assessment of past research on the topic of environmental-friendly electronics. Journal of Cleaner Production129: 305–314.
10.
FengGJiangYLiQ. (2010) Individual-level factors associated with intentions to quit smoking among adult smokers in six cities of China: Findings from the ITC China Survey. Tobacco Control19: 6–11.
11.
GaoJChapmanSSunS. (2012) The growth in newspaper coverage of tobacco control in China, 2000–2010. BMC Public Health12: 160.
12.
García-LópezJA (1999) Bibliometric analysis of Spanish scientific publications on tobacco use during the period 1970–1996. European Journal of Epidemiology15: 23–28.
13.
GuDLiJLiX. (2017) Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics98: 22–32.
14.
Haines-SaahRJBellKDennisS (2015) A qualitative content analysis of cigarette health warning labels in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Public Health105: 61–69.
15.
HalasGSchultzASHRothneyJ. (2015) A scoping review protocol to map the research foci trends in tobacco control over the last decade. BMJ Open2015(5): 006643.
16.
HewJ-J (2017) Hall of fame for mobile commerce and its applications: A bibliometric evaluation of a decade and a half (2000–2015). Telematics and Informatics34: 43–66.
17.
KiraAGloverMBullenC. (2011) Publications as an indicator of increased tobacco control research productivity (quantity and quality) in New Zealand. Nicotine & Tobacco Research13: 474–478.
18.
KusmaBScutaruCQuarcooD. (2009) Tobacco control: Visualization of research activity using density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking procedures. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health6: 1856.
19.
LeeHPaekH-J (2012) Impact of norm perceptions and guilt on audience response to anti-smoking norm PSAs: The case of Korean male smokers. Health Education Journal72(5): 503–511.
20.
LienGDeLandK (2011) Translating the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC): Can we use tobacco control as a model for other non-communicable disease control?Public Health125: 847–853.
21.
McGeeRBangSMarshL (2014) Newspaper coverage of tobacco control in New Zealand. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health38: 265–269.
22.
MamuduHMGonzalezMGlantzS (2011) The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community. American Journal of Public Health101: 2044–2054.
23.
MaoGLiuXDuH. (2015) Way forward for alternative energy research: A bibliometric analysis during 1994–2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews48: 276–286.
24.
MendezDAlshanqeetyOWarnerKE (2013) The potential impact of smoking control policies on future global smoking trends. Tobacco Control22: 46–51.
25.
MerigoJMMas-TurARoig-TiernoN. (2015) A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research68: 2645–2653.
26.
NicolaisenJ (2010) Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61: 205–207.
27.
NierkensVStronksKvan OelCJ. (2005) Beliefs of Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in the Netherlands about smoking cessation: Implications for prevention. Health Education Research20: 622–634.
28.
NykiforukCIJOslerGEViehbeckS (2010) The evolution of smoke-free spaces policy literature: A bibliometric analysis. Health Policy97: 1–7.
29.
OrmeMEHogueSLKennedyLM. (2001) Development of the health and economic consequences of smoking interactive model. Tobacco Control10: 55–61.
30.
PawarPSNaglerEMGuptaPC. (2015) Tracking intervention delivery in the ‘Tobacco-Free Teachers/Tobacco-Free Society’ program, Bihar, India. Health Education Research30: 731–741.
31.
PustSMohnenSMSchneiderS (2008) Individual and social environment influences on smoking in children and adolescents. Public Health122: 1324–1330.
32.
QiuHChenY (2009) Bibliometric analysis of nicotine research in China during the period of 1991 to 2007. Inhalation Toxicology21: 965–971.
33.
SahooSSBodenreiderORutterJL. (2008) An ontology-driven semantic mashup of gene and biological pathway information: Application to the domain of nicotine dependence. Journal of Biomedical Informatics41: 752–765.
34.
SanchezADRamaMCDRGarciaJA (2017) Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics23: 8–15.
35.
SmithDR (2009) Workplace tobacco control: The nexus of public and occupational health. Public Health123: 817–819.
36.
StylesMWilliamsBHumphrisG (2012) Is the effectiveness of tobacco image-based warning labels likely to vary by socio-demographic variable? Findings from an online survey of 19,000 members of the UK Public. Health Education Journal72(3): 351–362.
37.
TahaNATeeOG (2015) Tobacco cessation through community pharmacies: Knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived barriers among pharmacists in Penang. Health Education Journal74(6): 681–690.
38.
TwymanLBonevskiBPaulC. (2016) The association between cannabis use and motivation and intentions to quit tobacco within a sample of Australian socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers. Health Education Research31(6): 771–781.
WarnerKETamJKoltunSM (2014) Growth in Tobacco Control publications by authors from low- and middle-income countries. Tobacco Control23(3): 231–237.
41.
WhiteSBairdW (2013) Disadvantaged former miners’ perspective on smoking cessation: A qualitative study. Health Education Journal72(6): 755–760. Available at: https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/381674
42.
WillemsenMCNagelhoutGE (2016) Country differences and changes in focus of scientific tobacco control publications between 2000 and 2012 in Europe. European Addiction Research22: 52–58.
43.
WipfliHLFujimotoKValenteTW (2010) Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health100: 1260–1266.
World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) (2003) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Available at: http://www.who.int/fctc/text_download/en/ (accessed 10 February 2017).
47.
WuDYangTCottrellRR. (2014) The effects of tobacco-related health-warning images on intention to quit smoking among urban Chinese smokers. Health Education Journal74(3): 287–298.
48.
ZyoudSHAl-JabiSWSweilehWM (2014a) Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on waterpipe (narghile, shisha, hookah) tobacco smoking during the period 2003–2012. Tobacco Induced Diseases12: 7.
49.
ZyoudSHAl-JabiSWSweilehWM (2014b) Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: A bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health14: 667.
50.
ZyoudSHAl-JabiSWSweilehWM. (2014c) A Scopus-based examination of tobacco use publications in Middle Eastern Arab countries during the period 2003–2012. Harm Reduction Journal11: 14.
