Abstract
While teacher rating scales are a common method of identification of student abilities, variability in scores can present challenges. In this brief/conceptual replication, we examine the stability of teacher ratings in a rural school setting to investigate (a) if teacher rating scales were the sole component for identification, would the same students be identified for gifted services when comparing top students by grade level versus the top students in each classroom? (b) likewise how many students were identified as the top in their grade and classroom level in both first and second grade? While considerable variability existed in gifted identification based on whether differences in teachers’ rating scale use were considered, discrepancies between approaches were less pronounced than in our previous study. Despite the variability in scores, including teacher ratings in gifted identification may still offer unique insights. However, we argue that the substantial time required of teachers may not justify their use, but, if used, they should only be used to expand access to gifted services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
