The Talent Development Trajectory of a Persuasive Communicator: A Biological Anthropologist Becomes a Voice for Animal Justice

Abstract

Through the lens of the talent development megamodel and the higher mastery framework, this instrumental case study examines the career trajectory of a biological anthropologist, Barbara J. King, who became a persuasive science communicator in the struggle for animal justice. Much of her impact stems from her development in two career paths, one formal and one informal, in biological anthropology and science communication. She developed credibility as a primatologist and academic and was able to apply her experience in the biological anthropology domain to public communication channels to share information about animal cognition and behavior. Through cumulative epiphanies, she came to recognize the value of understanding animals’ lived experience and the need to seek justice for animals. She became confident in her advocacy because of her extensive knowledge base and her teaching and writing skills, which developed through the many opportunities she eagerly pursued. King’s resilience, optimism, patience, curiosity, and motivation combined with confidence in her knowledge base and communication skills to create persuasive communications that challenge the ubiquitous view that animals’ lives are of lesser value than humans’ and they may be used for human purposes. In her dual careers of biological anthropology and science communication, she learned how to share strong evidence from animal research while respecting the individuals receiving her messages. Educators can support development of students’ transformational giftedness by encouraging identity exploration, fostering openness to new ideas, and not limiting their education to the narrow requirements of success within a single domain.

Keywords

animal justice talent development career trajectory transformational giftedness instrumental case study interviews epiphany

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2024). Qualitative methods in psychology after the animal turn: Human-animal and multi-species relations. Qualitative Research in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2380878

Ambrose

(2021). Interdisciplinary exploration guiding conceptions of giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Ambrose

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 1–20). Palgrave MacMillan.

Balzani

Hanlon

(2020). Factors that influence farmers’ views on farm animal welfare: A semi-systematic review and thematic analysis. Animals (2076-2615), 10(9), 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091524

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Beck

B. B.

(1982). Chimpocentrism: Bias in cognitive ethology. Journal of Human Evolution, 11(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(82)80027-4

Berkowitz

M. W.

Bier

M. C.

(2007). What works in character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29–48.

Blattner

Coulter

Kymlicka

(2020). Introduction: Animal labour and the quest for interspecies justice. In Blattner

C. E.

Coulter

Kymlicka

(Eds.), Animal labour: A new frontier of interspecies justice? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846192.003.0001

Bloom

B. J.

(Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine Books.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

Kao

C. F.

Rodriguez

(1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032

10.

Calhoon-Dillahunt

Coppola

Warrington

Yagelski

R. P.

(2022, August 29). Position statement on writing instruction in school. National Council of Teachers of English. https://ncte.org/statement/statement-on-writing-instruction-in-school/

11.

Cialdini

R. B.

Braver

S. L.

Lewis

S. K.

(1974). Attributional bias and the easily persuaded other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(5), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037448

12.

Cohen

G. L.

Sherman

D. K.

(2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137

13.

Cross

J. R.

Cross

T. L.

(2016). The macroproblem of conflicting values in 21st century education. In Ambrose

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization (pp. 111–136). Sense.

14.

Cross

J. R.

Vaughn

C. T.

Mammadov

Cross

T. L.

Kim

O’Reilly

Spielhagen

Pereira

Costa

Hymer

(2019). A cross-cultural study of the social experience of giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1661052

15.

Cross

T. L.

Coleman

L. J.

Terhaar-Yonkers

(1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329101500106

16.

Damon

Menon

Bronk

K. C.

(2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_2

17.

Davis

(2003). What’s wrong with character education? American Journal of Education, 110(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/377672

18.

Denzin

N. K.

(1989). Interpretive interactionism. Sage.

19.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.

20.

Feldman

D. H.

(2000). Developmental theory and the expression of gifts and talents. In Heymans

P. G.

van Lieshout

C. F. M.

(Eds.), Developing talent across the lifespan (pp. 3–16). Psychology Press.

