DixsonD. D.WorrellF. C.Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F. (2016). Beyond perceived ability: The contribution of psychosocial factors to academic performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13210
2.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.DavisL. C.WorrellF. C. (2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318
3.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.SubotnikR. F.WorrellF. C. (2015). Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077
4.
PetersS. J.Rambo-HernandezK.MakelM. C.MatthewsM. S.PluckerJ. A. (2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701834
5.
PreckelF.GolleJ.GrabnerR.JarvinL.KozbeltA.MüllensiefenD.Olszewski-KubiliusP.SchneiderW.SubotnikR.VockM.WorrellF. C. (2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030
6.
Rambo-HernandezK. E.MakelM.KoehlerN. (2024). Millions of students are (still) above grade level: Achievement and achievement variability in mathematics and reading before and during COVID-19 in the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 385–409.
7.
RinnA. N. (2024). Conducting research on psychosocial skills associated with academic talent development. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 340–354.
8.
SosniakL. A.GabelkoN. H. (2008). Every child’s right: Academic talent development by choice, not chance. Teachers College Press.
9.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest12(1) 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
10.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2018). Talent development as the most promising focus of giftedness and gifted education. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 231–245). American Psychological Association.
11.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2019). Environmental factors and personal characteristics interact to yield high performance in domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804
12.
VerschuerenK.RinnA. N. (2024). The role of psychosocial and contextual factors in academic talent development: In search of general and specific developmental processes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 357–384.
13.
YangJ.ChoS. (2024). Developing hidden talent: An exploratory study of math advanced curriculum implementation and its effects on young mathematically promising English learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 47(4), 410–434.
ZieglerA.VialleW. (in press). The systemic perspective on giftedness. In HoogeveenL.KroesbergenE.O’ReillyC.VerschuerenK. (Eds.), European handbook on gifted education and talent development. Routledge.