Objective: This study sought to investigate teachers’ perceptions of a physical activity-related professional development intervention.
Design: Interview-based qualitative approach founded on the interpretive paradigm.
Setting: Purposive selection of one high-rated independent, and one low-rated public primary school from Auckland, New Zealand.
Method: A qualitative approach was used, incorporating a questionnaire used for purposive sampling and a total of eighteen semi-structured interviews with six teachers from two primary schools.
Results: Participants highly valued the inclusion of all teachers in onsite professional development and felt supported by a strong, positive organizational culture.
Conclusion: Participant teachers believed physical activity played an important role within the school setting, and recognized their role in the provision of opportunities for their students. However, they did not necessarily feel confident and competent to facilitate opportunities. A specific professional development intervention was introduced as one form of support to address this need. Teachers valued first-hand experience of professional development and reported particular enjoyment if they participated alongside their colleagues.
StewartJDennisonDKohlHDoyleA. Exercise Level and Energy Expenditure in Take 10! In-class Physical Activity Programme. J Sch Health2004: 74: 397–400.
2.
BryanCSolmonM. Relationships Between Children’s Engagement in Physical Activity and Health-related Fitness Indicators: Exploring the link between engagement and health. Res Q Exerc Sport2007: 78: A16.
3.
BaumanAOwenNLeslieE. Physical Activity and Health Outcomes: Epidemiological evidence, national guidelines and public health initiatives. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2000: 57: 229–232.
4.
RidgersNStrattonG. Physical Activity During School Recess: The Liverpool sporting playgrounds project. Pediatr Exerc Sci2005: 17: 281–290.
5.
TelfordASalmonJTimperioACrawfordD. Examining Physical Activity Among 5 to 6 and 10 to 12 year old Children: The children’s leisure activities study. Pediatr Exerc Sci2005: 17: 266–280.
Ministry of Education. Physical Activity for Healthy Confident Kids: Guidelines for sustainable physical activity in school communities. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd, 2007.
10.
FranksAKelderSDinoG. School-based Programs: Lessons learned from CATCH, Planet Health, and Not-on-Tobacco. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy2007: 4: 1–9.
11.
SiedentopD. Introduction to Physical Education, Fitness, and Sport (6th Ed). NY: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
12.
CaleLHarrisJ. School-based Physical Activity Interventions: Effectiveness, trends, issues, implications and recommendations for practice. Journal of Sport, Education and Society2006: 11: 401–420.
13.
FoxKCooperAMcKennaJ. The School and Promotion of Children’s Health-enhancing Physical Activity: Perspectives from the United Kingdom. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education2004: 23: 338–358.
14.
BerkeyCRockettHGillmanMColditzG. One Year Changes in Activity and in Inactivity Among 10- to 15-year-old Boys and Girls: Relationship to change in body mass index. Pediatrics2003: 111: 836–842.
15.
SalmonJBallKCrawfordD. Reducing Sedentary Behaviour and Increasing Physical Activity Among 10-year-old Children: Overview and process evaluation of the ‘Switch-Play’ intervention. Journal of Health Promotion International2005: 20: 7–17.
16.
St LegerL. What’s the Place of Schools Promoting Health? Are we too optimistic?Health Promot Int2004: 19: 405–408.
17.
MorganPHansenV. Physical Education in Primary Schools: Classroom teachers’ perceptions of benefits and outcomes. Health Educ J2008: 67: 196–207.
18.
MuijsDHarrisAChapmanCStollLRussJ. Improving Schools in Socio-economically Disadvantaged Areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement2004: 15: 149–175.
19.
BlandfordS. Managing Professional Development in Schools. London: Routledge, 2000.
20.
ArmourKYellingM. Continuing Professional Development for Experienced Physical Education Teachers: Towards effective provision. Journal of Sport, Education and Society2004: 9: 95–114.
21.
ConwayCHibbardSAlbertDHouriganR. Professional Development for Arts Teachers. Arts Education2005: 107: 3–7.
22.
Day,C. Developing Teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press, 1999.
23.
GuskeyT. Evaluating Professional Development. USA: Corwin Press Inc, 2000.
24.
KnowlesM. The Adult Learner: A neglected species. Housten: Gulf Publishing, 1990.
25.
McKennaJRiddochC. Perspectives on Health and Exercise. Palgrave MacMillan: New York, 2003.
SmithR. Successful School Management. UK: Cassell, 1995 p 227
28.
HoyeRSmithAWesterbeekHStewartBNicholsonM. Sport Management Principles and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 2006.
29.
FoxKHarrisJ. Promoting Physical Activity through Schools. In McKennaJRiddochC. Perspectives on Health and Exercise. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.
30.
DavidsonCTolichM (Eds). Social Science Research in New Zealand (2nd Ed). New Zealand: Pearson Education New Zealand Ltd, 2003.
31.
SparkesA. Research Paradigms in Physical Education: Some brief comments on differences that make a difference. British Journal of Physical Education Research Supplement1994: 14: 11–16.
32.
PattonM. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd Ed). USA: Sage Publications, 1990.
33.
CreswellJ. Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002.
34.
Unitec, New Zealand. Active Tools Programme Resource. Auckland: Unitec, 2005.
35.
Ministry of Education and Sport and Recreation New Zealand. A Summary of the Evaluation of the Physical Activity Pilot Project. Wellington, New Zealand, 2005.
