This article presents a new, systems theory of creative giftedness. The system has three major parts: the person, the ecological context in which the person operates, and the creative contributions that the person makes. Creative giftedness thus is seen as an interaction between the person, the ecological context, and the tasks that the individual undertakes within that context. Suggestions are given as to how to develop creative giftedness within this theoretical approach.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
2.
BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554310
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth.
4.
BemD. J.AllenA. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81(6), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037130
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (2000). Ecological systems theory. In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (3, pp. 129–133). Oxford University Press.
6.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In SternbergR. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
8.
DweckC. S.MangelsJ. A.GoodC. (2004). Motivational effects on attention, cognition, and performance. In DaiD. Y.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 41–55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
9.
FleesonW.NoftleE. E. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00122.x
FrenschP. A.SternbergR. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (5, pp. 157–188). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
GardnerH. (2022). A synthesizing mind: A memoir from the creator of multiple intelligences theory. MIT Press.
14.
GlaveanuV. P.Hanchett HansonM.BaerJ.BarbotB.ClappE.CorazzaG.HennesseyB.KaufmanJ. C.LebudaI.LubartT.MontuoriA.NessI. J.PluckerJ.Reiter-PalmonR.SierraZ.SimontonD. K.Neves-PereiraM. S.SternbergR. J.SternbergR. J. (2019). Advancing creativity theory and research: A sociocultural manifesto. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
15.
KaufmanJ. C. (2023) The creativity advantage. Cambridge University Press.
16.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
17.
KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), (2019). Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
18.
LubartT. (2018). Creativity across the seven Cs. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 134–146). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108185936.012
19.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Guilford Press.
20.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press.
21.
O’HaraL. A.SternbergR. J. (2000). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay–writing performance and their interaction with students’ thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1302_7
22.
RobinsonK.AronicaL. (2015). The creative school: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Viking.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.
27.
SternbergR. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000095
SternbergR. J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: Intelligence is not a personal trait but rather a person × task × situation interaction. Journal of Intelligence, 9(4), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9040058
30.
SternbergR. J. (2024a). Don’t worry that generative AI may compromise human creativity or intelligence in the future: It already has. Journal of Intelligence, 12(7), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12070069
31.
SternbergR. J. (2024b). A systems theory of creativity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C. (2010). Constraints on creativity: Obvious and not so obvious. In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 467–482). Cambridge University Press.
34.
SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C.PretzJ. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. Psychology Press.
35.
SternbergR. J.TrompC.KaramiS. (2023). Intelligence, creativity, and wisdom are situated in the interaction among person x task x situation. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C.KaramiS. (Eds.), Intelligence, creativity, and wisdom: Exploring their connections and distinctions (pp. 367–386). Palgrave-Macmillan.
36.
SternbergR. J.ZhangL. F. (1995). What do we mean by “giftedness”? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900205
37.
SunsteinC. (2021). Conformity: The power of social influences. NYU Press.
