The 50th anniversary of the Marland Report provides an opportunity to reflect on its impact on the field of gifted education. A critical question is how the Marland Report addressed the need for equity, especially since the Marland federal definition made no explicit mention of culturally, linguistically, or economically different gifted students. This article presents a review of (a) the history leading to the Marland Report, (b) the report’s content concerning equity in gifted education, and (c) the activity that resulted directly from the Marland legislation through the National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented, including national conferences and two teacher institutes about “culturally different” gifted students between 1973 and 1981. Implications include the consequences of neglecting the unique contributions the National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented made to the field and a suggested agenda for moving forward that includes long-desired changes and new directions.
AbbottJ. (1982a). An anthropological approach to the identification of Navajo gifted children, In Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted/talented. In AbbotJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 7–15). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
2.
AbbottJ. (Ed.). (1982b). Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
3.
AddisonL. (Ed.). (1981). Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
4.
AddisonL. (1982). Strengthening the minority and disadvantaged gifted student: Curricular to develop locus of control. In Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted/talented. Selected Proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted (pp 39–46). N/S-LTI-G/T.
AndersonB. N.Coleman-KingC.WallaceK.HarperF. K. (2022). Advancing critical and culturally relevant experiential learning: Preparing future educators in collaboration with cooperating teachers to support STEM engagement in urban schools. Urban Review, 54(5), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00633-y
7.
AragonJ.MarquezL. (1975). Cultural diversity and the exceptional child: The Spanish-speaking component. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 26–27). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
8.
ArnoldA. (1975). A research project on program provisions. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 38–39). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
9.
AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ.ShoplikA. (2014). A nation empowered. Belin-Blank Center.
10.
BaldwinA. (1975). Identifying the disadvantaged. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 10–12, 27). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
11.
BallingerJ.SchrecengostD. (1975). What teachers can do. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 36–38). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
12.
BarbeV. B. (1956). A study of the family background of the gifted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47(5), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041317
13.
BaskinB. H.HarrisK. S. (1981). Gifted disadvantaged children. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 179–184). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
14.
BernalE. (1975). Mexican American perceptions of child giftedness in three Texas communities. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 12–14, 27). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
15.
BernalE. (1982). Identifying minority gifted students: Special problems and procedures. In AbbottJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 51–61). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
16.
BirnbaumM.BlanningJ. M. (1978). Ideas for urban/rural gifted/talented: Case histories and program plans. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
17.
BlumenfeldW. S. (1969). Selecting talented Negro students: Nomination vs. test performance. National Merit Scholarship Corporation Research Reports. National Merit Scholarship Corporation, 5(6), 1–13.
BruchC. (1975). Using the creative Binet in the identification process. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 18–29). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
22.
CarmanC. A.WaltherC. A. P.BartschR. A. (2020). Differences in using the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) 7 Nonverbal Battery versus the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) 2 to identify the gifted/talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220921164
23.
ColemanJ. S.KellyS. D.MooreJ. A. (1975). Trends in school segregation, 1968-73. The Urban Institute.
24.
ColemanM. R.Shah-ColtraneS.HarradineC.TimmonsL. (2007). Impact of poverty on promising learners, their teachers, and their schools. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low income promising learners (pp. 59–61). National Association for Gifted Children.
25.
CroskeryB.MartenE. (1981). Drama and the disadvantaged gifted and talented child. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 197–204). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
26.
DerthickL. G. (1959). The effect of the National Defense Education Act of 1958 on our secondary schools. NASSP Bulletin, 43(246), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636559043246
27.
DodsonE.MitchellB. (1978). An approach to alternative programs for disadvantaged gifted. In RivlenH. N. (Ed.), The Third National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 39–46). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
28.
Elsbery Systems Analysis. (1974). 1974 annual report of the National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented [Appendix: Sections A and B].
29.
FarrellP. (1975). Teacher involvement in identification. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 20–21). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
30.
FitzgeraldE. (Ed.) (1975). The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
31.
