Exceptionally talented refugee students are often underrepresented in allocating to gifted programs because of inadequate identification methods in Arab countries. This study investigates the Arabic version of the Having Opportunities Promotes Excellence (HOPE) Scale for identifying gifted refugee students. Students (n = 13,598) from refugee camp schools in Jordan were surveyed in the 2020/2021 academic year. Elementary, middle, and high school teachers (n = 423) completed the translated Arabic version of the HOPE Scale, measuring 11 items on the academic and social construct of giftedness. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an excellent fit; however, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis results revealed that the scale needed more invariance across groups. The results suggest that although the HOPE Scale-Arabic version has sufficient validation evidence, careful consideration is required when applying it to different subgroups of refugee students. Constructs of cultural relevance may need to be added to better assess the item’s validity.
AcarS.SenS.CayirdagN. (2016). Consistency of the performance and nonperformance methods in gifted identification: A multilevel meta-analytic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216634438
2.
Al-HroubA. (2021). Utility of psychometric and dynamic assessments for identifying cognitive characteristics of twice-exceptional students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 747872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747872
3.
Al-HroubA. (2022). Gifted education in Lebanon: Re-examining the role of educational and learning capitals. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2073644
4.
Al-HroubA. (2023). Rethinking gifted education in Jordan: An analysis of the role of educational and learning capitals. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2203591. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2203591
5.
AllenJ. K. (2017). Exploring the role teacher perceptions play in the underrepresentation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted programming. Gifted Child Today, 40(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517690188
6.
Almomani̇H.Alowei̇diA. (2020) The psychometric characteristics of the Renzulli scale of behavioral characteristics (3rd Edition) in the detection of gifted students in the age group (12–18) in Jordan. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.656673
7.
AlodatA. M.AlmomaniF. A. (2019). Evaluating educational services offered for Syrian gifted refugee students in Jordanian schools. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.552789
8.
AlodatA. M.AlshagranH. I.Al-BakkarA. M. (2021). Psychosocial support services provided for Syrian refugees with disabilities: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-021-00144-2
9.
AlodatA. M.MomaniF. A. (2018). Gifted Syrian refugee students in Jordanian schools: Have we identified them?Gifted and Talented International, 33(1–2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1665484
10.
AmbroseD. (2013). Socioeconomic inequality and giftedness: Suppression and distortion of high ability. Roeper Review, 35(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.766960
11.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2014). Amos (version 23.0). IBM SPSS.
12.
BaconD. R.BeanB. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305284638
13.
BehrD. (2017). Assessing the use of back translation: The shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252188
14.
BorlandJ. H. (2021). The trouble with conceptions of giftedness. In SternbergR. J.AmbroseD. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 37–49). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_3
15.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
16.
ChemaliZ.BorbaC. P. C.JohnsonK.KhairS.FricchioneG. L. (2018). Needs assessment with elder Syrian refugees in Lebanon: Implications for services and interventions. Global Public Health, 13(9), 1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1373838
17.
CulbertsonS.LingT.HenhamM. L.CorbettJ.KaramR. T.PankowskaP.SaundersC. L.BellasioJ.BaruchB. (2016). Evaluation of the emergency education response for Syrian refugee children and host communities in Jordan. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1203
18.
Díaz CárdenasG. A. (2020). The underrepresentation of Latin students in gifted programs: Teachers’ perceptions of giftedness and its effects in the nomination of potentially gifted Latin students [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
19.
Ecker-LysterM.NiilekselaC. (2017). Enhancing gifted education for underrepresented students: Promising recruitment and programming strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686216
20.
EveredL. J.JarwanF. A.AlabedR. T. (1997). Jordan’s Jubilee School: Educating the Arab world’s gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 20(3), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621759702000315
21.
FegertJ. M.DiehlC.LeyendeckerB.HahlwegK.Prayon-BlumV. (2018). Psychosocial problems in traumatized refugee families: Overview of risks and some recommendations for support services. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0210-3
22.
FischerR.KarlJ. A. (2019). A primer to (cross-cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
23.
FrenchB. F.FinchW. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 378–402. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_3
24.
GarverM. S.MentzerJ. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.
GentryM.PereiraN.PetersS. J.McIntoshJ. S.FugateC. M.ComptonL. (2015). HOPE teacher rating scale: Involving teachers in equitable identification of gifted and talented students for grades K-12: Administration manual. Prufrock Press.
27.
