Educational video is a productive means to advocate lifestyle modifications such as changes in the dietary routine. This study assesses the understandability, actionability and suitability of newly developed educational videos aimed at encouraging dietary adjustments among hypertension patients.
Method:
In all, 183 participants were recruited via convenience sampling and rated the understandability, actionability and suitability of the videos using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio-Visual material (PEMAT-A/V) and the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) scale.
Results:
Eleven videos were developed from five main topics related to the dietary management of hypertension. Participants agreed that all videos were highly understandable, actionable and suitable for use as educational tools, with scores of more than 85%, 89% and 80%, respectively.
Conclusion/Implications:
Overall, the newly developed videos gained high scores for understandability, actionability and suitability. This finding reflects positive acceptance of the videos among various healthcare professionals and patients with hypertension.
Ab HamidMRMohd IsamudinMBuhariSS, et al. (2020) Quality, understandability and actionability of online patient education material about hypertension. Nutrition & Food Science51(4): 621–632.
2.
Ab HamidMRMohd YusofNDBBuhariSS, et al. (2021) Development and validation of educational video content, endorsing dietary adjustments among patients diagnosed with hypertension. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. Epub ahead of print 26 July. DOI: 10.1080/14635240.2021.1958695.
3.
AdamsNE (2015) Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association103(3): 152–153.
4.
AhmadMHManCSOthmanF, et al. (2021) High sodium food consumption pattern among Malaysian population. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition40(Suppl. 1): 4.
5.
Al OwaifeerAMAlrefaieSMAlsawahZM, et al. (2018) The effect of a short animated educational video on knowledge among glaucoma patients. Clinical Ophthalmology12: 805–810.
6.
BeseraGTCoxSMalotteCK, et al. (2016) Assessing patient exposure to a video-based intervention in STD clinic waiting rooms: Findings from the safe in the city trial. Health Promotion Practice17(5): 731–738.
7.
BrameCJ (2016) Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE – Life Sciences Education15(4): es6.
8.
BrevikTBLaakePBjorklyS (2020) Effect of culturally tailored education on attendance at mammography and the Papanicolaou test. Health Services Research55(3): 457–468.
9.
CahapayMB (2021) How to plan lessons in the new normal education: A reintroduction to selected instructional design processes. Aquademia5(1): ep21006.
CrawfordASerhalE (2020) Digital health equity and COVID-19: The innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(6): e19361.
12.
DashSDelibasicVAlsaeedS, et al. (2020) Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to physician-delivered dietary advice for patients with hypertension. Journal of Community Health45(5): 1067–1072.
13.
DiepNACocquytCZhuC, et al. (2016) Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education101: 84–101.
14.
DiwanjiPSimonBPMärkiM, et al. (2014) Success factors of online learning videos. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on interactive mobile communication technologies and learning (IMCL 2014), Thessaloniki, Greece, 13–14 November. New York: IEEE.
15.
DoakCCDoakLGRootJH (1996) Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
16.
GibsonJMEEllisRKJonesSP (2019) ‘Dr Google’ will see you now! A review of online consumer information about anticoagulant and antithrombotic medication for prevention of recurrent stroke. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet23(1): 1–12.
17.
GuoPJKimJRubinR (2014) How video production affects student engagement. In: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning @ scale conference, pp. 41–50. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2556325.2566239
KellyJTCampbellKLHoffmannT, et al. (2018) Patient experiences of dietary management in chronic kidney disease: A focus group study. Journal of Renal Nutrition28(6): 393–402.
LeiteSSAfioACECarvalhoLV, et al. (2018) Construction and validation of an educational content validation instrument in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem71(Suppl. 4): 1635–1641.
22.
MaGXBhimlaAZhuL, et al. (2021) Development of an intervention to promote physical activity and reduce dietary sodium intake for preventing hypertension and chronic disease in Filipino Americans. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities8: 283–292.
23.
McCallMSpencerEOwenH, et al. (2018) Characteristics and efficacy of digital health education: An overview of systematic reviews. Health Education Journal77(5): 497–514.
24.
MahmoodSShahKUKhanTM, et al. (2019) Non-pharmacological management of hypertension: In the light of current research. Irish Journal of Medical Science188(2): 437–452.
25.
Non-Communicable Disease Section (2015) Salt Reduction Strategy to Prevent and Control NCD for Malaysia 2015-2020. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Health Malaysia.
26.
NutbeamD (2018) Health education and health promotion revisited. Health Education Journal78(6): 705–709.
27.
ReidKRYReidKEsquivelJH, et al. (2018) Video education improves heart failure knowledge and self-care. Journal of Cardiac Failure24(8): S97–S98.
28.
Samimi KalatMRamezaniMNabaviFH, et al. (2019) Investigation the suitability of patient education pamphlets and patient satisfaction among teaching hospitals in 2015. Evidence Based Care8(4): 45–51.
29.
ShoemakerSJWolfMSBrachC (2014) Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Education and Counseling96(3): 395–403.
SmaldinoSELowtherDLMimsC (2018) Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.
32.
SooMJChowZYChingSM, et al. (2020) Prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension in Malaysia from 1980-2018: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Meta-Analysis8(4): 320–344.
33.
ThapaDKVisentinDCKornhaberR, et al. (2021) The influence of online health information on health decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling104(4): 770–784.
34.
TuongWLarsenERArmstrongAW (2014) Videos to influence: A systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine37(2): 218–233.
35.
UngerTBorghiCCharcharF, et al. (2020) 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension75(6): 1334–1357.
36.
VaitkeviciuteRBallLEHarrisN (2015) The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition18(4): 649–658.
37.
VishnevetskyJWaltersCBTanKS (2018) Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Patient Education and Counseling101(3): 490–496.
38.
WheltonPKCareyRMAronowWS, et al. (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology71(19): e127–e248.
39.
WilliamsBManciaGSpieringW, et al. (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. European Heart Journal39(33): 3021–3104.
