Teachers’ Views of Academically Gifted Students Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study in Three Countries

Abstract

This cross-country study employed a qualitative design to explore teachers’ views of their gifted students and of these students’ adjustment and education during the Covid-19 pandemic. A total of 52 teachers from Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia were interviewed about gifted students in general and, in continuation, about a particular gifted student who was selected for the purpose of this study. In both instances and across all three countries, the teachers tended to describe gifted students mainly in terms of the “harmony hypothesis.” Teaching these students in pandemic circumstances only added to the harmony view: The gifted were seen as having adapted quickly and without much academic loss to the new (learning) conditions. Nevertheless, the pandemic experience also seems to have allowed teachers to see a systemic neglect of gifted students and clearly notice the need for proper enrichment and social-emotional support if these students are to reach their full potential.

Keywords

academically gifted adjustment beliefs inservice teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulla Alabbasi

A. M. A.

Ayoub

A. E.

Ziegler

. (2021). Are gifted students more emotionally intelligent than their non-gifted peers? A meta-analysis. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1770704

Aboud

. (2021). Challenges to gifted education in the Covid-19 pandemic about online learning in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of gifted students and parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 11–21. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/58718/845995

Adelson

J. L

. (2007). A “perfect” case study: Perfectionism in academically talented fourth graders. Gifted Child Today, 30(4), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2007-490

Altaras Dimitrijević

. (2012). A faceted eye on intellectual giftedness: Examining the personality of gifted students using FFM domains and facets. Psihologija, 45(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1203231A

Antulić Majcen

Ćurković

Bukvić

. (2019, April). Do we really use all the resources in working with gifted students? Research results obtained in Croatian primary schools [Paper presentation]. Izazovi u radu s darovitom djecom i mladima, Split, Croatia. https://www.bib.irb.hr/1115586

Baucal

Altaras Dimitrijević

Petrović

Janković

Stepanović Ilić

Krstić

Videnović

Rajić

Simić

Jovanović Milanović

Krnjaić

Jolić Marjanović

. (2022). Obrazovanje tokom pandemije Kovid-19 u Srbiji: kvalitativna studija [Education during the Covid-19 pandemic in Serbia: A qualitative study]. Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4546

Baudson

T. G

. (2016). The mad genius stereotype: Still alive and well. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368

Baudson

T. G.

Preckel

. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000011

Bergold

Wirthwein

Steinmayr

. (2020). Similarities and differences between intellectually gifted and average-ability students in school performance, motivation, and subjective well-being. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220932533

10.

Betts

G. T.

Neihart

. (1988). Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200202

11.

Bianco

Harris

Garrison-Wade

Leech

. (2011). Gifted girls: Gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33(3), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.580500

12.

Bland

L. C.

Sowa

C. J.

Callahan

C. M

. (1994). An overview of resilience in gifted children. Roeper Review, 17(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553629

13.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

14.

Braun

Clarke

. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

15.

Bronfenbrenner

. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

16.

Bronfenbrenner

. (2000). Ecological systems theory. In Kazdin

A. E.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 129–133). Oxford University Press.

17.

Calero

M. D.

García-Martín

M. B.

Jiménez

M. I.

Kazén

Araque

. (2007). Self-regulation advantage for high-IQ children: Findings from a research study. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.012

18.

Casino-García

A. M.

Llopis-Bueno

M. J.

Llinares-Insa

L. I

. (2021). Emotional intelligence profiles and self-esteem/self-concept: An analysis of relationships in gifted students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031006

19.

Chan

D. W

. (2010). Perfectionism among Chinese gifted and nongifted students in Hong Kong: The use of the Revised Almost Perfect Scale. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 68–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400104

20.

Coleman

L. J.

Cross

T. L

. (2000). Social-emotional development and the personal experience of giftedness. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 203–212). Elsevier.

21.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N

. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

22.

Dailey

Cotabish

Buchanan

Marshall

. (2024). Interrupted programming: The impact of school shutdown on gifted student identification and services. Journal of Advanced Academics, 35(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241232724

23.

Gagné

. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 98–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.008

24.

Golle

Schils

Borghans

Rose

. (2023). Who is considered gifted from a teacher’s perspective? A representative large-scale study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221104026

25.

Grugan

M. C.

Hill

A. P.

Madigan

D. J.

Donachie

T. C.

Olsson

L. F.

Etherson

M. E

. (2021). Perfectionism in academically gifted students: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1631–1673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09597-7

26.

Guilbault

K. M.

McCormick

. (2022). Supporting elementary gifted learners during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of teaching practices. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211070075

27.

Hernández-Torrano

Prieto

M. D.

Ferrándiz

Bermejo

Sáinz

. (2013). Characteristics leading teachers to nominate secondary students as gifted in Spain. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490197[ZJ3]

28.

Jokić

Ristić Dedić

. (2023). Odrastanje u (post)pandemijskom vremenu—iskustva iz Hrvatske [Growing up in (post-)pandemic times–Experiences from Croatia]. https://wwwadmin.idi.hr/uploads/Odrastanje_u_ppv_iskustva_iz_Hrvatske_IDIZ_f6b0d1f2e8.pdf

29.

