With the growing interest in the expertise approach to high performance, its application in surgery remains underexplored. This study uses a constructivist grounded theory design and intensive interviews to examine the development of professional excellence and cognitive productivity among six renowned surgeons. It traces their trajectories from early life to global recognition. The analysis generated the “Description of the Dynamics of Professional Excellence Formation in Surgical Medicine,” highlighting the crucial role of personal and physical abilities, psychological adaptability, and resilience in overcoming challenges. These elements, shaped by evolving contexts and complex interactions, foster continuous development, innovation, and leadership. The findings reveal that global innovation represents the peak of cognitive productivity, while exceptional leadership marks the height of professional excellence. Participants engaged in dynamic processes integrating both. The study provides valuable insights into cultivating excellence in surgery, emphasizing sustained growth, ethical commitment, and effective problem-solving to achieve a lasting global impact.
Plain Language Summary
How Great Surgeons Develop Excellence and Make a Global Impact
This study looks at how six internationally recognized surgeons achieved excellence in their careers. Through in-depth interviews, the research explores their journeys from early life to becoming global leaders in surgery. The findings show that outstanding performance is not only about medical skills—it also requires strong personal qualities like adaptability, persistence, and mental strength. These surgeons kept improving themselves by learning from challenges, solving problems, and staying committed to their goals and ethics. Over time, they became innovative thinkers and inspiring leaders. Their stories highlight how continuous growth, creativity, and responsibility can lead to lasting impact in the field of surgery. This study offers useful lessons for anyone interested in how excellence is developed in complex, high-pressure professions like surgical medicine. These insights may be helpful to educators, training programs, and policymakers who wish to better understand and support the development of future surgical professionals, as well as talent development programs that aim to help gifted individuals identify their early career interests and build pathways that align with their strengths.
AljoharR. M.AlarfajA. A. (2024). Stages of talent development in the field of creative writing among writers of stories and novels: The influence of chronological age, internal factors, and environmental factors. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(2), S3. https://esiculture.com/index.php/esiculture
4.
AljuaidA.LiuX. M. (2023). Sociocultural barriers for female participation in STEM: A case of Saudi women in cybersecurity. Journal of Cybersecurity Education, Research and Practice, 2023(1), Article 2. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jcerp/vol2023/iss1/2
5.
BakerS. E.EdwardsR. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? [Discussion paper]. National Centre for Research Methods. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273
6.
BirksM.MillsJ. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
7.
BloomB. S. (1985a). The nature of the study and why it was done. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 3–18). Ballantine Books.
8.
BloomB. S. (1985b). Generalizations about talent development. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507–549). Ballantine Books.
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
10.
BryantA.CharmazK. (2007). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). Sage.
11.
BucknorA. M.KamaliP.PhillipsN.MathijssenI.RakhorstH.LinS. J.FurnasH. (2018). Gender inequality for women in plastic surgery: A systematic scoping review. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 141(6), 1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004375
12.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
13.
CharmazK. (2025). Constructing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
14.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
15.
CreswellJ. W.HansonW. E.Clark PlanoV. L.MoralesA. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.
16.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
17.
DaiD. (2021). Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development: A new vision for gifted and talented education. In SternbergR.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 99–122). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_7
DaiD. Y. (2024). The nature and nurture of talent: A new foundation for human excellence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009370622
20.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
21.
EricssonK. A. (2003). The acquisition of expert performance as problem solving: Construction and modification of mediating mechanisms through deliberate practice. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 31–83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615771.003
22.
EricssonK. A. (2011). The surgeon’s expertise. In FryH.KneeboneR. (Eds.), Surgical education (Advances in medical education, Vol. 2., pp. 107–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1682-7_7
23.
EricssonK. A. (2015). Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: A perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(11), 1471–1486. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000939
24.
EricssonK. A. (2018). The differential influence of experience, practice, and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 745–769). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.038
25.
EricssonK. A.PoolR. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
26.
FryH.SevdalisN.KneeboneR. (2011). Researching surgical education. In FryH.KneeboneR. (Eds.), Surgical education: Theorising an emerging domain (pp. 55–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1682-7_4
27.
GagnéF. (2009). The differentiation model of giftedness and talent. In RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillenK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed., pp. 165–192). Creative Learning Press.
28.
GhaderiI.KorovinL.FarrellT. M. (2021). Preparation for challenging cases: What differentiates expert from novice surgeons?Journal of Surgical Education, 78(2), 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.019
29.
GlaserB.StraussA. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
30.
GoertzelT.HansenA. (2004). Cradles of eminence: Childhoods of more than 700 famous men and women (2nd ed.). Great Potential Press.
