A growing number of school districts across the United States are experiencing racial backlash for their work on racial justice, anti-racism, and equity. Despite ‘anti-equity’ efforts, a noticeable number of school districts across the U.S. passed equity-oriented policies and resolutions in 2020. While these policies are intended to confront racism and inequity, some school districts have been critiqued for their policy efforts being merely symbolic and gestures of virtue signaling. However, we know very little empirically about the language and discourse used to construct these policies. To address this gap in the literature, we ask the following question: How and in what ways might school districts’ discursive positioning on racism in equity-oriented policies and resolutions serve as virtue signaling? Using critical discourse analysis, we find that districts position themselves as: 1) opposers of racism, 2) fixers of racism, 3) bystanders to racism, and 4) perpetrators of racism. This study concludes with implications for policy, future research, and school districts.
AnglinK. L. (2019). Gather-narrow-extract: A framework for studying local policy variation using web-scraping and natural language processing. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(4), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1654576
2.
ArellanoL.VueR. (2019). Transforming campus racial climates: Examining discourses around student experiences of racial violence and institutional (in)action. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000122
3.
BacchiC. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
4.
BallS.MaguireM.BraunA.PerrymanJ.HoskinsK. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
5.
BallS. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 10–17.
6.
BellD. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. Basic Books.
7.
BiscoeK.KhalifaM. (2015). School closure discourse: Implications for educational equity. Urban Education, 50(5), 546–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915602564
8.
BraunA.MaguireM.BallS. J. (2010). Policy enactment in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544
9.
BridgeforthJ. C. (2021). This isn’t who we are”: A critical discourse analysis of school and district leaders’ responses to racial violence. Journal of School Leadership, 31(1–2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684621992760
10.
BrookfieldS. (2005). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.
11.
BrownA.AugusteE.OmobhudeF.BakanaN.SukheraJ. (2022). Symbolic solidarity or virtue signaling? A critical discourse analysis of the public statements released by academic medical organizations in the wake of the killing of george floyd. Academic Medicine, 97(6), 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004597
12.
Casellas ConnorsI. (2021). Constructing a monolith: State policy, institutional DEI plans, and the flattening of latinx identity at hispanic-serving institutions. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211063872. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211063872
Casellas-ConnorsI.McCoyH. (2022). Performing anti-racism: Universities respond to anti-black violence. Race and Justice, 12(3), 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687221101787
15.
ChinM.IshimaruA. M.BangM. (2023). Realizing the future in the present: Parent organizing as a practice of solidarity. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 5(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2023.174
16.
ChuY. (2019). What are they talking about when they talk about equity? A content analysis of equity principles and provisions in state every student succeeds act plans. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(158). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4558
17.
ColeE. R.HarperS. R. (2017). Race and rhetoric: An analysis of college presidents’ statements on campus racial incidents. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000044
18.
DiemS.WeltonA. D. (2020). Anti-racist educational leadership and policy: Addressing racism in public education. Routledge.
19.
DiemS.YoungM. D. (2017). Considering racial diversity in educational policy processes: The politics of avoiding race. Educational Policy, 31(5), 567–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616489
20.
DixsonA. D. (2023). If I ruled the world: Race, policy, and action in education research. Teachers College Record, 125(5), 157–161.
21.
DumasM. J.AndersonR. (2014). Toward a framework for understanding the racialization of education: Critical race theory and educational policy. In LynnM.DixsonA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 19–34). Routledge.
22.
DumasM. J.RossK. M. (2016). “Be real Black for me”: Imagining BlackCrit in education. Urban Education, 51(4), 415–442.
23.
FaircloughN. (1989). Language and power. Pearson Education.
24.
FaircloughN. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). Sage.
25.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
26.
FelixE. R.TrinidadA.ChingC. D.BensimonE. M. (2018). California’s student equity policy: An unexploited opportunity among hispanic-serving community colleges. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 17(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717711715
27.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1979. Pantheon.
GeeJ. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education ((1st ed, pp. 49–80). Routledge.
30.
GenaoS.MercedesY. (2021). All we need is one mic: A call for anti-racist solidarity to deconstruct anti-black racism in educational leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 31(1–2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684621993046
GillbornD. (2014). The education system: Power, privilege, and policy. In TaylorE.GillbornD.Ladson-BillingsG. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education ((2nd ed, pp. 339–354). Oxford University Press.
33.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2017). Theoretical sampling. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook (pp. 105–114). Routledge.
34.
GreenT. L. (2017). Community-based equity audits: A practical approach for educational leaders to support equitable community-school improvements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16672513
35.
GreenT. L.CastroA.GermainE.HorneJ.SikesC.SanchezJ. (2023). They don't feel like this is their place anymore:” school Leaders’ understanding of the impacts of gentrification on schools. American Educational Research Journal, 60(6), 1059–1094. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312231191704
36.