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC.BleibergJ. F. (2019). Money over merit? Socioeconomic gaps in receipt of gifted services. Harvard Educational Review, 89(3), 337–369. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-89.3.337
28.
HandsL. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives on the identification of, and provisions for, gifted and talented English as an additional language students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Edith Cowan University.
29.
Hassan Hemdan MohamedA.Mahdi KazemA.PfeifferS.AlzubaidiA.-Q.Abu ElwanR.AmbosaidiA.Al-WashahiM.Al-KharosiT. (2017). Identification of gifted students in Oman: Gender and grade differences on the Gifted Rating Scales–School Form. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217718277
30.
Hattar-PollaraM. (2019). Barriers to education of Syrian refugee girls in Jordan: Gender-based threats and challenges. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12480
31.
HodgesJ.TayJ.MaedaY.GentryM. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
32.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
KrafftC.SieverdingM.SalemiC.KeoC. (2018). Syrian refugees in Jordan: Demographics, livelihoods, education, and health (Working paper no. 1184). The Economic Research Forum.
35.
LakinJ. M. (2016). Universal screening and the representation of historically underrepresented minority students in gifted education. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16630348
36.
LeeH.GentryM. (2023). The major characteristics and trends of gifted education doctoral dissertation research from 2006 through 2016. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 46(4), 340–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532231199267
37.
LeeH.GentryM.MaedaY. (2022). Validity evidence of the HOPE Scale in Korea: Identifying gifted students from low-income and multicultural families. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211024590
38.
LeeH.SewardK.GentryM. (2022). Equitable identification of underrepresented gifted students: The relationship between students’ academic achievement and a teacher-rating scale. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(3), 400–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221088816
39.
LiH.PfeifferS. I.PetscherY.KumtepeA. T.MoG. (2008). Validation of the gifted rating scales–school form in China. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208315802
40.
LiuW. M.WallerL. (2018). Identifying and educating underrepresented gifted students. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 417–431). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-027
41.
LoC. O.PorathM. (2017). Paradigm shifts in gifted education: An examination vis-à-vis its historical situatedness and pedagogical sensibilities. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217722840
42.
McNeishD.AnJ.HancockG. R. (2018). The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cut-offs in latent variable models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286
43.
McNeishD.WolfM. G. (2023). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425
44.
MerrotsyP. (2013). Invisible gifted students. Talent Development and Excellence, 5(2), 31–42.
45.
PereiraN. (2021). Finding talent among elementary English learners: A validity study of the HOPE Teacher Rating Scale. Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220985942
46.
PetersS. J.EngerrandK. G. (2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165
47.
PetersS. J.GentryM. (2010). Multigroup construct validity evidence of the HOPE scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210378332
48.
PetersS. J.GentryM. (2012). Group-specific norms and teacher-rating scales: Implications for underrepresentation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12438717
49.
PetersS. J.GentryM. (2013). Additional validity evidence and across-group equivalency of the HOPE Teacher rating scale. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469253
50.
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
51.
PfeifferS. I.BleiS. (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 177–198). Springer.
52.
PfeifferS. I.PetscherY. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the Gifted Rating Scales—Preschool/Kindergarten form. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311055
53.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
54.
ReavellJ.FazilQ. (2017). The epidemiology of PTSD and depression in refugee minors who have resettled in developed countries. Journal of Mental Health, 26(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1222065
55.
RicciardiC.Haag-WolfA.WinslerA. (2020). Factors associated with gifted identification for ethnically diverse children in poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220937685
56.
RidgleyL. M.DaVia RubensteinL.FinchW. H. (2019). Issues and opportunities when using rating scales to identify creatively gifted students: Applying an IRT approach. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1–2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2020.1722041
57.
SchrothS. T.HelferJ. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-850
58.
ShaughnessyM. (2020). An interview with Steven Pfeiffer: Thinking about giftedness and talent development- What are the issues?North American Journal of Psychology, 22(3), 373–382.
59.
SilvermanL. K.GilmanB. J. (2020). Best practices in gifted identification and assessment: Lessons from the WISC-V. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1569–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22361
ThoresenP.FieldingA.GillieattS.ThoresenS. H. (2016). Identifying the needs of refugee and asylum-seeking children in Thailand: A focus on the perspectives of children. Journal of Refugee Studies, 30(3), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few028
YoonS. Y.GentryM. (2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330564
64.
YuanK. H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30(1), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00078
65.
ZieglerA.StoegerH.VialleW. (2012). Giftedness and gifted education: The need for a paradigm change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456070