31.
GuteG.GuteD.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2016). Assessing psychological complexity in highly creative persons: The case of jazz pianist and composer Oscar Peterson. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.18536/jge.2016.01.1.1.03
32.
GuteG.GuteD. S.NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2008). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802391207
33.
HardréP. L.NiihiraM.LeClaireE. L. (2017). Developing expertise in gynecologic surgery: Reflective perspectives of international experts on learning environments and processes. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 10, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S111/488
34.
KanoksinS.SongkhlaB. N.TansawetA.LaepeamthongI.SukhivbulP.TechapongsatornS. (2025). Effectiveness of deliberate practices versus conventional lecture in trauma training for medical students. BMC Medical Education, 25, Article 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06732-8
35.
KarmaliR. J.SiuJ. M.YouD. Z.DossaF.MacRaeH. M.ReznickR. K.SanfilippoA. T.BelliveauP. (2018). The surgical skills and technology elective program (SSTEP): A comprehensive simulation-based surgical skills initiative for preclerkship medical students. The American Journal of Surgery, 216(2), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.012
36.
LeoneS. A.Reiter-PalmonR. (2022). Leading creative teams: A process-perspective with implications for organizational leaders. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 8(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000296
37.
MadaniA.WatanabeY.BilgicE.PucherP. H.VassiliouM. C.AggarwalR.FriedG. M.MitmakerE. J.FeldmanL. S. (2017). Measuring intra-operative decision-making during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Validity evidence for a novel interactive web-based assessment tool. Surg Endoscopy, 31(3), 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5091-7
38.
McDonaldJ. (2025). Operational readiness for high-risk professions [Doctoral dissertation, University of Westminster]. Westminster Research. https://doi.org/10.34737/wyy67
39.
McDonaldJ.OrlickT.LettsM. (1995). Mental readiness in surgeons and its links to performance excellence in surgery. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 15(5), 691–697.
McWilliamsM. A.HoldingE. Z.KnotekS. E. (2019). Talent development in medicine and software engineering. In SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 109–134). American Psychological Association.
42.
MorseJ. M.BarrettM.MayanM.OlsonK.SpiersJ. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
43.
NairD. (2024). Using Bourdieu’s habitus in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae007
44.
NormanG. R.GriersonL. E. M.SherbinoJ.HamstraS. J.SchmidtH. G.MamedeS. (2018). Expertise in medicine and surgery. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 331–355). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.019
45.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.DavisL. C.WorrellF. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318
46.
PaikS. J.GozaliC.Marshall-HarperK. R. (2019). Productive giftedness: A new mastery approach to understanding talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20319
47.
PerssonR. S. (2012). Cultural variation and dominance in a globalised knowledge-economy: Towards a culture-sensitive research paradigm in the science of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27(1), 15–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2012.11673603
48.
PluckerJ. A.McWilliamsJ.GuoJ. (2021). Smart contexts for 21st-century talent development. In SternbergR.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 295–317). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_17
49.
PortengaS. (2018). Performance skills for academic talent development: Integrating sport and performance psychology skills into the classroom. In SubotnikR.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Prufrock Press.
SimontonD. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. Guilford.
52.
SloaneK. D. (1985). Home influences in talent development. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 439–476). Ballantine Books.
53.
SosniakL. A. (1985). A long-term commitment to learning. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 477–507). Ballantine Books.
54.
SternbergR. J.RenzulliJ. S.AmbroseD. (2024). The field of giftedness—Past, present, and prospects: Insights from Joseph S. Renzulli and Robert J. Sternberg. Roeper Review, 46(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2024.2357379
55.
StoegerH. (2009). The history of giftedness research. In ShavininaL. V. (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 17–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_2
56.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
57.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2018). The talent development framework: Overview of components and implications for policy and practice. In SubotnikR.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education. Prufrock Press.
58.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2021). Talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 499–521). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_24
59.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.) (2019). The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 3–5). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-000
60.
TannenbaumA. J. (2009). Defining, determining, discovering, & developing excellence. In RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillenK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed., pp. 502–570). Creative Learning Press.
61.
ThornbergR.CharmazK. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 5(2014), 153–169.
62.
TjønnåsM. S.MullerS.VåpenstadC.OseS. O.DasA.SandsundM. (2024). Stress responses in surgical trainees during simulation-based training courses in laparoscopy. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05393-3
63.
UrbinaS. (2011). Tests of intelligence. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanS. B. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 20–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244
64.
ZieglerA.DebatinT.StoegerH. (2019). Learning resources and talent development from a systemic point of view. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1445(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14018