Kanevsky

. (2011). Deferential differentiation: What types of differentiation do students want? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(4), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211422098

30.

Kaya

Islekeller-Bozca

. (2022). Experiences of gifted students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211069759

31.

Kitano

M. K.

Lewis

R. B

. (2005). Resilience and coping: Implications for gifted children and youth at risk. Roeper Review, 27(4), 200–205.

32.

Kroesbergen

E. H.

van Hooijdonk

Van Viersen

Middel-Lalleman

M. M. N.

Reijnders

J. J. W

. (2016). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113

33.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G

. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

34.

Matheis

Keller

L. K.

Kronborg

Schmitt

Preckel

. (2020). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs about student characteristics in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029

35.

Matheis

Kronborg

Schmitt

Preckel

. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685

36.

Matrić

Duh

. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of gifted, talented and EBD students. Didactica Slovenica Pedagoška Obzorja, 34(2), 67–81.

37.

Mayer

R. E

. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E

. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 437–447). Cambridge University Press.

38.

McCormick

K. M.

Guilbault

K. M

. (2022). An exploratory study of elementary gifted students’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(4), 327–338. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jgedc/issue/74010/1200878

39.

McCormick

K. M.

Guilbault

K. M

. (2024). Thriving amidst the pandemic: Teaching gifted students online and the role of adaptation and innovation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 35(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X231220052

40.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd edition). SAGE Publications.

41.

Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Croatia. (1993). Pravilnik o srednjoškolskom obrazovanju darovitih učenika [Ordinance on the secondary school education of gifted students] (OG 90/93). https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/eli/sluzbeni/1993/90/1755

42.

Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. (2017). Zakon o osnovama sistema obrazovanja [Law on the fundamentals of the education system] (No. 72/09, 52/11 and 55/13). Službeni glasnik RS.

43.

Ministry of Science and Education, Republic of Croatia. (2022, October 28). Smjernice za rad s darovitom djecom i učenicima [Guidelines for working with gifted children and students]. https://mzo.gov.hr/vijesti/smjernice-za-rad-s-darovitom-djecom-i-ucenicima/5101

44.

Noor

. (2023). Pressure and perfectionism: A phenomenological study on parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of the challenges faced by gifted and talented students in self-contained classes. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1225623. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1225623

45.

Ogurlu

. (2021). A meta-analytic review of emotional intelligence in gifted individuals: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, Article 110503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110503

46.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Lee

S.-Y

. (2004). Gifted adolescents’ talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800102

47.

Papandreou

Mavrogalou

Periferakis

A. T.

Periferakis

Badarau

I. A.

Popa-Velea

Scheau

. (2023). The effects of COVID-19 on the emotional and social stability, motivation and attitudes of gifted and non-gifted children in Greece. Children, 10(4), 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040706

48.

Patton

M. Q

. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.

49.

Peterson

J. S

. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946

50.

Potts

J. A

. (2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218801075

51.

Preckel

Baudson

T. G.

Krolak-Schwerdt

Glock

. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596413

52.

Preuss

L. J.

Dubow

E. F

. (2004). A comparison between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor. Roeper Review, 26(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554250

53.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S

. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144

54.

Renzulli

J. S

. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.015

55.

Roscoe

R. D.

Chi

M. T. H

. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920

56.

Samsen-Bronsveld

H. E.

Van der Ven

S. H. G.

Speetjens

P. P. A. M.

Bakx

A. W. E. A

. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on gifted and non-gifted primary school students’ well-being and motivation from a self-determination perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12583

57.

Schunk

D. H

. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.

58.

Shenton

A. K

. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

59.

Stricker

Buecker

Schneider

Preckel

. (2020). Intellectual giftedness and multidimensional perfectionism: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09504-1

60.

Sweetland

J. D.

Reina

J. M.

Tatti

A. F

. (2006). WISC-III verbal/performance discrepancies among a sample of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000102

61.

Terman

L. M

. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.

62.

Weyns

Preckel

Verschueren

. (2021). Teachers-in-training perceptions of gifted children’s characteristics and teacher-child interactions: An experimental study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, Article 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103215

63.

Whitmore

J. R

. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Allyn and Bacon.

64.

Winner

. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. Basic Books.

65.

Wolfgang

Snyderman

. (2022). An analysis of the impact of school closings on gifted services: Recommendations for meeting gifted students’ needs in a post-COVID-19 world. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054262

66.

Yin

R. K

. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications.

67.

Žagar

Artač

Bezič

Nagy

Purgaj

. (1999). Odkrivanje in delo z nadarjenimi učenci v devetletni osnovni šoli [Identifying and working with gifted students in primary school]. Nacionalni kurikularni svet.

68.

Zeidner

Shani-Zinovich

. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the big-five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.007

69.

Žerak

Juriševič

. (2023). Exploring mental representations of prospective teachers about gifted education using associative group analysis. High Ability Studies, 35, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2280658