This study explores talent-development trajectories of early-career chemical engineers to identify key components for success in the field using the talent development megamodel as a theoretical framework. Interviews with 12 recent PhD graduates reveal a trajectory across four developmental stages: (a) math ability and science ability, (b) chemical engineering competence and specialization competence, and (c) expertise/creative productivity. Teachable components include cognitive skills (e.g., strong math/science foundation, problem-solving), metacognitive skills (e.g., experimental design, project management), motivational skills (e.g., perseverance, learning from failures), and psychosocial skills (e.g., communication, collaboration) at different stages. The study highlights the importance of early experiences, mentorship, and continuous learning in fostering success in chemical engineering. Understanding field-specific talent development can inform targeted initiatives to address workforce gaps and promote STEM talent.
AdamsC.ChamberlinS.GavinM. K.SchultzC.SheffieldL. J.SubotnikR. (2008). The STEM promise: Recognizing and developing talent and expanding opportunities for promising students of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. National Association for Gifted Children.
2.
BerkowitzM.SternE. (2018). Which cognitive abilities make the difference? Predicting academic achievements in advanced STEM studies. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040048
3.
de ReviereA.JacobsB.StalsI.De ClercqJ. (2024). Cross-curricular project-based laboratory learning enables hands-on interdisciplinary education for chemical engineering students. Education for Chemical Engineers, 47, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2024.01.001
KornbluhM. (2015). Combatting challenges to establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1021941
6.
Lavado-AngueraS.Velasco-QuintanaP. J.Terrón-LópezM. J. (2024). Project-based learning (PBL) as an experiential pedagogical methodology in engineering education: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 14(6), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060617
7.
LuoL.StoegerH. (2023). Developing eminence in STEMM: An interview study with talent development and STEMM experts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1521(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14968
8.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley.
9.
MeyersK. L.OhlandM. W.PawleyA. L.SillimanS. E.SmithK. A. (2012). Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1), 119–131.
10.
MulletD. R.RinnA. N.KettlerT. (2017). Catalysts of women’s talent development in STEM: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(4), 253–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17735305
11.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS.CalvertE. (2015). Serving rural gifted students through supplemental and out-of-school programming. In StambaughT.WoodsS. (Eds.), Best practices for serving gifted students in rural settings (pp. 239–256). Prufrock Press.
12.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.DavisL. C.WorrellF. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318
13.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2015). Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077
14.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2017). The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. Roeper Review, 39(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1247310
15.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2019). Reflections on talent development in academics. In SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 225–236). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-011
16.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
17.
PrabhuR.MendoncaS.BellairuP. K.ShiriN. D. (2024). Enhancing engineering education through mini project-based learning in computer integrated manufacturing laboratory: A student-centric approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2362260
18.
RamkrishnaD.AmundsonN. R. (2004). Mathematics in chemical engineering: A 50 year introspection. AIChE Journal, 50(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10002
19.
RodriguezS. L.LuC.BartlettM. (2018). Engineering identity development: A review of the higher education literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(3), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.428182
20.
SikoraJ.PokropekA. (2012). Intergenerational transfers of preferences for science careers in comparative perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 34(16), 2501–2527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.698028
21.
SubotnikR. F.AlmarodeJ.LeeG. M. (2016). STEM schools as incubators of talent development. Gifted Child Today, 39(4), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516661592
22.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
23.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2023). The role of insider knowledge in the trajectories of highly accomplished scientists. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1527(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15034
24.
Vaez GhaemiR.PotvinG. (2021). Experimenting with labs: Practical and pedagogical considerations for the integration of problem-based lab instruction in chemical engineering. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 99(10), 2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24136
25.
VanMeter-AdamsA.FrankenfeldC. L.BasesJ.EspinaV.LiottaL. A. (2014). Students who demonstrate strong talent and interest in STEM are initially attracted to STEM through extracurricular experiences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-11-0213
26.
WinkensA. K.Leicht-ScholtenC. (2023). Does engineering education research address resilience and if so, how? A systematic literature review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2171852