FlattauP. E.BrackenJ.Van AttaR.Bandeh-AhmadiA.de la CruzR.SullivanK. (2006). The National Defense Education Act of 1958: Selected outcomes. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
FlieglerL. A.BishC. E. (1960). The gifted and talented: A few research highlights. The Education Digest, 25(9), 34–36.
34.
FordD. Y. (2013). Recruiting & retaining culturally different students in gifted education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237655
35.
FoxD. M.ClappC. H. (1970). The House rules committee and the programs of Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 14(4), 667–672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i310401
36.
FrasierM. M. (1978). Culturally different gifted/talented: Educational implications-cognitive. In RivlinH. N. (Ed.), Advantage: Disadvantaged gifted. Presentations from the Third National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 53–57). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
37.
FrasierM. M. (1982). Bibliotherapy: Educational and counseling implications for the gifted disadvantaged. In AbbottJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted/talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 1–6). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
38.
FrasierM. M.PassowA. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential (Research Monograph 94112). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
39.
GallagherJ. J. (1966). Research summary on gifted child education. Illinois State Department of Education.
40.
GallagherJ. J. (1968). The disadvantaged gifted. In TannenbaumA. (Ed.), Special education programs for the disadvantaged children and youth (pp.42–58). Council for Exceptional Children.
41.
GallagherJ. J. (1972). Analysis of hearings held by regional commissioners of education on education of the gifted (Appendix C in S. P. Marland, Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols., Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
GallagherJ. J. (Ed.). (1974). Talent delayed-talent denied: The culturally different gifted child, a conference report. The Foundation for Exceptional Children.
43.
GallagherJ. J. (1975). Hidden talent and its education. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 8, 32–35). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
44.
GallagherJ. J. (1979). Issues in gifted education. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
45.
GallagherJ. J.MossJ. (1964). New concepts of intelligence and their effect on exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 30(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296303000101
46.
GallagherS. A. (2020, January). Advocacy facing out: Talent delayed/Talent denied II. NCAGT Newsletter, 40(1), 1, 9–10.
47.
GallagherS. A. (2021, November11–14). Problem-based learning, meet culturally responsive instruction. Presentation at the Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Denver, CO, United States.
48.
GallagherS. A.GallagherJ. J. (2013). Using problem-based learning to explore unseen academic potential. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1322
49.
GamsonD. (2007). From Progressivism to Federalism: The pursuit of equal educational opportunity, 1915–1965. In KaestleC. F.LodewickA. (Eds.), To educate a nation: Federal and national strategies of school reform (pp. 177–201). University Press of Kansas.
50.
GayG. (2001). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
51.
GentryM.GrayA.WhitingG. W.MaedaY.PereiraN. (2019). Access denied/system failure. Gifted education in the United States: Laws, access, equity, and missingness across the country by locale, Title I school status, and race. Report cards, technical report, and website. Purdue University; Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
GomezS. (1978). The culturally different: Greater awareness. In RivlinH. N. (Ed.), Advantage: Disadvantaged gifted. Presentations from the Third National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 59–61). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
54.
GowanJ. C. (1961). An annotated bibliography on the academically talented. National Education Association, Project on the Academically Talented Student.
55.
GowanJ. C. (1975). The education of gifted youth. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 20, 45–47). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
56.
GranthamT. C. (2004). Multicultural mentoring to increase Black male representation in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800307
HughesH. H.ConverseH. D. (1962). Characteristics of the gifted: A case for a sequel to Terman’s study. Exceptional Child, 29(4), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440296202900406
62.
JacksonD. M.HouseE. R.KerinsT.LapanS.SteeleJ. M. (1972). Illinois evaluates its special program for the gifted, 1963-71 (Appendix F in S. P. Marland, Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols., Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office.
JollyJ. L.RobinsJ. H. (2016). After the Marland Report: Four decades of progress?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640937
66.