21.

Ferdowsian

Fuentes

A. L.

Johnson

S. M.

King

B. J.

Pierce

(2022). Toward an anti-maleficent research agenda. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 31(1), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180121000487

22.

Feuerstein

Klein

P. S.

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(Eds.). (1991). Mediated learning experience (MLE): Theoretical, psychosocial and learning implications. Freund Publishing House.

23.

Fiala

(2024). Critical character education: Whose character? Which virtues? Interchange, 55, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09510-5

24.

Fletcher

K. L.

Spiers Neumeister

K. L.

(2017). Perfectionism in school: When achievement is not so perfect. Momentum Press.

25.

Fogel

King

B. J.

Shanker

S. J.

(Eds.). (2008). Human development in the 21st century: Visionary policy ideas from systems scientists. Cambridge University Press.

26.

Fox

R. G.

King

B. J.

(Eds.). (2002). Anthropology beyond culture. Berg Publishing.

27.

Grobman

(2009). A psychodynamic psychotherapy approach to the emotional problems of exceptionality and profoundly gifted adolescents and adults: A psychiatrist’s experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903300105

28.

Haugtvedt

C. P.

Petty

R. E.

(1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.308

29.

Heng

M. A.

(2024). Inspiring purpose in high-performance schooling. Routledge.

30.

Horcajo

de la Vega

(2014). Changing doping-related attitudes in soccer players: How can we get stable and persistent changes? European Journal of Sport Science, 14(8), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.905988

31.

John

L. K.

Jeong

Gino

Huang

(2019). The self-presentational consequences of upholding one’s stance in spite of the evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 154, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.07.001

32.

King

B. J.

(1986a). Extractive foraging and the evolution of primate intelligence. Human Evolution, 1(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02436709

33.

King

B. J.

(1986b). Individual differences in tool-using by two captive orangutans. In Taub

D. M.

King

F. A.

(Eds.), Current perspectives in primate dynamics (pp. 469–475). Van Nostrand Reinhold.

34.

King

B. J.

(1994). The information continuum: Social information transfer in monkeys, apes, and hominids. School of American Research Press.

35.

King

B. J.

(1996). Syntax and language origins. Language & Communication, 16(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(96)00007-9

36.

King

B. J.

(2003, August 17). “The DaVinci code”; erudite fiction. New York Times, p. 2002. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/17/arts/l-the-da-vinci-code-erudite-fiction-905542.html

37.

King

B. J.

(2004). The dynamic dance: Nonvocal communication in African apes. Harvard University Press.

38.

King

B. J.

(2007a, March 28). Do student beliefs have a place in the classroom? New York Times, p. A18. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/opinion/l28fish.html

39.

King

B. J.

(2007b). Evolving God: A provocative view on the origins of religion. Doubleday; Random House.

40.

King

B. J.

(2010). Being with animals. Doubleday.

41.

King

B. J.

(2011, May). Thirteen hearts and souls: The chimps of Fauna Sanctuary [Book review]. Book Slut.

42.

King

B. J.

(2013a). How animals grieve. University of Chicago Press.

43.

King

B. J.

(2013b). When animals mourn. Scientific American, 309(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0713-62

44.

King

B. J.

(2015, January 29). Plight of baby lab monkeys reaches Congress. NPR 13.7 Cosmos and Culture. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/01/29/382326538/plight-of-baby-lab-monkeys-reaches-congress

45.

King

B. J.

(2016a, February 6). Sadism, not sport, in stabbing of bulls. New York Times, p. SP11. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/07/sports/letters-to-the-editor.html

46.

King

B. J.

(2016b, November 17). Octopuses are marvels to watch and, for some, to eat alive. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/11/17/502274959/octopuses-are-marvels-to-watch-and-for-some-to-eat-alive

47.

King

B. J.

(2017). Personalities on the plate: The lives and minds of animals we eat. University of Chicago Press.