GreenT. L.HorneJ. D.AnglinK.TrautmannK.ClaridaK.RalphK.SmithT. (2025). A critical content analysis of equity-oriented education policies and resolutions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251367782
37.
HenryA.DixsonA. D. (2016). Critical race theory in education: Theoretical and practical perspectives. In LynnM.DixsonA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 3–15). Routledge.
38.
HorsfordS. D. (2017, April). A race to the top from the bottom of the well? The paradox of race and US education reform. In The Educational Forum (Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 136–147). Routledge.
39.
HorsfordS. D.ScottJ. T.AndersonG. L. (2018). The politics of education policy in an era of inequality: Possibilities for democratic schooling. Routledge.
40.
IrbyD. J.GreenT.IshimaruA. M. (2022). PK–12 district leadership for equity: An exploration of director role configurations and vulnerabilities. American Journal of Education, 128(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.1086/719120
41.
IrbyD. J.IshimaruA. M. (eds) (2025). Doing the Work of Equity Leadership for Justice and Systems Change. Teachers College Press.
42.
IshimaruA. M. (2019). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.
43.
IshimaruA. M.BangM. (2022). Solidarity-driven codesign. In PeurachD. J.RussellJ. L.Cohen-VogelL.PenuelW. R. (Eds.), The foundational handbook on improvement research in education (pp. 383–402). Rowman & Littlefield.
44.
IshimaruA. M.IrbyD. J.GreenT. (2023). The paradox of organizational double jeopardy: PK-12 equity directors in racialized and gendered educational systems. The Urban Review, 55(3), 364–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00653-2
45.
KeddieA. (2020). Schooling and social justice through the lenses of nancy Fraser. In MurphyM.FlemingT. (Eds.), Nancy Fraser, social justice and education (pp. 40–56). Routledge.
46.
KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
47.
KhushfG. (1999). A conceptual clarification of substantive solidarity. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 20(4), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009905701990
48.
KohliR. (2019). Lessons for teacher education: The role of critical professional development in teacher of color retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118767645
49.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236881
50.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid for Brown. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 3–13.
51.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. Schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
LewisM. M.ModesteM. E.JohnsonR. M. (2023). The rise of the school district chief equity officer: Moving beyond mimetic isomorphism and promoting anti-racist systemic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(1), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231153404
55.
MilnerH. R.IV (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
56.
OzgaJ.LingardB. (2007). Globalisation, education policy and politics. In LingardB.OzgaJ. (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 75–92). Routledge.
57.
PhillipsS. D. (1996). Discourse, identity, and voice: Feminist contributions to policy studies. Policy studies in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 242–65). University of Toronto Press.
58.
PollockM.RogersJ.KwakoA.MatschinerA.KendallR.BingenerC.ReeceE.KennedyB.HowardJ. (2022). The conflict campaign: Exploring local experiences of the campaign to ban “Critical Race Theory” in public K-12 education in the U.S., 2020–2021 [Report]. UCLA/IDEA Publications. https://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/the-conflict-campaign/.
59.
PostmanN. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage.
60.
PrinsE.TosoB. W. (2008). Defining and measuring parenting for educational success: A critical discourse analysis of the parent education profile. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 555–596. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316205
61.
RodaA.BareK.BarbourF. (2024). Realizing the solidarity dividend: A new story for educational leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2324457
62.
RodriguezA.DeaneK. C.DavisC. H.III (2022). Towards a framework of racialized policymaking in higher education. In PernaL. W.DeaneK. C.DavisC. H. F. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Volume 37 (pp. 519–599). Springer International Publishing.
63.
RogersR. (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Routledge.
64.
RogersR.Malancharuvil-BerkesE.MosleyM.HuiD.JosephG. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365
65.
ScholzS. J. (2019). Solidarity: The past, present, and future of a radical idea. Temple University Press.
66.
Sotto-SantiagoS.Borboa-PetersonS.OzakiC. C.KelschA. (2021). Adoption of a cross-campus community of practice for the implementation of equity-focused faculty development. In ParsonL.OzakiC. C. (Eds.), Teaching and learning for social justice and equity in higher education (pp. 179–200). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81143-3_10
67.
TateW. F.Ladson-BillingsG.GrantC. A. (1993). The Brown decision revisited: Mathematizing social problems. Educational Policy, 7(3), 255–275.
68.
TaylorM. C. (2000). Social contextual strategies for reducing racial discrimination. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 71–91). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69.
ThompsonG. L.DorseyL. A.RoulhacM. (2018). School choice and equity: The importance of cultural context. Educational Policy, 32(6), 879–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817715826
WeltonA. D.DiemS.LentS. D. (2023). Let’s face it, the racial politics are always there: A critical race approach to policy implementation in the wake of anti-CRT rhetoric. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(109), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7654
72.
WinnM. T. (2020). Justice on both sides: Transforming education through restorative justice. Harvard Education Press.
73.
YehS. S. (2016). Solving the achievement gap: Overcoming the structure of school inequality. Springer.