JonesE.GallagherS. A. (2019, March). America agrees: A national public opinion poll about gifted education. Institute for Educational Advancement. https://ieap.educationaladvancement.org/
67.
KaiserD. (2006). The physics of spin: Sputnik politics and American physicists in the 1950s. Social Research, 73(4), 1225–1252. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971881
68.
KaplanN. S. (1974). Providing programs for the gifted and talented: A handbook. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
69.
KaplanN. S. (1978). Culturally different gifted/talented: Educational implications-affective. In RivlinH. N. (Ed.), Advantage: Disadvantaged gifted. Presentations from the Third National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 53–57). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
70.
KisielewskiJ. (1972). State laws for education of gifted children (Appendix D in S. P. Marland, Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols., Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office.
71.
KitanoH. (1975). Cultural diversity and the exceptional child: Asian component. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 20–21). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
72.
KitoJ.LoweB. (1975). Cultural diversity and the exceptional child: Indian component. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 24–25). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
73.
Lawson-DavisJ. (2022). Bright, talented, and Black: A guide for families of Black gifted learners (2nd ed.). Gifted Unlimited.
74.
LovelessT. (1998). The tracking and ability grouping debate (Vol. 2). Thomas B Fordham Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED422454
75.
LynnB. (1968). Disadvantaged gifted progress in a new residential school, but work is completed at their own speed. There are not grades, credit means “B” minimum. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986268012001
76.
MakerC. J.MorrisE.JamesJ. (1981). The Eugene Field Project: A program for potentially gifted young children. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 117–175). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
77.
MarlandS. P. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education (Government Documents Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office.
78.
MarlandS. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the office of Education (Government Documents Y4.L 11/2: G36, 2 vols.). U.S. Government Printing Office.
79.
MartinsonR. (1961). Educational programs for gifted pupils. Sacramento California State Department of Education.
80.
MartinsonR. (1969). The preparation of teachers for inner-city schools: Final report code no. M8-8. Dominguez Hills California State College.
81.
MartinsonR. (1972). Research on the gifted and talented: Its implications for education (Appendix A in S. P. Marland, Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols., Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office).
82.
MartinsonR. (1974). Identification of the gifted and talented. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
83.
MartinsonR.LessingerL. M. (1960). Problems in the identification of intellectually gifted pupils. Exceptional Children, 26(5), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029600260050
84.
MeekerM. (1981). The status of nondiscriminatory testing procedures to assess giftedness in Blacks, Chicanos, Navajos, and Anglos: An answer to Jensen and Shockley on truth in testing. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 91–100). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
85.
MercerJ. R.LewisJ. F. (1981). Using the system of multicultural pluralistic assessment (SOMPA) to identify the gifted minority child. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 29–57). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
86.
MileyJ. F.SatoI. S.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.). (1975). Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
87.
MitchellB. (1975). Creativity and the poverty child. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 46–50). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
88.
MitchellB.DodsonE. (1975). SPICE-Instructional model for gifted minority students. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 51–52). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
89.
MorenoS. (1975). Assessment–its effects on the Mexican American. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 14–15). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
90.
National Association for Gifted Children. (1960). National Association for Gifted Children recommendations for the extension and revision of the National Defense Education Act of 1958. Gifted Child Quarterly, 4(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626000400406
91.
National Defense Education Act of 1958, Pub. L. No 85–864, § 72 Stat. 1580 (1958).
NelsonH. (1982). Identification of Black and Hispanic talented and gifted students—Grade K through 6: In search of an educational standard. In AbbottJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 63–90). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
94.
OlsonT. A. (1975, February). Raising consciousness of key publics about the needs of gifted and talented. Report of a National Planning Conference, New York, NY. N/S-LTI-G/T.
95.
PassowA. H. (1975). The gifted and the disadvantaged. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 51–57). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
96.
PassowA. H. (1981). There is “Gold in them Thar hills.” In AddisonL. (Ed.) Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 1–26). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
97.