48.

King

B. J.

(2019a). Deception in the wild. Scientific American, 321(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0919-50

49.

King

B. J.

(2019b, May 31). For the human race, geology is destiny [Book review]. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/for-the-human-race-geology-is-destiny/2019/05/31/80fff8bc-5b06-11e9-9625-01d48d50ef75_story.html

50.

King

B. J.

(2019c, April). Grief and love in the animal kingdom. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/barbara_j_king_grief_and_love_in_the_animal_kingdom

51.

King

B. J.

(2021a). Animals’ best friends: Putting compassion to work for animals in captivity and in the wild. University of Chicago Press.

52.

King

B. J.

(2021b, May 5). My cancer scars map the pain of animals held in research labs. Psyche. https://psyche.co/ideas/my-cancer-scars-map-the-pain-of-animals-held-in-research-labs

53.

King

B. J.

(2022, November 1). Human exceptionalism imposes horrible costs on other animals. Psyche. https://psyche.co/ideas/human-exceptionalism-imposes-horrible-costs-on-other-animals

54.

King

B. J.

Shanker

S. G.

(1997). The expulsion of primates from the garden of language. Evolution of Communication, 1(1), 59–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/eoc.1.1.05kin

55.

King

B. J.

Shanker

S. G.

(2003). How can we know the dancer from the dance? The dynamic nature of African great ape social communication. Anthropological Theory, 3(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499603003001749

56.

King

B. J.

(Ed.). (1999). The origins of language: What nonhuman primates can tell us. School of American Research Press.

57.

Kroger

Martinussen

Marcia

J. E.

(2010). Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.11.002

58.

Kuhn

(1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.

59.

Kuhn

(2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press.

60.

Marcia

J. E.

(1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281

61.

Mathur

M. B.

Peacock

Reichling

D. B.

Nadler

Bain

P. A.

Gardner

C. D.

Robinson

T. N.

(2021). Interventions to reduce meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: Meta-analysis and evidence-based recommendations. Appetite, 164, 105277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105277

62.

McWilliams

M. A.

Holding

E. Z.

Knotek

S. E.

(2019). Talent development in medicine and software engineering. In Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 109–134). American Psychological Association.

63.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). 2017 writing. U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/2017writing.aspx

64.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Long-term trend assessment (1970-2023 trends). U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/ltt/

65.

National Public Radio. (2017, October 25). NPR reaches 99 million people monthly, Genxers and Millennials drive growth. https://www.npr.org/about-npr/559791315/npr-stations-audience-grows-for-fifth-consecutive-national-ratings-period

66.

Nussbaum

M. C.

(2023). Justice for animals: Our collective responsibility. Simon & Schuster.

67.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Davis

L. C.

Worrell

F. C.

(2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 168, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318

68.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Worrell

F. C.

(2016). The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. Roeper Review, 39(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1247310

69.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

Subotnik

R. F.

(2020). Identifying and serving gifted and talented students. In Worrell

F. C.

Hughes

T. L.

Dixson

D. D.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of applied school psychology (pp. 598–612). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235532.034

70.

Oyserman

Lewis

N. A.

Jr. Yan

V. X.

Fisher

O’Donnell

S. C.

Horowitz

(2017). An identity-based motivation framework for self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 28(2–3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1337406

71.

PAN Works. (2024). Bringing ethics to life. https://panworks.io/

72.

Paul

R. W.

(1984). Critical thinking: Fundamental to education for a free society. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 4–14.

73.

PETA Staff. (2015, December 11). NIH ending baby monkey experiments. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. https://www.peta.org/blog/nih-ends-baby-monkey-experiments/

74.

Pollard-Post

(2015, February 23). Experts: Tormenting baby monkeys is bad science. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. https://www.peta.org/blog/experts-scientists-letter-nih-maternal-deprivation-experiments-tormenting-baby-monkeys-is-bad-science/

75.