PassowA. H. (1982). The gifted disadvantaged: Some reflections. In AbbottJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 19–28). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
98.
PegnatoC. W.BirchJ. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25(7), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029590250070
99.
PetersS. J. (2022). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
PlautR. L. (1957a). Blueprint for talent searching: America’s hidden manpower. National Scholarship Service and Fund for Negro Students. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED020955
102.
PlautR. L. (1957b). Searching and salvaging talent among socially disadvantaged populations. National Scholarship Service Fund for Negro Students.
103.
PlowmanP. D. (1972). California Mentally Gifted Minor Program: A brief history (Appendix F in S. P. Marland, Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols., Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). U.S. Government Printing Office.
104.
PluckerJ. A.PetersS. J. (2017). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented students. Harvard Education Press.
105.
PorterJ. (2017). A “precious minority”: Constructing the “gifted” and “academically talented” student in the era of Brown v. Board of Education and the National Defense Education Act. Isis, 108(3), 581–605. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/694446
RenzulliJ. S. (1975). Talented potential in minority group students. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 3–4, 24–27). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
108.
RiceJ. P. (1968). California Project Talent: A unique educational development. The Clearing House, 42(5), 305–312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30180672
109.
RivlinH. N. (Ed.). (1978a). Advantage: Disadvantaged gifted. Presentations from the Third National Conference on Disadvantaged gifted. National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
110.
RivlinH. N. (1978b). Different does not mean better than or worse than. In RivlinH. N. (Ed.), Advantage: Disadvantaged gifted. Presentations from the Third National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 1–6). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
SantayanaG. (1905). The life of reason. Scribners.
113.
SatoI. (1975a). The culturally different gifted child—The dawning of his day? In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 39–45). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
114.
SatoI. (1975b). Introduction to the First Annual Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 31–32). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
115.
SatoI.BirnbaumM.LoCiceroJ. E. (1974). Developing a written plan for educating gifted and talented students: A matrix for the National Summer Institute on the Education of the Gifted and the Talented. Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED104072.pdf
116.
SchmedingR. (1964). Group intelligence scores of gifted children: Degree of consistency and factors related to consistency. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 42(10), 991–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1964.tb04526.x
117.
SchulkindC. (1981). Programming for the culturally different, bilingual, economically disadvantaged gifted and talented child. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 207–216). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
SiskD. (1975). Developing teacher mediators/teacher training for the disadvantaged gifted. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 5–6, 40–41). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
121.
SmallwoodG.TaylorO. (1975). Cultural diversity and the exceptional child: Indian component. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 22–23). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
122.
SnyderT. D. (Ed.). (1993). 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf
123.
StallingsC. (1975). Gifted disadvantaged children. In FitzgeraldE. (Ed.), The First National Conference on the Disadvantaged Gifted (pp. 21–23, 41–44). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
TorranceE. P. (1975). Four promising practices for teaching gifted disadvantaged students. In MileyJ. F.SatoI.LucheW. J.WeaverP. W.CurryJ. A.PonceR. H. (Eds.), Promising practices: Teaching the disadvantaged gifted (pp. 1–19). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
127.
TorranceE. P.HallL. K. (1982). Assessing the further reaches of creative potential in “The Faces and Forms of Creativity.” In AbbottJ. (Ed.), Identifying and educating the disadvantaged gifted talented: Selected proceedings from the Fifth National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 81–98). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
128.
UrbanW. J. (2015). More than science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958. University of Alabama Press.
129.
WellmanF. E.TwifordD. D. (1961). Guidance, counseling, and testing program evaluation suggestions for secondary schools, Title V-A, National Defense Education Act of 1958. U.S. Office of Education.
130.
WilliamsJ. H.AddisonL. (1981). Training teachers to work with gifted minority students. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 219–232). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
131.
WolfM. H. (1981). Talent search and development in the visual and performing arts. In AddisonL. (Ed.), Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the Fourth Biennial National Conference on Disadvantaged Gifted/Talented (pp. 29–57). National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