Pound

Bracken

M. B.

(2014). Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? British Medical Journal, 348, Article 3387. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3387

76.

Preckel

Golle

Grabner

Jarvin

Kozbelt

Müllensiefen

Olszewski-Kubilius

Schneider

Subotnik

Vock

Worrell

F. C.

(2020). Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030

77.

Rao

K. R.

Paranjpe

A. C.

(2016). Psychology in the Indian tradition (1st ed.). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2440-2

78.

Ristau

(2016). Evidence for animal grief? Animal Sentience, 4(8), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1014

79.

Scientific American. (2024). 2025 media kit. https://www.scientificamerican.com/mediakit/

80.

Sleboda

Lagerkvist

C.-J.

(2022). Tailored communication changes consumers’ attitudes and product preferences for genetically modified food. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 104419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104419

81.

Smillie

L. D.

Ruby

M. B.

Tan

N. P.

Stollard

Bastian

(2024). Differential responses to ethical vegetarian appeals: Exploring the role of traits, beliefs, and motives. Journal of Personality, 92(3), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12866

82.

Stake

R. E.

(2000). Case studies. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Sage.

83.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807

84.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658

85.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & the Arts, 12(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000095

86.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266

87.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2022). The most important gift of all? The gift of courage. Roeper Review, 44(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2043501

88.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2023). Transformational giftedness. In Cross

T. L.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development (pp. 203–233). Prufrock Academic Press.

89.

Sternberg

R. J.

Chowkase

Desmet

Karami

Landy

(2021). Beyond transformational giftedness. Education Sciences, 11(192), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050192

90.

Subotnik

R. F.

Jarvin

(2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). Cambridge University Press.

91.

Subotnik

R. F.

Jarvin

Thomas

Lee

G. S. M.

(2016). Transitioning musical abilities into expertise and beyond: The role of psychosocial skills in developing prodigious talent. In McPherson

G. E.

(Ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, education, musicology, and ethnomusicology (pp. 279–293). Oxford University Press.

92.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

93.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2023). The role of insider knowledge in the trajectories of highly accomplished scientists. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1527, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15034

94.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(in press). Outlier talents: Exploring contributions of expert performance to geographically, culturally unique, and cross-domain realms. In Williams

A. M.

Kozbelt

Preckel

Hoffman

R. R.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

95.

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan.

96.

U.S. Department of Education. (2021). An overview of NAEP. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/about/pdf/naep_overview_brochure_2021.pdf

97.

VanTassel-Baska

Bracken

Feng

Brown

(2009). A longitudinal study of enhancing critical thinking and reading comprehension in title I classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903300102

98.

Wallis

King

B. J.

Roth-Meyer

(1986). The effect of female proximity and social interaction on the menstrual cycle of crab-eating monkeys. Primates, 27(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382524

99.

Weisskircher

(2024). Fifty years after Peter Singer’s animal liberation: What has the animal rights movement achieved so far? Political Quarterly, 95(2), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13404

100.

World Science Festival. (2018). The believing brain: Evolution, neuroscience, and the spiritual instinct. https://www.worldsciencefestival.com/programs/believing-brain-evolution-neuroscience-spiritual-instinct/

101.

Worrell

F. C.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2018). Talent development: A path toward eminence. In Pfeiffer

S. I.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

Foley-Nicpon

(Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 247–258). American Psychological Association.

102.

Wyckoff

(2014). Toward justice for animals. Journal of Social Philosophy, 45(4), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12077

103.

Yuen

Lee

Q. A. Y.

Kam

Lau

P. S. Y.

(2017). Purpose in life: A brief review of the literature and its implications for school guidance programs. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 27(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2015.18

104.

Zell

A. L.

Exline

J. J.

Lobel

(2020). Navigating the perils of outperforming others. In Suls

Collins

R. L.

Wheeler

(Eds.), Social comparison, judgment, and behavior (pp. 280–308). Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.03 MB